Message ID | 20200910073952.212130-1-damien.lemoal@wdc.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Improve error handling | expand |
On 2020/09/11 2:48, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 2020-09-10 00:39, Damien Le Moal wrote: >> No need for else after return. >> >> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> >> --- >> drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c >> index 927b1e641842..5f3726abed78 100644 >> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c >> @@ -1755,8 +1755,8 @@ int scsi_noretry_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd) >> if (scmd->request->cmd_flags & REQ_FAILFAST_DEV || >> blk_rq_is_passthrough(scmd->request)) >> return 1; >> - else >> - return 0; >> + >> + return 0; >> } > > Is this patch useful? Is it necessary? Or is it just code churn? Sure, you may consider it code churn, but I prefer the more positive view that it improves code style. And looking at it again, I think the proper change should actually be: return scmd->request->cmd_flags & REQ_FAILFAST_DEV || blk_rq_is_passthrough(scmd->request); A lot cleaner. But no strong feelings. If you really do not like the change, I will drop it. Best regards.