@@ -5570,6 +5570,7 @@ static struct lpfc_nodelist *
__lpfc_findnode_did(struct lpfc_vport *vport, uint32_t did)
{
struct lpfc_nodelist *ndlp;
+ struct lpfc_nodelist *np = NULL;
uint32_t data1;
list_for_each_entry(ndlp, &vport->fc_nodes, nlp_listp) {
@@ -5584,14 +5585,20 @@ __lpfc_findnode_did(struct lpfc_vport *vport, uint32_t did)
ndlp, ndlp->nlp_DID,
ndlp->nlp_flag, data1, ndlp->nlp_rpi,
ndlp->active_rrqs_xri_bitmap);
- return ndlp;
+
+ /* Check for new or potentially stale node */
+ if (ndlp->nlp_state != NLP_STE_UNUSED_NODE)
+ return ndlp;
+ np = ndlp;
}
}
- /* FIND node did <did> NOT FOUND */
- lpfc_printf_vlog(vport, KERN_INFO, LOG_NODE,
- "0932 FIND node did x%x NOT FOUND.\n", did);
- return NULL;
+ if (!np)
+ /* FIND node did <did> NOT FOUND */
+ lpfc_printf_vlog(vport, KERN_INFO, LOG_NODE,
+ "0932 FIND node did x%x NOT FOUND.\n", did);
+
+ return np;
}
struct lpfc_nodelist *
After a port swap between separate fabrics, there may be multiple nodes in the vport's fc_nodes list with the same fabric well known address. Duplication is temporary and eventually resolves itself after dev_loss_tmo expires, but nameserver queries may still occur before dev_loss_tmo. This possibly results in returning stale fabric ndlp objects. Fix by adding an nlp_state check to ensure the ndlp search routine returns the correct newer allocated ndlp fabric object. Signed-off-by: Justin Tee <justin.tee@broadcom.com> --- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)