mbox series

[v6,0/4] scsi: Support to handle Intermittent errors

Message ID 1604556596-27228-1-git-send-email-muneendra.kumar@broadcom.com
Headers show
Series scsi: Support to handle Intermittent errors | expand

Message

Muneendra Kumar Nov. 5, 2020, 6:09 a.m. UTC
This patch adds a support to prevent retries of all the
io's after an abort succeeds on a particular device when transport
connectivity to the device is encountering intermittent errors.

Intermittent connectivity is a condition that can be detected by transport
fabric notifications. A service can monitor the ELS notifications and
take action on all the outstanding io's of a scsi device at that instant.

This feature is intended to be used when the device is part of a multipath
environment. When the service detects the poor connectivity, the multipath
path can be placed in a marginal path group and ignored further io
operations.

After placing a path in the marginal path group,the daemon sets the
port_state to Marginal which sets bit in scmd->state for all the
io's on that particular device with the new sysfs interface
provided in this patch.This prevent retries of all the
io's if an io hits a scsi timeout which inturn issues an abort.
On Abort succeeds on a marginal path the io will be immediately retried on
another active path.On abort fails then the things escalates to existing
target reset sg interface recovery process.

Below is the interface provided to set the port state to Marginal
and Online.
echo "Marginal" >> /sys/class/fc_remote_ports/rport-X\:Y-Z/port_state
echo "Online" >> /sys/class/fc_remote_ports/rport-X\:Y-Z/port_state


The patches were cut against  5.10/scsi-queue tree

---
v6:
Reordered the patches to make patch ordering and more logical.

v5:
Added the DID_TRANSPORT_MARGINAL case to scsi_decide_disposition

Made changes to clear the SCMD_NORETRIES_ABORT bit if the port_state
has changed from marginal to online due to port_delete and port_add
as we need the normal cmd retry behaviour while we are calling the
eh handlers.

Made changes in fc_scsi_scan_rport as we are checking FC_PORTSTATE_ONLINE
instead of FC_PORTSTATE_ONLINE and FC_PORTSTATE_MARGINAL


v4:
Made changes in fc_eh_timed_out callout to set the SCMD_NORETRIES_ABORT if port
state is marginal 

With this change, we  removed the code  to loop over running commands
and fc_remote_port_chkready changes to set the SCMD_NORETRIES_ABORT 

Removed the scsi_cmd argument for fc_remote_port_chkready
and reverted back the patches that addressed this change(argument)

Removed unnecessary comments
Handle the return of errors on failure.

v3:
Removed the port_state from starget attributes.
Enabled the store functionality for port_state under remote port
Added a new argument to scsi_cmd  to fc_remote_port_chkready
Used the existing scsi command iterators scsi_host_busy_iter.
Rearranged the patches
Added new patches to add new argument for fc_remote_port_chkready

v2:
Added new error code DID_TRANSPORT_MARGINAL to handle marginal errors.
Added a new rport_state FC_PORTSTATE_MARGINAL and also added a new
sysfs interface port_state to set the port_state to marginal.
Added the support in lpfc to handle the marginal state.



Muneendra (4):
  scsi: Added a new definition in scsi_cmnd.h
  scsi: No retries on abort success
  scsi_transport_fc: Added a new rport state FC_PORTSTATE_MARGINAL
  scsi_transport_fc: Added store fucntionality to set the rport
    port_state using sysfs

 drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c        |  17 +++++
 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c          |   2 +
 drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 include/scsi/scsi.h              |   1 +
 include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h         |   3 +
 include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h |  19 ++++++
 6 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Comments

