From patchwork Thu Jan 18 15:22:11 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hugo Villeneuve X-Patchwork-Id: 763849 Received: from mail.hugovil.com (mail.hugovil.com [162.243.120.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C8562D7BD; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:22:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=162.243.120.170 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705591365; cv=none; b=fYrnWRCTDo5e6fTapyuX1XO13tDGLv41ShdtbPvezsiObTBIfR+nStkPQ11XER2AVOP1D3O32aHA55xNIz3/GrU2mkzsiYJ6SidvKgKtiELvL9sMsUqumcjLZyLST9cVHjtXN1YPjKGLzehHi5vgFl1AJV92DQAu8bO3KhgdCE8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705591365; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xqRgH0sK4hsd3lSM17ep0kGG96Mu+DR07FI30LY9QIE=; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:From:To:Cc:Date:Message-Id:X-Mailer: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP:X-SA-Exim-Mail-From:X-Spam-Checker-Version: X-Spam-Level:X-Spam-Report:X-Spam-Status:Subject:X-SA-Exim-Version: X-SA-Exim-Scanned; b=f+of/ECyVI5V8z8fOdZ6/7naVjLcdXNYhZ9KrLzquncMgZLfrB2XIg5PnfTbXODFmQ1LaoDjfnW/IUEeQo3VFwcze0VPGoue34u2d6OH50sdGjSTKFPzaHl9h28z+n30h6MDpmEPpIQppUCYpd2qedpLCyTS8nR8H+BpZM2XYEA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hugovil.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hugovil.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hugovil.com header.i=@hugovil.com header.b=JjVNo0Et; arc=none smtp.client-ip=162.243.120.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hugovil.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hugovil.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hugovil.com header.i=@hugovil.com header.b="JjVNo0Et" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hugovil.com ; s=x; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Cc:To :From:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SjjfnVxtYArfpXNxv/BTC5usqjqb6ccyPOZwlWfH698=; b=JjVNo0EtgTHPU/RwtxwnLbDDR0 T5vaaHiBUBRpdMq5zuglY2w2R7ROjj+46ix2yWoiQLUPDCdp4z1bucqsiRTRJhDPnjvX8lNz7b+rh zPTf0s5gVe6MRnbXCAkbd6CvIZncpLVJ3L63t54n8E+pUhQxygphIWA72h3+WUWG8RbE=; Received: from modemcable168.174-80-70.mc.videotron.ca ([70.80.174.168]:57058 helo=pettiford.lan) by mail.hugovil.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rQUE3-0002lf-7Y; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:22:41 -0500 From: Hugo Villeneuve To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jirislaby@kernel.org, cosmin.tanislav@analog.com, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, shc_work@mail.ru Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, hugo@hugovil.com, Hugo Villeneuve Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:22:11 -0500 Message-Id: <20240118152213.2644269-16-hugo@hugovil.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240118152213.2644269-1-hugo@hugovil.com> References: <20240118152213.2644269-1-hugo@hugovil.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 70.80.174.168 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: hugo@hugovil.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. Subject: [PATCH v2 15/17] serial: max310x: replace bare use of 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int' (checkpatch) X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.hugovil.com) From: Hugo Villeneuve Fixes the following checkpatch warnings: WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' With this change, the affected functions now match the prototypes in struct gpio_chip. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve --- drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c b/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c index e39d8ea51e4e..9faea1224a58 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c @@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused max310x_resume(struct device *dev) static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(max310x_pm_ops, max310x_suspend, max310x_resume); #ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB -static int max310x_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) +static int max310x_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) { unsigned int val; struct max310x_port *s = gpiochip_get_data(chip); @@ -1167,7 +1167,7 @@ static int max310x_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) return !!((val >> 4) & (1 << (offset % 4))); } -static void max310x_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value) +static void max310x_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset, int value) { struct max310x_port *s = gpiochip_get_data(chip); struct uart_port *port = &s->p[offset / 4].port; @@ -1176,7 +1176,7 @@ static void max310x_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value) value ? 1 << (offset % 4) : 0); } -static int max310x_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) +static int max310x_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) { struct max310x_port *s = gpiochip_get_data(chip); struct uart_port *port = &s->p[offset / 4].port; @@ -1187,7 +1187,7 @@ static int max310x_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) } static int max310x_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, - unsigned offset, int value) + unsigned int offset, int value) { struct max310x_port *s = gpiochip_get_data(chip); struct uart_port *port = &s->p[offset / 4].port;