Message ID | 20171009090338.26033-1-kishon@ti.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | phy: ti-pipe3: Update PCIe PHY settings | expand |
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 02:33:36PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > This was supposed to only update ti-pipe3 PHY registers. However because > of the way the ti-pipe3 PHY, OCP2SCP and PCIe controller are connected > in dra7xx where > > PCIe controller --------------> ti-pipe3 PHY --------------> OCP2SCP > depends on depends on > > updating ti-pipe3 PHY registers results in an abort. > > Though the dependency between ti-pipe3 PHY and OCP2SCP is created > (OCP2SCP is parent of ti-pipe3 PHY), and enabling ti-pipe3 PHY clocks > should in turn enable OCP2SCP (with the help of pm_runtime framework), > this doesn't work in no_irq stage since pm_runtime is disabled during > no_irq stage. Since pci-dra7xx enables/initializes ti-pipe3 phy in > no_irq stage, OCP2SCP is not enabled resulting in an abort with ti-pipe3 > PHY registers are accessed. > > In order to solve this a functional dependency is created between > PCIe and ti-pipe3 PHY so that PCIe is suspended before PHY/OCP2SCP > and resumed after PCIe PHY/OCP2SCP > > Kishon Vijay Abraham I (2): > PCI: dwc: dra7xx: Create functional dependency between PCIe and PHY s/PCI: dwc: dra7xx: Create functional dependency between PCIe and PHY/ PCI: dra7xx: Create functional dependency between PCIe and PHY/ Should these be merged together? If it makes sense for you to merge them together, here's my ack for the PCI piece: Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Let me know if you'd like me to take one or both of them. > phy: ti-pipe3: Update pcie phy settings > > drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 16 +++++++ > drivers/phy/ti/phy-ti-pipe3.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > -- > 2.11.0 >
On Wednesday 18 October 2017 01:01 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 02:33:36PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> This was supposed to only update ti-pipe3 PHY registers. However because >> of the way the ti-pipe3 PHY, OCP2SCP and PCIe controller are connected >> in dra7xx where >> >> PCIe controller --------------> ti-pipe3 PHY --------------> OCP2SCP >> depends on depends on >> >> updating ti-pipe3 PHY registers results in an abort. >> >> Though the dependency between ti-pipe3 PHY and OCP2SCP is created >> (OCP2SCP is parent of ti-pipe3 PHY), and enabling ti-pipe3 PHY clocks >> should in turn enable OCP2SCP (with the help of pm_runtime framework), >> this doesn't work in no_irq stage since pm_runtime is disabled during >> no_irq stage. Since pci-dra7xx enables/initializes ti-pipe3 phy in >> no_irq stage, OCP2SCP is not enabled resulting in an abort with ti-pipe3 >> PHY registers are accessed. >> >> In order to solve this a functional dependency is created between >> PCIe and ti-pipe3 PHY so that PCIe is suspended before PHY/OCP2SCP >> and resumed after PCIe PHY/OCP2SCP >> >> Kishon Vijay Abraham I (2): >> PCI: dwc: dra7xx: Create functional dependency between PCIe and PHY > > s/PCI: dwc: dra7xx: Create functional dependency between PCIe and PHY/ > PCI: dra7xx: Create functional dependency between PCIe and PHY/ > > Should these be merged together? If it makes sense for you to merge them > together, here's my ack for the PCI piece: > > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Yeah both should be merged together. I'll make the change you suggested, add your Ack and merge myself. Thanks Kishon