Message ID | 20230605151133.2615-5-mario.limonciello@amd.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Enable amd-pstate active mode by default | expand |
Hi Mario, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on rafael-pm/linux-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.4-rc6 next-20230613] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mario-Limonciello/ACPI-CPPC-Add-a-symbol-to-check-if-the-preferred-profile-is-a-server/20230605-231602 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605151133.2615-5-mario.limonciello%40amd.com patch subject: [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use the acpi_pm_profile_server() symbol config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-r006-20230612 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230613/202306131736.HZQ9caR6-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 15.0.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 8dfdcc7b7bf66834a761bd8de445840ef68e4d1a) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): mkdir -p ~/bin wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross git remote add rafael-pm https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git git fetch rafael-pm linux-next git checkout rafael-pm/linux-next b4 shazam https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605151133.2615-5-mario.limonciello@amd.com # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang ~/bin/make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 olddefconfig COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang ~/bin/make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/cpufreq/ If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306131736.HZQ9caR6-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:2397:8: error: call to undeclared function 'acpi_pm_profile_server'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] if (acpi_pm_profile_server()) ^ 1 error generated. vim +/acpi_pm_profile_server +2397 drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c 2376 2377 static int intel_pstate_init_cpu(unsigned int cpunum) 2378 { 2379 struct cpudata *cpu; 2380 2381 cpu = all_cpu_data[cpunum]; 2382 2383 if (!cpu) { 2384 cpu = kzalloc(sizeof(*cpu), GFP_KERNEL); 2385 if (!cpu) 2386 return -ENOMEM; 2387 2388 WRITE_ONCE(all_cpu_data[cpunum], cpu); 2389 2390 cpu->cpu = cpunum; 2391 2392 cpu->epp_default = -EINVAL; 2393 2394 if (hwp_active) { 2395 intel_pstate_hwp_enable(cpu); 2396 > 2397 if (acpi_pm_profile_server()) 2398 hwp_boost = true; 2399 } 2400 } else if (hwp_active) { 2401 /* 2402 * Re-enable HWP in case this happens after a resume from ACPI 2403 * S3 if the CPU was offline during the whole system/resume 2404 * cycle. 2405 */ 2406 intel_pstate_hwp_reenable(cpu); 2407 } 2408 2409 cpu->epp_powersave = -EINVAL; 2410 cpu->epp_policy = 0; 2411 2412 intel_pstate_get_cpu_pstates(cpu); 2413 2414 pr_debug("controlling: cpu %d\n", cpunum); 2415 2416 return 0; 2417 } 2418
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c index 2548ec92faa2..3a36c0169d82 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c @@ -313,18 +313,9 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(intel_pstate_limits_lock); #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI -static bool intel_pstate_acpi_pm_profile_server(void) -{ - if (acpi_gbl_FADT.preferred_profile == PM_ENTERPRISE_SERVER || - acpi_gbl_FADT.preferred_profile == PM_PERFORMANCE_SERVER) - return true; - - return false; -} - static bool intel_pstate_get_ppc_enable_status(void) { - if (intel_pstate_acpi_pm_profile_server()) + if (acpi_pm_profile_server()) return true; return acpi_ppc; @@ -481,10 +472,6 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_exit_perf_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { } -static inline bool intel_pstate_acpi_pm_profile_server(void) -{ - return false; -} #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */ #ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB @@ -2407,7 +2394,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_init_cpu(unsigned int cpunum) if (hwp_active) { intel_pstate_hwp_enable(cpu); - if (intel_pstate_acpi_pm_profile_server()) + if (acpi_pm_profile_server()) hwp_boost = true; } } else if (hwp_active) {