Mike Christie Nov. 5, 2020, 3:59 p.m. UTC | #1
On 11/5/20 12:09 AM, Muneendra wrote:
>   int fc_block_scsi_eh(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd)
>   {
>   	struct fc_rport *rport = starget_to_rport(scsi_target(cmnd->device));
> +	int ret = 0;
>   
>   	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!rport))
>   		return FAST_IO_FAIL;
>   
> -	return fc_block_rport(rport);
> +	ret = fc_block_rport(rport);
> +	/*
> +	 * Clear the SCMD_NORETRIES_ABORT bit if the Port state has
> +	 * changed from marginal to online due to
> +	 * fc_remote_port_delete and fc_remote_port_add
> +	 */
> +	if (rport->port_state != FC_PORTSTATE_MARGINAL)
> +		clear_bit(SCMD_NORETRIES_ABORT, &cmnd->state);
> +	return ret;
>   }


Hey sorry for the late reply. I was trying to test some things out but 
am not sure if all drivers work the same.

For the code above, what will happen if we have passed that check in the 
driver, then the driver does the report del and add sequence? Let's say 
it's initially calling the abort callout, and we passed that check, we 
then do the del/add seqeuence, what will happen next? Do the fc drivers 
return success or failure for the abort call. What happens for the other 
callouts too?

If failure, then the eh escalates and when we call the next callout, and 
we hit the check above and will clear it, so we are ok.

If success then we would not get a chance to clear it right? If this is 
the case, then I think you need to instead go the route where you add 
the eh cmd completion/decide_disposition callout. You would call it in 
scmd_eh_abort_handler, scsi_eh_bus_device_reset, etc when we are 
deciding if we want to retry/fail the command. In this approach you do 
not need the eh_timed_out changes, since we only seem to care about the 
port state after the eh callout has completed.
Muneendra Kumar Nov. 5, 2020, 5:27 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the input.
Below are my replies.


>Hey sorry for the late reply. I was trying to test some things out but am

>not sure if all drivers work the same.


>For the code above, what will happen if we have passed that check in the

>driver, then the driver does the report del and add sequence? Let's say

>it's initially calling the abort callout, and we passed that check, we then

>do the >del/add seqeuence, what will happen next? Do the fc drivers return

>success or failure for the abort call. What happens for the other callouts

>too?


>If failure, then the eh escalates and when we call the next callout, and we

>hit the check above and will clear it, so we are ok.


If success then we would not get a chance to clear it right?
[Muneendra]Agreed. So what about clearing the flags in fc_remote_port_del. I
think this should address all the concerns?

> If this is the case, then I think you need to instead go the route where

> you add the eh cmd completion/decide_disposition callout. You would call

> it in scmd_eh_abort_handler, scsi_eh_bus_device_reset, etc when we are

> deciding if we want to retry/fail the command.

[Muneendra]Sorry I didn't get what you are saying could you please elaborate
on the same.

In this approach you do not need the eh_timed_out changes, since we only
seem to care about the port state after the eh callout has completed.
[Muneendra]what about setting the SCMD_NORETRIES_ABORT bit?

Regards,
Muneendra.
Mike Christie Nov. 5, 2020, 7:15 p.m. UTC | #3
On 11/5/20 11:27 AM, Muneendra Kumar M wrote:
> Hi Mike,

> Thanks for the input.

> Below are my replies.

> 

> 

>> Hey sorry for the late reply. I was trying to test some things out but am

>> not sure if all drivers work the same.

> 

>> For the code above, what will happen if we have passed that check in the

>> driver, then the driver does the report del and add sequence? Let's say

>> it's initially calling the abort callout, and we passed that check, we then

>> do the >del/add seqeuence, what will happen next? Do the fc drivers return

>> success or failure for the abort call. What happens for the other callouts

>> too?

> 

>> If failure, then the eh escalates and when we call the next callout, and we

>> hit the check above and will clear it, so we are ok.

> 

> If success then we would not get a chance to clear it right?

> [Muneendra]Agreed. So what about clearing the flags in fc_remote_port_del. I

> think this should address all the concerns?

> 

>> If this is the case, then I think you need to instead go the route where

>> you add the eh cmd completion/decide_disposition callout. You would call

>> it in scmd_eh_abort_handler, scsi_eh_bus_device_reset, etc when we are

>> deciding if we want to retry/fail the command.

