From patchwork Fri Feb 21 21:24:45 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tom Zanussi X-Patchwork-Id: 213212 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39474C3566F for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 21:26:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F93124650 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 21:26:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582320377; bh=hfjqjbH/69XjOXVTFuEk8cVS7pwRb367c/FI/hNju5Y=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To: References:List-ID:From; b=lHoFVqPOIgdPFf+WuStJP/lt9osj/La+RD3hfwakDtHL9r4knuvH8vlN48pyZ4J9u UJZZiXha/uXlJ0J+VAXCO6nfT2KYbU+w28W83QSQv6uXgndQL2taSI7xHlqb66PCaV OL9M2ep+ho3QHA0meTi4t69ziUVCuyFhripgYzEg= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729806AbgBUV0N (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:26:13 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:39328 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729518AbgBUVZc (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:25:32 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-98-220-238-81.hsd1.il.comcast.net [98.220.238.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B1BD24687; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 21:25:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582320331; bh=hfjqjbH/69XjOXVTFuEk8cVS7pwRb367c/FI/hNju5Y=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To: References:From; b=BQTSZZYRCvqt/Gc6DKFHb7lQsz3gVxVvy5tCdDbqFkYXAjDg46yKonzu/BQklzMgO BkoiZ2dVAL4hAo2c/arGDPJ/1fO6YOSvt3mVjeq8wyq1CKijxfF1ImapPooCzMV9/L DbOzHsCWRfDQKhM0N5GyrcAY6Cc+0SIidvt/nEbE= From: zanussi@kernel.org To: LKML , linux-rt-users , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , Carsten Emde , John Kacur , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Daniel Wagner , Tom Zanussi Subject: [PATCH RT 17/25] x86/fpu: Don't cache access to fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:24:45 -0600 Message-Id: <25549e4ff2e5d78e663cf6e5cd8ed108ef03ff44.1582320278.git.zanussi@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.1 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior v4.14.170-rt75-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ----------- [ Upstream commit eb46d70e4455e49928f136f768f1e54646ab4ff7 ] The state/owner of the FPU is saved to fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx by pointing to the context that is currently loaded. It never changed during the lifetime of a task - it remained stable/constant. After deferred FPU registers loading until return to userland was implemented, the content of fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx may change during preemption and must not be cached. This went unnoticed for some time and was now noticed, in particular since gcc 9 is caching that load in copy_fpstate_to_sigframe() and reusing it in the retry loop: copy_fpstate_to_sigframe() load fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx and save on stack fpregs_lock() copy_fpregs_to_sigframe() /* failed */ fpregs_unlock() *** PREEMPTION, another uses FPU, changes fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx *** fault_in_pages_writeable() /* succeed, retry */ fpregs_lock() __fpregs_load_activate() fpregs_state_valid() /* uses fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx from stack */ copy_fpregs_to_sigframe() /* succeeds, random FPU content */ This is a comparison of the assembly produced by gcc 9, without vs with this patch: | # arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c:173: if (!access_ok(buf, size)) | cmpq %rdx, %rax # tmp183, _4 | jb .L190 #, |-# arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h:512: return fpu == this_cpu_read_stable(fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx) && cpu == fpu->last_cpu; |-#APP |-# 512 "arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h" 1 |- movq %gs:fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx,%rax #, pfo_ret__ |-# 0 "" 2 |-#NO_APP |- movq %rax, -88(%rbp) # pfo_ret__, %sfp … |-# arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h:512: return fpu == this_cpu_read_stable(fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx) && cpu == fpu->last_cpu; |- movq -88(%rbp), %rcx # %sfp, pfo_ret__ |- cmpq %rcx, -64(%rbp) # pfo_ret__, %sfp |+# arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h:512: return fpu == this_cpu_read(fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx) && cpu == fpu->last_cpu; |+#APP |+# 512 "arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h" 1 |+ movq %gs:fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx(%rip),%rax # fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx, pfo_ret__ |+# 0 "" 2 |+# arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h:512: return fpu == this_cpu_read(fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx) && cpu == fpu->last_cpu; |+#NO_APP |+ cmpq %rax, -64(%rbp) # pfo_ret__, %sfp Use this_cpu_read() instead this_cpu_read_stable() to avoid caching of fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx during preemption points. The Fixes: tag points to the commit where deferred FPU loading was added. Since this commit, the compiler is no longer allowed to move the load of fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx somewhere else / outside of the locked section. A task preemption will change its value and stale content will be observed. [ bp: Massage. ] Debugged-by: Austin Clements Debugged-by: David Chase Debugged-by: Ian Lance Taylor Fixes: 5f409e20b7945 ("x86/fpu: Defer FPU state load until return to userspace") Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel Tested-by: Borislav Petkov Cc: Aubrey Li Cc: Austin Clements Cc: Barret Rhoden Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: David Chase Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: ian@airs.com Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Josh Bleecher Snyder Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: x86-ml Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191128085306.hxfa2o3knqtu4wfn@linutronix.de Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205663 Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h index fa2c93cb42a2..92e12f5d0d64 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static inline void __fpu_invalidate_fpregs_state(struct fpu *fpu) static inline int fpregs_state_valid(struct fpu *fpu, unsigned int cpu) { - return fpu == this_cpu_read_stable(fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx) && cpu == fpu->last_cpu; + return fpu == this_cpu_read(fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx) && cpu == fpu->last_cpu; } /*