Message ID | 20210118163006.61659-1-dgilbert@interlog.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | scatterlist: add new capabilities | expand |
On 2021-01-18 6:27 p.m., David Disseldorp wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 11:30:05 -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > >> After enabling copies between scatter gather lists (sgl_s), another >> storage related operation is to compare two sgl_s. This new function >> is modelled on NVMe's Compare command and the SCSI VERIFY(BYTCHK=1) >> command. Like memcmp() this function returns false on the first >> miscompare and stops comparing. >> >> A helper function called sgl_compare_sgl_idx() is added. It takes an >> additional parameter (miscompare_idx) which is a pointer. If that >> pointer is non-NULL and a miscompare is detected (i.e. the function >> returns false) then the byte index of the first miscompare is written >> to *miscomapre_idx. Knowing the location of the first miscompare is >> needed to implement the SCSI COMPARE AND WRITE command properly. >> >> Reviewed-by: Bodo Stroesser <bostroesser@gmail.com> >> Signed-off-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com> >> --- >> include/linux/scatterlist.h | 8 +++ >> lib/scatterlist.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 117 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/scatterlist.h b/include/linux/scatterlist.h >> index 3f836a3246aa..71be65f9ebb5 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/scatterlist.h >> +++ b/include/linux/scatterlist.h >> @@ -325,6 +325,14 @@ size_t sgl_copy_sgl(struct scatterlist *d_sgl, unsigned int d_nents, off_t d_ski >> struct scatterlist *s_sgl, unsigned int s_nents, off_t s_skip, >> size_t n_bytes); >> >> +bool sgl_compare_sgl(struct scatterlist *x_sgl, unsigned int x_nents, off_t x_skip, >> + struct scatterlist *y_sgl, unsigned int y_nents, off_t y_skip, >> + size_t n_bytes); >> + >> +bool sgl_compare_sgl_idx(struct scatterlist *x_sgl, unsigned int x_nents, off_t x_skip, >> + struct scatterlist *y_sgl, unsigned int y_nents, off_t y_skip, >> + size_t n_bytes, size_t *miscompare_idx); > > > This patch looks good and works fine as a replacement for > compare_and_write_do_cmp(). One minor suggestion would be to name it > sgl_equal() or similar, to perhaps better reflect the bool return and > avoid memcmp() confusion. Either way: > Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de> Thanks. NVMe calls the command that does this Compare and SCSI uses COMPARE AND WRITE (and VERIFY(BYTCHK=1) ) but "equal" is fine with me. There will be another patchset version (at least) so there is time to change. Do you want: - sgl_equal(...), or - sgl_equal_sgl(...) ? Doug Gilbert
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 20:04:20 -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > >> +bool sgl_compare_sgl(struct scatterlist *x_sgl, unsigned int x_nents, off_t x_skip, > >> + struct scatterlist *y_sgl, unsigned int y_nents, off_t y_skip, > >> + size_t n_bytes); > >> + > >> +bool sgl_compare_sgl_idx(struct scatterlist *x_sgl, unsigned int x_nents, off_t x_skip, > >> + struct scatterlist *y_sgl, unsigned int y_nents, off_t y_skip, > >> + size_t n_bytes, size_t *miscompare_idx); > > > > > > This patch looks good and works fine as a replacement for > > compare_and_write_do_cmp(). One minor suggestion would be to name it > > sgl_equal() or similar, to perhaps better reflect the bool return and > > avoid memcmp() confusion. Either way: > > Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de> > > Thanks. NVMe calls the command that does this Compare and SCSI uses > COMPARE AND WRITE (and VERIFY(BYTCHK=1) ) but "equal" is fine with me. > There will be another patchset version (at least) so there is time > to change. > > Do you want: > - sgl_equal(...), or > - sgl_equal_sgl(...) ? I'd probably prefer the former as it's shorter, but I don't feel strongly about it. The latter would make sense if you expect sgl compare helpers for other buffer types. Cheers, David