> [Muneendra]Sorry I didn't get what you are saying could you please elaborate

> on the same.

> 

> In this approach you do not need the eh_timed_out changes, since we only

> seem to care about the port state after the eh callout has completed.

> [Muneendra]what about setting the SCMD_NORETRIES_ABORT bit?

> 


I don't think you need it. It sounds like we only care about the port state
when the cmd is completing. For example we have:

1. the case where the cmd times out, we do aborts/resets, then the
port state goes into marginal, then the aborts/resets complete. We want to
fail the cmds without retries.

2. If the port state is in marginal, the cmd times out, we do the aborts/resets
and when we are done if the port state is still marginal we want to fail the
cmd without retries.

3. If the port state is marginal (or any value), before or after the cmd
initially times out, but the port state goes back to online, then when the
aborts/resets complete we want to retry the cmd.

So can we just add a callout to check the port state when the eh has completed
like the untested unfinished patch below:


diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
index 983eeb0..8ad3a9a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
@@ -6041,6 +6041,7 @@ struct scsi_host_template lpfc_template = {
 	.info			= lpfc_info,
 	.queuecommand		= lpfc_queuecommand,
 	.eh_timed_out		= fc_eh_timed_out,
+	.eh_timed_out		= fc_eh_should_retry_cmd,
 	.eh_abort_handler	= lpfc_abort_handler,
 	.eh_device_reset_handler = lpfc_device_reset_handler,
 	.eh_target_reset_handler = lpfc_target_reset_handler,
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
index f11f51e..7c66d17 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ static bool scsi_cmd_retry_allowed(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
 	struct scsi_cmnd *scmd =
 		container_of(work, struct scsi_cmnd, abort_work.work);
 	struct scsi_device *sdev = scmd->device;
+	struct Scsi_Host *host = sdev->host;
 	int rtn;
 
 	if (scsi_host_eh_past_deadline(sdev->host)) {
@@ -159,7 +160,8 @@ static bool scsi_cmd_retry_allowed(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
 						    "eh timeout, not retrying "
 						    "aborted command\n"));
 			} else if (!scsi_noretry_cmd(scmd) &&
-				   scsi_cmd_retry_allowed(scmd)) {
+				   scsi_cmd_retry_allowed(scmd) &&
+				   host->hostt->eh_should_retry_cmd(scmd)) {
 				SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
 					scmd_printk(KERN_WARNING, scmd,
 						    "retry aborted command\n"));
@@ -2105,7 +2107,8 @@ void scsi_eh_flush_done_q(struct list_head *done_q)
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(scmd, next, done_q, eh_entry) {
 		list_del_init(&scmd->eh_entry);
 		if (scsi_device_online(scmd->device) &&
-		    !scsi_noretry_cmd(scmd) && scsi_cmd_retry_allowed(scmd)) {
+		    !scsi_noretry_cmd(scmd) && scsi_cmd_retry_allowed(scmd) &&
+		    host->hostt->eh_should_retry_cmd(scmd)) {
 			SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
 				scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, scmd,
 					     "%s: flush retry cmd\n",
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
index 2ff7f06..7011963 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
@@ -2043,6 +2043,18 @@ static int fc_vport_match(struct attribute_container *cont,
 	return &i->vport_attr_cont.ac == cont;
 }
 
+bool fc_eh_should_retry_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
+{
+	struct fc_rport *rport = starget_to_rport(scsi_target(scmd->device));
+
+	if (rport->port_state == FC_PORTSTATE_MARGINAL)
+		return false;
+
+	/* Other port states will set the sdev state */
+	/* TODO check comment above */ 
+	return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fc_eh_should_retry_cmd);
 
 /**
  * fc_eh_timed_out - FC Transport I/O timeout intercept handler
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
index 701f178..51d5af0 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
@@ -315,6 +315,13 @@ struct scsi_host_template {
 	 */
 	enum blk_eh_timer_return (*eh_timed_out)(struct scsi_cmnd *);
 
