diff mbox series

[2/4] scsi: ufs: Re-use exec_dev_cmd

Message ID 20240304092346.654-3-avri.altman@wdc.com
State Superseded
Headers show
Series Re-use device management code fragments | expand

Commit Message

Avri Altman March 4, 2024, 9:23 a.m. UTC 
Move out the actual command issue from exec_dev_cmd so it can be used
elsewhere.  While at it, as a free bonus, call the upiu trace if it
doesn't.

Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
---
 drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

Comments

Avri Altman March 5, 2024, 7:54 p.m. UTC | #1 
> On 3/4/24 01:23, Avri Altman wrote:
> > +static int __exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp,
> > +                       const u32 tag, int timeout)
> 
> Please choose a better name than __exec_dev_cmd. Function names in this file
> should start with the ufshcd_ prefix.
Done.

> 
> > @@ -3300,28 +3318,15 @@ static void ufshcd_dev_man_unlock(struct
> ufs_hba *hba)
> >   static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> >               enum dev_cmd_type cmd_type, int timeout)
> >   {
> > -     DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
> >       const u32 tag = hba->reserved_slot;
> > -     struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp;
> > +     struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
> >       int err;
> >
> > -     lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
> > -     lrbp->cmd = NULL;
> >       err = ufshcd_compose_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, cmd_type, tag);
> 
> Please restore the "lrbp->cmd = NULL" assignment. I don't think that it is safe to
> remove that assignment.
This is a redundant assignment - being set to null in ufshcd_compose_dev_cmd.

Thanks,
Avri
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.
Avri Altman March 5, 2024, 8:27 p.m. UTC | #2 
> 
> On 3/5/24 11:54, Avri Altman wrote:
> > Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >> Please restore the "lrbp->cmd = NULL" assignment. I don't think that
> >> it is safe to remove that assignment.
>  >
> > This is a redundant assignment - being set to null in
> ufshcd_compose_dev_cmd.
> 
> Shouldn't this be mentioned in the patch description?
Will add.

Thanks,
Avri

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index 7456f046e7de..6661054e4872 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -3286,6 +3286,24 @@  static void ufshcd_dev_man_unlock(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 	ufshcd_release(hba);
 }
 
+static int __exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp,
+			  const u32 tag, int timeout)
+{
+	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
+	int err;
+
+	hba->dev_cmd.complete = &wait;
+
+	ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(hba, UFS_QUERY_SEND, lrbp->ucd_req_ptr);
+
+	ufshcd_send_command(hba, tag, hba->dev_cmd_queue);
+	err = ufshcd_wait_for_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, timeout);
+
+	ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(hba, err ? UFS_QUERY_ERR : UFS_QUERY_COMP,
+				    (struct utp_upiu_req *)lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr);
+
+	return err;
+}
 /**
  * ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd - API for sending device management requests
  * @hba: UFS hba
@@ -3300,28 +3318,15 @@  static void ufshcd_dev_man_unlock(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 		enum dev_cmd_type cmd_type, int timeout)
 {
-	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
 	const u32 tag = hba->reserved_slot;
-	struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp;
+	struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
 	int err;
 
-	lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
-	lrbp->cmd = NULL;
 	err = ufshcd_compose_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, cmd_type, tag);
 	if (unlikely(err))
-		goto out;
-
-	hba->dev_cmd.complete = &wait;
-
-	ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(hba, UFS_QUERY_SEND, lrbp->ucd_req_ptr);
-
-	ufshcd_send_command(hba, tag, hba->dev_cmd_queue);
-	err = ufshcd_wait_for_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, timeout);
-	ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(hba, err ? UFS_QUERY_ERR : UFS_QUERY_COMP,
-				    (struct utp_upiu_req *)lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr);
+		return err;
 
-out:
-	return err;
+	return __exec_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, tag, timeout);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -7203,7 +7208,6 @@  static int ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 					enum dev_cmd_type cmd_type,
 					enum query_opcode desc_op)
 {
-	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
 	const u32 tag = hba->reserved_slot;
 	struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp;
 	int err = 0;
@@ -7240,17 +7244,12 @@  static int ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 
 	memset(lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr, 0, sizeof(struct utp_upiu_rsp));
 
-	hba->dev_cmd.complete = &wait;
-
-	ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(hba, UFS_QUERY_SEND, lrbp->ucd_req_ptr);
-
-	ufshcd_send_command(hba, tag, hba->dev_cmd_queue);
 	/*
 	 * ignore the returning value here - ufshcd_check_query_response is
 	 * bound to fail since dev_cmd.query and dev_cmd.type were left empty.
 	 * read the response directly ignoring all errors.
 	 */
-	ufshcd_wait_for_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, QUERY_REQ_TIMEOUT);
+	__exec_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, tag, QUERY_REQ_TIMEOUT);
 
 	/* just copy the upiu response as it is */
 	memcpy(rsp_upiu, lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr, sizeof(*rsp_upiu));
@@ -7365,7 +7364,6 @@  int ufshcd_advanced_rpmb_req_handler(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct utp_upiu_req *r
 			 struct ufs_ehs *rsp_ehs, int sg_cnt, struct scatterlist *sg_list,
 			 enum dma_data_direction dir)
 {
-	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
 	const u32 tag = hba->reserved_slot;
 	struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp;
 	int err = 0;
@@ -7412,11 +7410,7 @@  int ufshcd_advanced_rpmb_req_handler(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct utp_upiu_req *r
 
 	memset(lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr, 0, sizeof(struct utp_upiu_rsp));
 
-	hba->dev_cmd.complete = &wait;
-
-	ufshcd_send_command(hba, tag, hba->dev_cmd_queue);
-
-	err = ufshcd_wait_for_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, ADVANCED_RPMB_REQ_TIMEOUT);
+	err = __exec_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, tag, ADVANCED_RPMB_REQ_TIMEOUT);
 
 	if (!err) {
 		/* Just copy the upiu response as it is */