@@ -144,26 +144,9 @@ static struct ieee80211_supported_band rtw_band_5ghz = {
struct rtw_watch_dog_iter_data {
struct rtw_dev *rtwdev;
struct rtw_vif *rtwvif;
+ bool cfg_csi_rate;
};
-static void rtw_dynamic_csi_rate(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_vif *rtwvif)
-{
- struct rtw_bf_info *bf_info = &rtwdev->bf_info;
- u8 fix_rate_enable = 0;
- u8 new_csi_rate_idx;
-
- if (rtwvif->bfee.role != RTW_BFEE_SU &&
- rtwvif->bfee.role != RTW_BFEE_MU)
- return;
-
- rtw_chip_cfg_csi_rate(rtwdev, rtwdev->dm_info.min_rssi,
- bf_info->cur_csi_rpt_rate,
- fix_rate_enable, &new_csi_rate_idx);
-
- if (new_csi_rate_idx != bf_info->cur_csi_rpt_rate)
- bf_info->cur_csi_rpt_rate = new_csi_rate_idx;
-}
-
static void rtw_vif_watch_dog_iter(void *data, u8 *mac,
struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
{
@@ -174,7 +157,8 @@ static void rtw_vif_watch_dog_iter(void *data, u8 *mac,
if (vif->bss_conf.assoc)
iter_data->rtwvif = rtwvif;
- rtw_dynamic_csi_rate(iter_data->rtwdev, rtwvif);
+ iter_data->cfg_csi_rate = rtwvif->bfee.role == RTW_BFEE_SU ||
+ rtwvif->bfee.role == RTW_BFEE_MU;
rtwvif->stats.tx_unicast = 0;
rtwvif->stats.rx_unicast = 0;
@@ -241,6 +225,19 @@ static void rtw_watch_dog_work(struct work_struct *work)
/* use atomic version to avoid taking local->iflist_mtx mutex */
rtw_iterate_vifs_atomic(rtwdev, rtw_vif_watch_dog_iter, &data);
+ if (data.cfg_csi_rate) {
+ struct rtw_bf_info *bf_info = &rtwdev->bf_info;
+ u8 fix_rate_enable = 0;
+ u8 new_csi_rate_idx;
+
+ rtw_chip_cfg_csi_rate(rtwdev, rtwdev->dm_info.min_rssi,
+ bf_info->cur_csi_rpt_rate,
+ fix_rate_enable, &new_csi_rate_idx);
+
+ if (new_csi_rate_idx != bf_info->cur_csi_rpt_rate)
+ bf_info->cur_csi_rpt_rate = new_csi_rate_idx;
+ }
+
/* fw supports only one station associated to enter lps, if there are
* more than two stations associated to the AP, then we can not enter
* lps, because fw does not handle the overlapped beacon interval
rtw_bf_cfg_csi_rate() internally access some registers while being called unter an atomic lock acquired by rtw_iterate_vifs_atomic(). Move the rtw_bf_cfg_csi_rate() call out of rtw_vif_watch_dog_iter() in preparation for SDIO support where register access may sleep. Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> --- v2 -> v3: - no changes v1 -> v2: - keep rtw_iterate_vifs_atomic() to not undo the fix from commit 5b0efb4d670c8 ("rtw88: avoid circular locking between local->iflist_mtx and rtwdev->mutex") and instead call rtw_bf_cfg_csi_rate() from rtw_watch_dog_work() (outside the atomic section) as suggested by Ping-Ke. drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c | 35 +++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)