+	/*
+	 * Optional routine that allows the transport to decide if a cmd is
+	 * retryable. Return true if the transport is in a state the cmd
+	 * should be retried on.
+	 */
+	bool (*eh_should_retry_cmd)(struct scsi_cmnd *);
+
 	/* This is an optional routine that allows transport to initiate
 	 * LLD adapter or firmware reset using sysfs attribute.
 	 *
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h b/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h
index 1c7dd35..f21b583 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h
@@ -803,6 +803,7 @@ struct fc_vport *fc_vport_create(struct Scsi_Host *shost, int channel,
 int fc_block_rport(struct fc_rport *rport);
 int fc_block_scsi_eh(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd);
 enum blk_eh_timer_return fc_eh_timed_out(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd);
+bool fc_eh_should_retry_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd);
 
 static inline struct Scsi_Host *fc_bsg_to_shost(struct bsg_job *job)
 {
Muneendra Kumar Nov. 5, 2020, 8:01 p.m. UTC | #4
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the detailed input.
I will apply the below changes and will resubmit the patches.

Regards,
Muneendra.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Christie [mailto:michael.christie@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 9:29 PM
To: Muneendra <muneendra.kumar@broadcom.com>; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org;
hare@suse.de
Cc: jsmart2021@gmail.com; emilne@redhat.com; mkumar@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] scsi_transport_fc: Added a new rport state
FC_PORTSTATE_MARGINAL

On 11/5/20 12:09 AM, Muneendra wrote:
>   int fc_block_scsi_eh(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd)
>   {
>   	struct fc_rport *rport =
> starget_to_rport(scsi_target(cmnd->device));
> +	int ret = 0;
>
>   	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!rport))
>   		return FAST_IO_FAIL;
>
> -	return fc_block_rport(rport);
> +	ret = fc_block_rport(rport);
> +	/*
> +	 * Clear the SCMD_NORETRIES_ABORT bit if the Port state has
> +	 * changed from marginal to online due to
> +	 * fc_remote_port_delete and fc_remote_port_add
> +	 */
> +	if (rport->port_state != FC_PORTSTATE_MARGINAL)
> +		clear_bit(SCMD_NORETRIES_ABORT, &cmnd->state);
> +	return ret;
>   }


Hey sorry for the late reply. I was trying to test some things out but am
not sure if all drivers work the same.

For the code above, what will happen if we have passed that check in the
driver, then the driver does the report del and add sequence? Let's say it's
initially calling the abort callout, and we passed that check, we then do
the del/add seqeuence, what will happen next? Do the fc drivers return
success or failure for the abort call. What happens for the other callouts
too?

If failure, then the eh escalates and when we call the next callout, and we
hit the check above and will clear it, so we are ok.

If success then we would not get a chance to clear it right? If this is the
case, then I think you need to instead go the route where you add the eh cmd
completion/decide_disposition callout. You would call it in
scmd_eh_abort_handler, scsi_eh_bus_device_reset, etc when we are deciding if
we want to retry/fail the command. In this approach you do not need the
eh_timed_out changes, since we only seem to care about the port state after
the eh callout has completed.
Muneendra Kumar Nov. 5, 2020, 8:02 p.m. UTC | #5
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the detailed input.
I will apply the below changes and will resubmit the patches.

Regards,
Muneendra.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Christie [mailto:michael.christie@oracle.com]

Sent: Friday, November 6, 2020 12:46 AM
To: Muneendra Kumar M <muneendra.kumar@broadcom.com>;
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; hare@suse.de
Cc: jsmart2021@gmail.com; emilne@redhat.com; mkumar@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] scsi_transport_fc: Added a new rport state
FC_PORTSTATE_MARGINAL

On 11/5/20 11:27 AM, Muneendra Kumar M wrote:
> Hi Mike,

> Thanks for the input.

> Below are my replies.

>

>

>> Hey sorry for the late reply. I was trying to test some things out

>> but am not sure if all drivers work the same.

>

>> For the code above, what will happen if we have passed that check in

>> the driver, then the driver does the report del and add sequence?

>> Let's say it's initially calling the abort callout, and we passed

>> that check, we then do the >del/add seqeuence, what will happen next?

>> Do the fc drivers return success or failure for the abort call. What

>> happens for the other callouts too?

>

>> If failure, then the eh escalates and when we call the next callout,

>> and we hit the check above and will clear it, so we are ok.

>

> If success then we would not get a chance to clear it right?

> [Muneendra]Agreed. So what about clearing the flags in

> fc_remote_port_del. I think this should address all the concerns?

>

>> If this is the case, then I think you need to instead go the route

>> where you add the eh cmd completion/decide_disposition callout. You

>> would call it in scmd_eh_abort_handler, scsi_eh_bus_device_reset, etc

>> when we are deciding if we want to retry/fail the command.

> [Muneendra]Sorry I didn't get what you are saying could you please

> elaborate on the same.

>

> In this approach you do not need the eh_timed_out changes, since we

> only seem to care about the port state after the eh callout has completed.

> [Muneendra]what about setting the SCMD_NORETRIES_ABORT bit?

>


I don't think you need it. It sounds like we only care about the port state
when the cmd is completing. For example we have:

1. the case where the cmd times out, we do aborts/resets, then the port
state goes into marginal, then the aborts/resets complete. We want to fail
the cmds without retries.

2. If the port state is in marginal, the cmd times out, we do the
aborts/resets and when we are done if the port state is still marginal we
want to fail the cmd without retries.

3. If the port state is marginal (or any value), before or after the cmd
initially times out, but the port state goes back to online, then when the
aborts/resets complete we want to retry the cmd.

So can we just add a callout to check the port state when the eh has
completed like the untested unfinished patch below:


diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
index 983eeb0..8ad3a9a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
@@ -6041,6 +6041,7 @@ struct scsi_host_template lpfc_template = {
 	.info			= lpfc_info,
 	.queuecommand		= lpfc_queuecommand,
 	.eh_timed_out		= fc_eh_timed_out,
+	.eh_timed_out		= fc_eh_should_retry_cmd,
 	.eh_abort_handler	= lpfc_abort_handler,
 	.eh_device_reset_handler = lpfc_device_reset_handler,
 	.eh_target_reset_handler = lpfc_target_reset_handler, diff --git
a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c index
f11f51e..7c66d17 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ static bool scsi_cmd_retry_allowed(struct scsi_cmnd
*cmd)
 	struct scsi_cmnd *scmd =
 		container_of(work, struct scsi_cmnd, abort_work.work);
 	struct scsi_device *sdev = scmd->device;
+	struct Scsi_Host *host = sdev->host;
 	int rtn;

 	if (scsi_host_eh_past_deadline(sdev->host)) { @@ -159,7 +160,8 @@ static
bool scsi_cmd_retry_allowed(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
 						    "eh timeout, not retrying "
 						    "aborted command\n"));
 			} else if (!scsi_noretry_cmd(scmd) &&
-				   scsi_cmd_retry_allowed(scmd)) {
+				   scsi_cmd_retry_allowed(scmd) &&
+				   host->hostt->eh_should_retry_cmd(scmd)) {
 				SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
 					scmd_printk(KERN_WARNING, scmd,
 						    "retry aborted command\n"));
@@ -2105,7 +2107,8 @@ void scsi_eh_flush_done_q(struct list_head *done_q)
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(scmd, next, done_q, eh_entry) {
 		list_del_init(&scmd->eh_entry);
 		if (scsi_device_online(scmd->device) &&
-		    !scsi_noretry_cmd(scmd) && scsi_cmd_retry_allowed(scmd)) {
+		    !scsi_noretry_cmd(scmd) && scsi_cmd_retry_allowed(scmd) &&
+		    host->hostt->eh_should_retry_cmd(scmd)) {
 			SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
 				scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, scmd,
 					     "%s: flush retry cmd\n",
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
index 2ff7f06..7011963 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
@@ -2043,6 +2043,18 @@ static int fc_vport_match(struct attribute_container
*cont,
 	return &i->vport_attr_cont.ac == cont;  }

