Message ID | 20250513215934.933807-1-jm@ti.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Introduce PRU UART driver | expand |
On 13/05/2025 23:59, Judith Mendez wrote: > The PRU_ICSSG subsystems in am64x SoC, the PRU subsystem in am62 SoC, and > PRU_ICSS subsystem in am335x SoC include a UART sub-module. This patch > series introduces the driver and the corresponding binding documentation > for this UART sub-module. > > The DTS patches for adding PRU UART nodes and enabling PRU UART is added > in this v1 version, but marked as DONOTMERGE since the patches only add > context to this series. > > This driver version has been tested on the following boards: am64x SK and > am62x SK. > > The RFC version of this driver has been previously tested on am335x SK as > well. DTS patches for enabling PRU UART for am335x SK will be sent as a > separate series once this series is merged. > > Changes since RFC: So this is v2 or v3. If this is confusing, just use b4 which does it for you. Otherwise how are we supposed to compare it with b4 diff? Best regards, Krzysztof
On 13/05/2025 23:59, Judith Mendez wrote: > Add documentation for PRU UART node which is for PRU serial UART > based-off the industry standard TL16C550 asynchronous communications > element. > > Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > Nothing in cover letter explains dependency and this the most important part of cover letter. Otherwise how maintainers are supposed to guess what they can take and what cannot? Squash the patch with previous in such case. > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml > index 927b3200e29e..54397297cbf5 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml > @@ -324,6 +324,13 @@ patternProperties: > $ref: /schemas/net/ti,davinci-mdio.yaml# > type: object > > + serial@[a-f0-9]+$: > + description: | Do not need '|' unless you need to preserve formatting. Best regards, Krzysztof