From patchwork Wed Aug 17 15:20:08 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: John Garry X-Patchwork-Id: 599092 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7434C25B08 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 15:27:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240132AbiHQP0d (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2022 11:26:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34294 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235568AbiHQP0c (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2022 11:26:32 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCA315EDC2; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:26:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fraeml739-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4M7BZ61jJJz67Hfl; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 23:21:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.67) by fraeml739-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.220) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 17:26:28 +0200 Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.69.192.58) by lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 16:26:26 +0100 From: John Garry To: , CC: , , , , , John Garry Subject: [RFT PATCH] ata: libata: Set __ATA_BASE_SHT max_sectors Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 23:20:08 +0800 Message-ID: <1660749608-62897-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.69.192.58] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.67) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Commit 0568e6122574 ("ata: libata-scsi: cap ata_device->max_sectors according to shost->max_sectors") inadvertently capped the max_sectors value for some SATA disks to a value which is lower than we would want. For a device which supports LBA48, we would previously have request queue max_sectors_kb and max_hw_sectors_kb values of 1280 and 32767 respectively. For AHCI controllers, the value chosen for shost max sectors comes from the minimum of the SCSI host default max sectors in SCSI_DEFAULT_MAX_SECTORS (1024) and the shost DMA device mapping limit. This means that we would now set the max_sectors_kb and max_hw_sectors_kb values for a disk which supports LBA48 at 512, ignoring DMA mapping limit. As report by Oliver at [0], this caused a performance regression. Fix by picking a large enough max sectors value for ATA host controllers such that we don't needlessly reduce max_sectors_kb for LBA48 disks. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ide/YvsGbidf3na5FpGb@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/T/#m22d9fc5ad15af66066dd9fecf3d50f1b1ef11da3 Fixes: 0568e6122574 ("ata: libata-scsi: cap ata_device->max_sectors according to shost->max_sectors") Reported-by: Oliver Sang Signed-off-by: John Garry diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h index 0269ff114f5a..698032e5ef2d 100644 --- a/include/linux/libata.h +++ b/include/linux/libata.h @@ -1382,7 +1382,8 @@ extern const struct attribute_group *ata_common_sdev_groups[]; .proc_name = drv_name, \ .slave_destroy = ata_scsi_slave_destroy, \ .bios_param = ata_std_bios_param, \ - .unlock_native_capacity = ata_scsi_unlock_native_capacity + .unlock_native_capacity = ata_scsi_unlock_native_capacity,\ + .max_sectors = ATA_MAX_SECTORS_LBA48 #define ATA_SUBBASE_SHT(drv_name) \ __ATA_BASE_SHT(drv_name), \