+bool fc_eh_should_retry_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd) {
+	struct fc_rport *rport = starget_to_rport(scsi_target(scmd->device));
+
+	if (rport->port_state == FC_PORTSTATE_MARGINAL)
+		return false;
+
+	/* Other port states will set the sdev state */
+	/* TODO check comment above */
+	return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fc_eh_should_retry_cmd);

 /**
  * fc_eh_timed_out - FC Transport I/O timeout intercept handler diff --git
a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h index 701f178..51d5af0
100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
@@ -315,6 +315,13 @@ struct scsi_host_template {
 	 */
 	enum blk_eh_timer_return (*eh_timed_out)(struct scsi_cmnd *);

+	/*
+	 * Optional routine that allows the transport to decide if a cmd is
+	 * retryable. Return true if the transport is in a state the cmd
+	 * should be retried on.
+	 */
+	bool (*eh_should_retry_cmd)(struct scsi_cmnd *);
+
 	/* This is an optional routine that allows transport to initiate
 	 * LLD adapter or firmware reset using sysfs attribute.
 	 *
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h
b/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h
index 1c7dd35..f21b583 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h
@@ -803,6 +803,7 @@ struct fc_vport *fc_vport_create(struct Scsi_Host
*shost, int channel,  int fc_block_rport(struct fc_rport *rport);  int
fc_block_scsi_eh(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd);  enum blk_eh_timer_return
fc_eh_timed_out(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd);
+bool fc_eh_should_retry_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd);

 static inline struct Scsi_Host *fc_bsg_to_shost(struct bsg_job *job)  {
Hannes Reinecke Nov. 6, 2020, 7:23 a.m. UTC | #6
On 11/5/20 8:15 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 11/5/20 11:27 AM, Muneendra Kumar M wrote:

>> Hi Mike,

>> Thanks for the input.

>> Below are my replies.

>>

>>

>>> Hey sorry for the late reply. I was trying to test some things out but am

>>> not sure if all drivers work the same.

>>

>>> For the code above, what will happen if we have passed that check in the

>>> driver, then the driver does the report del and add sequence? Let's say

>>> it's initially calling the abort callout, and we passed that check, we then

>>> do the >del/add seqeuence, what will happen next? Do the fc drivers return

>>> success or failure for the abort call. What happens for the other callouts

>>> too?

>>

>>> If failure, then the eh escalates and when we call the next callout, and we

>>> hit the check above and will clear it, so we are ok.

>>

>> If success then we would not get a chance to clear it right?

>> [Muneendra]Agreed. So what about clearing the flags in fc_remote_port_del. I

>> think this should address all the concerns?

>>

>>> If this is the case, then I think you need to instead go the route where

>>> you add the eh cmd completion/decide_disposition callout. You would call

>>> it in scmd_eh_abort_handler, scsi_eh_bus_device_reset, etc when we are

>>> deciding if we want to retry/fail the command.

>> [Muneendra]Sorry I didn't get what you are saying could you please elaborate

>> on the same.

>>

>> In this approach you do not need the eh_timed_out changes, since we only

>> seem to care about the port state after the eh callout has completed.

>> [Muneendra]what about setting the SCMD_NORETRIES_ABORT bit?

>>

> 

> I don't think you need it. It sounds like we only care about the port state

> when the cmd is completing. For example we have:

> 

> 1. the case where the cmd times out, we do aborts/resets, then the

> port state goes into marginal, then the aborts/resets complete. We want to

> fail the cmds without retries.

> 

> 2. If the port state is in marginal, the cmd times out, we do the aborts/resets

> and when we are done if the port state is still marginal we want to fail the

> cmd without retries.

