From patchwork Fri Jun 10 07:26:01 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ping-Ke Shih X-Patchwork-Id: 581967 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075C9CCA47E for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 07:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244158AbiFJH1Q (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 03:27:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56342 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346802AbiFJH0x (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 03:26:53 -0400 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com.tw (rtits2.realtek.com [211.75.126.72]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDD75D571A for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:26:50 -0700 (PDT) Authenticated-By: X-SpamFilter-By: ArmorX SpamTrap 5.73 with qID 25A7QjyhE010126, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 Received: from mail.realtek.com (rtexh36505.realtek.com.tw[172.21.6.25]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/2.71/5.88) with ESMTPS id 25A7QjyhE010126 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:26:45 +0800 Received: from RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) by RTEXH36505.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.28; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:26:45 +0800 Received: from localhost (172.21.69.188) by RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.21; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:26:44 +0800 From: Ping-Ke Shih To: CC: , , Subject: [PATCH 02/11] rtw89: separate BSSID CAM operations Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:26:01 +0800 Message-ID: <20220610072610.27095-3-pkshih@realtek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220610072610.27095-1-pkshih@realtek.com> References: <20220610072610.27095-1-pkshih@realtek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [172.21.69.188] X-ClientProxiedBy: RTEXMBS02.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.95) To RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) X-KSE-ServerInfo: RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw, 9 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: trusted connection X-KSE-Antiphishing-Info: Clean X-KSE-Antiphishing-ScanningType: Deterministic X-KSE-Antiphishing-Method: None X-KSE-Antiphishing-Bases: 06/10/2022 07:06:00 X-KSE-AttachmentFiltering-Interceptor-Info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found X-KSE-Antivirus-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KSE-Antivirus-Info: =?big5_tw?b?Q2xlYW4sIGJhc2VzOiAyMDIyLzYvMTAgpFekyCAwNjow?= =?big5_tw?b?MDowMA==?= X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: protection disabled X-KSE-ServerInfo: RTEXH36505.realtek.com.tw, 9 X-KSE-Attachment-Filter-Triggered-Rules: Clean X-KSE-Attachment-Filter-Triggered-Filters: Clean X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: protection disabled Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Normally, we allocate a BSSID CAM to a vif. By hardware design, we must allocate a BSSID CAM to each TDLS peer, so separate BSSID CAM operations that will be used by later patches. This patch doesn't change logic at all. Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++-------- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.h | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.c index db3c55f0ccd0d..d82a77c74b1b1 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.c @@ -445,15 +445,22 @@ void rtw89_cam_deinit_addr_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, clear_bit(addr_cam->addr_cam_idx, cam_info->addr_cam_map); } -void rtw89_cam_deinit(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif) +void rtw89_cam_deinit_bssid_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, + struct rtw89_bssid_cam_entry *bssid_cam) { struct rtw89_cam_info *cam_info = &rtwdev->cam_info; + + bssid_cam->valid = false; + clear_bit(bssid_cam->bssid_cam_idx, cam_info->bssid_cam_map); +} + +void rtw89_cam_deinit(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif) +{ struct rtw89_addr_cam_entry *addr_cam = &rtwvif->addr_cam; struct rtw89_bssid_cam_entry *bssid_cam = &rtwvif->bssid_cam; rtw89_cam_deinit_addr_cam(rtwdev, addr_cam); - bssid_cam->valid = false; - clear_bit(bssid_cam->bssid_cam_idx, cam_info->bssid_cam_map); + rtw89_cam_deinit_bssid_cam(rtwdev, bssid_cam); } void rtw89_cam_reset_keys(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev) @@ -539,10 +546,11 @@ static int rtw89_cam_get_avail_bssid_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, return 0; } -static int rtw89_cam_init_bssid_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, - struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif) +int rtw89_cam_init_bssid_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, + struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif, + struct rtw89_bssid_cam_entry *bssid_cam, + const u8 *bssid) { - struct rtw89_bssid_cam_entry *bssid_cam = &rtwvif->bssid_cam; u8 bssid_cam_idx; int ret; @@ -563,7 +571,7 @@ static int rtw89_cam_init_bssid_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, bssid_cam->len = BSSID_CAM_ENT_SIZE; bssid_cam->offset = 0; bssid_cam->valid = true; - ether_addr_copy(bssid_cam->bssid, rtwvif->bssid); + ether_addr_copy(bssid_cam->bssid, bssid); return 0; } @@ -581,7 +589,7 @@ int rtw89_cam_init(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif) struct rtw89_bssid_cam_entry *bssid_cam = &rtwvif->bssid_cam; int ret; - ret = rtw89_cam_init_bssid_cam(rtwdev, rtwvif); + ret = rtw89_cam_init_bssid_cam(rtwdev, rtwvif, bssid_cam, rtwvif->bssid); if (ret) { rtw89_err(rtwdev, "failed to init bssid cam\n"); return ret; diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.h index 74a6c4748d64f..affc50d680d1e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.h @@ -359,6 +359,12 @@ int rtw89_cam_init_addr_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, const struct rtw89_bssid_cam_entry *bssid_cam); void rtw89_cam_deinit_addr_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_addr_cam_entry *addr_cam); +int rtw89_cam_init_bssid_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, + struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif, + struct rtw89_bssid_cam_entry *bssid_cam, + const u8 *bssid); +void rtw89_cam_deinit_bssid_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, + struct rtw89_bssid_cam_entry *bssid_cam); void rtw89_cam_fill_addr_cam_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_vif *vif, struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta,