| Message ID | cover.1502246501.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Fix y2038 issues for security/keys subsystem | expand |
The rxrpc patch isn't part of the security/keys subsystem. I'll push it to the network tree. The other two I'll push to James. David
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 4:51 AM, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> wrote: > Since 'time_t', 'timeval' and 'timespec' types are not year 2038 safe on > 32 bits system, this patchset tries to fix this issues for security/keys > subsystem and net/rxrpc subsystem which is connected with security/keys > subsystem. > > Baolin Wang (3): > security: keys: Replace time_t/timespec with time64_t > security: keys: Replace time_t with time64_t for struct > key_preparsed_payload > net: rxrpc: Replace time_t type with time64_t type Hi David, I did a private review before Baolin posted these patches, this version look correct to me, though I would like to see some clarification from you for the rxrpc portion, I'll reply there separately. All three patches Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Hi Arnd, On 9 August 2017 at 16:44, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 4:51 AM, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> wrote: >> Since 'time_t', 'timeval' and 'timespec' types are not year 2038 safe on >> 32 bits system, this patchset tries to fix this issues for security/keys >> subsystem and net/rxrpc subsystem which is connected with security/keys >> subsystem. >> >> Baolin Wang (3): >> security: keys: Replace time_t/timespec with time64_t >> security: keys: Replace time_t with time64_t for struct >> key_preparsed_payload >> net: rxrpc: Replace time_t type with time64_t type > > Hi David, > > I did a private review before Baolin posted these patches, this version look > correct to me, though I would like to see some clarification from you for the > rxrpc portion, I'll reply there separately. > > All three patches > > Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Thanks for your reviewed tag. -- Baolin.wang Best Regards
Hi David and James, On 9 August 2017 at 16:28, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote: > The rxrpc patch isn't part of the security/keys subsystem. I'll push it > to the network tree. The other two I'll push to James. Could you apply this patch serials if there are no other comments? Thanks. -- Baolin.wang Best Regards
Hi James, On 21 August 2017 at 20:12, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi David and James, > > On 9 August 2017 at 16:28, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote: >> The rxrpc patch isn't part of the security/keys subsystem. I'll push it >> to the network tree. The other two I'll push to James. > > Could you apply this patch serials if there are no other comments? Thanks. Could you apply patch1 and patch2? I have seen patch3 was merged into 4.14 by David. Thanks. -- Baolin.wang Best Regards
Since 'time_t', 'timeval' and 'timespec' types are not year 2038 safe on 32 bits system, this patchset tries to fix this issues for security/keys subsystem and net/rxrpc subsystem which is connected with security/keys subsystem. Baolin Wang (3): security: keys: Replace time_t/timespec with time64_t security: keys: Replace time_t with time64_t for struct key_preparsed_payload net: rxrpc: Replace time_t type with time64_t type include/keys/rxrpc-type.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/key-type.h | 2 +- include/linux/key.h | 7 ++++--- net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h | 2 +- net/rxrpc/key.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- net/rxrpc/rxkad.c | 14 +++++++------- security/keys/gc.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- security/keys/internal.h | 8 ++++---- security/keys/key.c | 27 ++++++++++----------------- security/keys/keyring.c | 18 +++++++++--------- security/keys/permission.c | 3 +-- security/keys/proc.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- security/keys/process_keys.c | 2 +- 13 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-) -- 1.7.9.5