> 

> 3. If the port state is marginal (or any value), before or after the cmd

> initially times out, but the port state goes back to online, then when the

> aborts/resets complete we want to retry the cmd.

> 

Actually, I don't think the third case can (or should) happen.
A transition from marginal to online should always include a link bounce 
(ie a rport_del/rport_add sequence), which would cancel all outstanding 
commands anyway.
And if we have the above provision we could clear the flag in 
rport_del() and everything would be dandy.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de                              +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
Mike Christie Nov. 7, 2020, 1:18 a.m. UTC | #7
On 11/6/20 1:23 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 11/5/20 8:15 PM, Mike Christie wrote:

>> On 11/5/20 11:27 AM, Muneendra Kumar M wrote:

>>> Hi Mike,

>>> Thanks for the input.

>>> Below are my replies.

>>>

>>>

>>>> Hey sorry for the late reply. I was trying to test some things out but am

>>>> not sure if all drivers work the same.

>>>

>>>> For the code above, what will happen if we have passed that check in the

>>>> driver, then the driver does the report del and add sequence? Let's say

>>>> it's initially calling the abort callout, and we passed that check, we then

>>>> do the >del/add seqeuence, what will happen next? Do the fc drivers return

>>>> success or failure for the abort call. What happens for the other callouts

>>>> too?

>>>

>>>> If failure, then the eh escalates and when we call the next callout, and we

>>>> hit the check above and will clear it, so we are ok.

>>>

>>> If success then we would not get a chance to clear it right?

>>> [Muneendra]Agreed. So what about clearing the flags in fc_remote_port_del. I

>>> think this should address all the concerns?

>>>

>>>> If this is the case, then I think you need to instead go the route where

>>>> you add the eh cmd completion/decide_disposition callout. You would call

>>>> it in scmd_eh_abort_handler, scsi_eh_bus_device_reset, etc when we are

>>>> deciding if we want to retry/fail the command.

>>> [Muneendra]Sorry I didn't get what you are saying could you please elaborate

>>> on the same.

>>>

>>> In this approach you do not need the eh_timed_out changes, since we only

>>> seem to care about the port state after the eh callout has completed.

>>> [Muneendra]what about setting the SCMD_NORETRIES_ABORT bit?

>>>

>>

>> I don't think you need it. It sounds like we only care about the port state

>> when the cmd is completing. For example we have:

>>

>> 1. the case where the cmd times out, we do aborts/resets, then the

>> port state goes into marginal, then the aborts/resets complete. We want to

>> fail the cmds without retries.

>>

>> 2. If the port state is in marginal, the cmd times out, we do the aborts/resets

>> and when we are done if the port state is still marginal we want to fail the

>> cmd without retries.

>>

>> 3. If the port state is marginal (or any value), before or after the cmd

>> initially times out, but the port state goes back to online, then when the

>> aborts/resets complete we want to retry the cmd.

>>

> Actually, I don't think the third case can (or should) happen.

> A transition from marginal to online should always include a link bounce (ie a rport_del/rport_add sequence), which would cancel all outstanding commands anyway.

> And if we have the above provision we could clear the flag in rport_del() and everything would be dandy.


That is the part I didn't like or I thought could have issues:

1. What if we go back into marginal after the add() but before we have done scsi_eh_flush_done_q? You need the original looping code and some code for del() right?

2. My issue with #1 is why do we want to add code that loops over commands when we only care about the port state and when scsi_eh_flush_done_q and the abort completion code is already looping over them.

3. This is probably a matter of preference, and I can see why people would not like an extra callout. However, I like the idea that we have an eh callout for the transport class that checks if it's even worth it to run the eh code based on the port state and then we have a eh completion callout that can also check the port state and determine if it's ok.

If we had a marginal scsi_device state or even a bit then you would not actually need #3. The fc class could just set the device state/bit and we could check that in the eh completion code paths.