Message ID | 1607520942-22254-1-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Two changes related with UFS clock scaling | expand |
On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 05:35 -0800, Can Guo wrote: > ufshcd_hba_exit() is always called after ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling() > and > ufshcd_exit_clk_gating(), so move ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling/gating() to > ufshcd_hba_exit(). > > Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > index 12266bd..41a12d6 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > @@ -1846,11 +1846,14 @@ static void ufshcd_init_clk_scaling(struct > ufs_hba *hba) > snprintf(wq_name, sizeof(wq_name), "ufs_clkscaling_%d", > hba->host->host_no); > hba->clk_scaling.workq = > create_singlethread_workqueue(wq_name); > + > + hba->clk_scaling.is_initialized = true; > } > > static void ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling(struct ufs_hba *hba) > { > - if (!ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba)) > + if (!ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba) || > + !hba->clk_scaling.is_initialized) > return; > > if (hba->devfreq) > @@ -1894,12 +1897,16 @@ static void ufshcd_init_clk_gating(struct > ufs_hba *hba) > hba->clk_gating.enable_attr.attr.mode = 0644; > if (device_create_file(hba->dev, &hba- > >clk_gating.enable_attr)) > dev_err(hba->dev, "Failed to create sysfs for > clkgate_enable\n"); > + > + hba->clk_gating.is_initialized = true; > } you don't need these two is_initialized at all. they are only be false when scaling/gating is not supported?? Bean
On 2020-12-11 02:03, Bean Huo wrote: > On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 05:35 -0800, Can Guo wrote: >> ufshcd_hba_exit() is always called after ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling() >> and >> ufshcd_exit_clk_gating(), so move ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling/gating() to >> ufshcd_hba_exit(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c >> index 12266bd..41a12d6 100644 >> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c >> @@ -1846,11 +1846,14 @@ static void ufshcd_init_clk_scaling(struct >> ufs_hba *hba) >> snprintf(wq_name, sizeof(wq_name), "ufs_clkscaling_%d", >> hba->host->host_no); >> hba->clk_scaling.workq = >> create_singlethread_workqueue(wq_name); >> + >> + hba->clk_scaling.is_initialized = true; >> } >> >> static void ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling(struct ufs_hba *hba) >> { >> - if (!ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba)) >> + if (!ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba) || >> + !hba->clk_scaling.is_initialized) >> return; >> >> if (hba->devfreq) >> @@ -1894,12 +1897,16 @@ static void ufshcd_init_clk_gating(struct >> ufs_hba *hba) >> hba->clk_gating.enable_attr.attr.mode = 0644; >> if (device_create_file(hba->dev, &hba- >> >clk_gating.enable_attr)) >> dev_err(hba->dev, "Failed to create sysfs for >> clkgate_enable\n"); >> + >> + hba->clk_gating.is_initialized = true; >> } > > you don't need these two is_initialized at all. they are only be false > when scaling/gating is not supported?? > > Bean In the case of scaling/gating are supported, the flags are used in ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling/gating() - when ufshcd_hba_exit() calls ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling/gating(), the two funcs need to make sure they really have something to remove, otherwise NULL pointer issues. Can Guo.