Message ID | 20201130024615.29171-4-bvanassche@acm.org |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | Rework runtime suspend and SPI domain validation | expand |
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
On 11/30/20 3:46 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > RQF_PREEMPT is used for two different purposes in the legacy IDE code: > 1. To mark power management requests. > 2. To mark requests that should preempt another request. An (old) > explanation of that feature is as follows: > "The IDE driver in the Linux kernel normally uses a series of busywait > delays during its initialization. When the driver executes these > busywaits, the kernel does nothing for the duration of the wait. The > time spent in these waits could be used for other initialization > activities, if they could be run concurrently with these waits. > > More specifically, busywait-style delays such as udelay() in module > init functions inhibit kernel preemption because the Big Kernel Lock > is held, while yielding APIs such as schedule_timeout() allow > preemption. This is true because the kernel handles the BKL specially > and releases and reacquires it across reschedules allowed by the > current thread. > > This IDE-preempt specification requires that the driver eliminate these > busywaits and replace them with a mechanism that allows other work to > proceed while the IDE driver is initializing." > > Since I haven't found an implementation of (2), do not set the PREEMPT > flag for sense requests. This patch causes sense requests to be > postponed while a drive is suspended instead of being submitted to > ide_queue_rq(). > > If it would ever be necessary to restore the IDE PREEMPT functionality, > that can be done by introducing a new flag in struct ide_request. > > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> > Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> > Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> > Cc: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> > Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com> > Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> > --- > drivers/ide/ide-atapi.c | 1 - > drivers/ide/ide-io.c | 5 ----- > 2 files changed, 6 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-atapi.c b/drivers/ide/ide-atapi.c index 2162bc80f09e..013ad33fbbc8 100644 --- a/drivers/ide/ide-atapi.c +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-atapi.c @@ -223,7 +223,6 @@ void ide_prep_sense(ide_drive_t *drive, struct request *rq) sense_rq->rq_disk = rq->rq_disk; sense_rq->cmd_flags = REQ_OP_DRV_IN; ide_req(sense_rq)->type = ATA_PRIV_SENSE; - sense_rq->rq_flags |= RQF_PREEMPT; req->cmd[0] = GPCMD_REQUEST_SENSE; req->cmd[4] = cmd_len; diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c index 1a53c7a75224..c210ea3bd02f 100644 --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c @@ -515,11 +515,6 @@ blk_status_t ide_issue_rq(ide_drive_t *drive, struct request *rq, * above to return us whatever is in the queue. Since we call * ide_do_request() ourselves, we end up taking requests while * the queue is blocked... - * - * We let requests forced at head of queue with ide-preempt - * though. I hope that doesn't happen too much, hopefully not - * unless the subdriver triggers such a thing in its own PM - * state machine. */ if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) && ata_pm_request(rq) == 0 &&
RQF_PREEMPT is used for two different purposes in the legacy IDE code: 1. To mark power management requests. 2. To mark requests that should preempt another request. An (old) explanation of that feature is as follows: "The IDE driver in the Linux kernel normally uses a series of busywait delays during its initialization. When the driver executes these busywaits, the kernel does nothing for the duration of the wait. The time spent in these waits could be used for other initialization activities, if they could be run concurrently with these waits. More specifically, busywait-style delays such as udelay() in module init functions inhibit kernel preemption because the Big Kernel Lock is held, while yielding APIs such as schedule_timeout() allow preemption. This is true because the kernel handles the BKL specially and releases and reacquires it across reschedules allowed by the current thread. This IDE-preempt specification requires that the driver eliminate these busywaits and replace them with a mechanism that allows other work to proceed while the IDE driver is initializing." Since I haven't found an implementation of (2), do not set the PREEMPT flag for sense requests. This patch causes sense requests to be postponed while a drive is suspended instead of being submitted to ide_queue_rq(). If it would ever be necessary to restore the IDE PREEMPT functionality, that can be done by introducing a new flag in struct ide_request. Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Cc: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> --- drivers/ide/ide-atapi.c | 1 - drivers/ide/ide-io.c | 5 ----- 2 files changed, 6 deletions(-)