| Message ID | 20221018-up-i350-thermal-bringup-v8-5-23e8fbb08837@baylibre.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | thermal: mediatek: Add support for MT8365 SoC | expand |
Hi Daniel, On 1/25/23 11:58, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 25/01/2023 10:50, Amjad Ouled-Ameur wrote: >> In mtk_thermal_bank_temperature, return -EAGAIN instead of 0 >> on the first read of sensor that often are bogus values. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Kao <michael.kao@mediatek.com> >> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org> >> Signed-off-by: Amjad Ouled-Ameur <aouledameur@baylibre.com> >> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> >> --- >> drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c >> index b8e06f6c7c42..e7be450cd40a 100644 >> --- a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c >> @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ static int mtk_thermal_bank_temperature(struct mtk_thermal_bank *bank) >> * not immediately shut down. >> */ >> if (temp > 200000) >> - temp = 0; >> + temp = -EAGAIN; > > Did you try to add a delay between the bank init and the thermal zone device register (eg. 1ms) ? > > May be the HW did not have time to initialize and capture a temperature before thermal_zone_device_register() is called (this one calls get_temp) ? A delay of 29 ms actually fixed the issue, thanks for the suggestion. I can send a V9 with this improvement. Is there anything else to fix perhaps ? Regards, Amjad > >> if (temp > max) >> max = temp; >> >
Hi Amjad, On 27/01/2023 11:50, Amjad Ouled-Ameur wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 1/25/23 11:58, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 25/01/2023 10:50, Amjad Ouled-Ameur wrote: >>> In mtk_thermal_bank_temperature, return -EAGAIN instead of 0 >>> on the first read of sensor that often are bogus values. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michael Kao <michael.kao@mediatek.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Amjad Ouled-Ameur <aouledameur@baylibre.com> >>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno >>> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c >>> b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c >>> index b8e06f6c7c42..e7be450cd40a 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c >>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c >>> @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ static int mtk_thermal_bank_temperature(struct >>> mtk_thermal_bank *bank) >>> * not immediately shut down. >>> */ >>> if (temp > 200000) >>> - temp = 0; >>> + temp = -EAGAIN; >> >> Did you try to add a delay between the bank init and the thermal zone >> device register (eg. 1ms) ? >> >> May be the HW did not have time to initialize and capture a >> temperature before thermal_zone_device_register() is called (this one >> calls get_temp) ? > > A delay of 29 ms actually fixed the issue, thanks for the suggestion. I > can send a V9 with this improvement. I'm glad that helped. Will you remove the "if (temp > 200000)" test ? > Is there anything else to fix perhaps ? Not in your changes Thanks -- Daniel
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c index b8e06f6c7c42..e7be450cd40a 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ static int mtk_thermal_bank_temperature(struct mtk_thermal_bank *bank) * not immediately shut down. */ if (temp > 200000) - temp = 0; + temp = -EAGAIN; if (temp > max) max = temp;