Message ID | 20230226222654.1741900-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter | expand |
Hello, On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 11:26:45PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > this is v2 of the series. I send it a bit earlier than I planned to do that > initially because I failed to send v1 completely to the linux-i2c list. > > Changes since (implicit) v1: > - Added Acks for patches #5, #6 and #8 > - Fixed kernel doc as pointed out by Luca Ceresoli (patch #7) > - Send all patches to linux-i2c mailing list > - Rebased to current Linus' tree. > This reduces the list of prerequisite patches to two. > > I updated > > https://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/linux i2c-probe-new > > accordingly. Linus tree now contains all patches that are a prerequisite for this series. I rebased the above branch again on top of linus/master and now it contains only the change sets included in this series. Also no unexpected new usages of .probe() appeared in Linus's tree (nor in next). Also there are no changes to any of the files touched by this series in next. So this series is ready to be applied once Linus cuts -rc1. Best regards Uwe
> So this series is ready to be applied once Linus cuts -rc1.
I applied it to for-current now and plan to have it in -rc2. Thank you!
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 10:12:14PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > So this series is ready to be applied once Linus cuts -rc1. > > I applied it to for-current now and plan to have it in -rc2. Thank you! Great, this is even quicker than I anticipated. I thought this will go into next first and into mainline only during the next merge window. If you can convince Linus to take that for -rc2, fine for me. Best regards and thanks, Uwe