From patchwork Tue Sep 27 02:29:39 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jason Yan X-Patchwork-Id: 610007 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58282C07E9D for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 02:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230090AbiI0CTT (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 22:19:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60906 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230017AbiI0CTL (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 22:19:11 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58FB2A9271; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 19:19:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from canpemm500004.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Mc39T56wvzlVhl; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:14:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by canpemm500004.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.92) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:19:07 +0800 From: Jason Yan To: , CC: , , , , , , , Jason Yan Subject: [PATCH v3 6/8] scsi: libsas: use sas_phy_match_dev_addr() instead of open coded Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:29:39 +0800 Message-ID: <20220927022941.4029476-7-yanaijie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20220927022941.4029476-1-yanaijie@huawei.com> References: <20220927022941.4029476-1-yanaijie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.127.227] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To canpemm500004.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.92) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org The sas address comparation of domain device and expander phy is open coded. Now we can replace it with sas_phy_match_dev_addr(). Signed-off-by: Jason Yan --- drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 18 ++++++------------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c index df5a64ad902f..b2b5103c3e76 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c @@ -738,9 +738,7 @@ static void sas_ex_get_linkrate(struct domain_device *parent, phy->phy_state == PHY_NOT_PRESENT) continue; - if (SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr) == - SAS_ADDR(child->sas_addr)) { - + if (sas_phy_match_dev_addr(child, phy)) { child->min_linkrate = min(parent->min_linkrate, phy->linkrate); child->max_linkrate = max(parent->max_linkrate, @@ -1012,8 +1010,7 @@ static int sas_ex_discover_dev(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id) sas_add_parent_port(dev, phy_id); return 0; } - if (dev->parent && (SAS_ADDR(ex_phy->attached_sas_addr) == - SAS_ADDR(dev->parent->sas_addr))) { + if (dev->parent && sas_phy_match_dev_addr(dev->parent, ex_phy)) { sas_add_parent_port(dev, phy_id); if (ex_phy->routing_attr == TABLE_ROUTING) sas_configure_phy(dev, phy_id, dev->port->sas_addr, 1); @@ -1312,7 +1309,7 @@ static int sas_check_parent_topology(struct domain_device *child) parent_phy->phy_state == PHY_NOT_PRESENT) continue; - if (SAS_ADDR(parent_phy->attached_sas_addr) != SAS_ADDR(child->sas_addr)) + if (sas_phy_match_dev_addr(child, parent_phy)) continue; child_phy = &child_ex->ex_phy[parent_phy->attached_phy_id]; @@ -1522,8 +1519,7 @@ static int sas_configure_parent(struct domain_device *parent, struct ex_phy *phy = &ex_parent->ex_phy[i]; if ((phy->routing_attr == TABLE_ROUTING) && - (SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr) == - SAS_ADDR(child->sas_addr))) { + sas_phy_match_dev_addr(child, phy)) { res = sas_configure_phy(parent, i, sas_addr, include); if (res) return res; @@ -1858,8 +1854,7 @@ static void sas_unregister_devs_sas_addr(struct domain_device *parent, if (last) { list_for_each_entry_safe(child, n, &ex_dev->children, siblings) { - if (SAS_ADDR(child->sas_addr) == - SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr)) { + if (sas_phy_match_dev_addr(child, phy)) { set_bit(SAS_DEV_GONE, &child->state); if (dev_is_expander(child->dev_type)) sas_unregister_ex_tree(parent->port, child); @@ -1941,8 +1936,7 @@ static int sas_discover_new(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id) if (res) return res; list_for_each_entry(child, &dev->ex_dev.children, siblings) { - if (SAS_ADDR(child->sas_addr) == - SAS_ADDR(ex_phy->attached_sas_addr)) { + if (sas_phy_match_dev_addr(child, ex_phy)) { if (dev_is_expander(child->dev_type)) res = sas_discover_bfs_by_root(child); break;