From patchwork Tue Sep 27 16:49:21 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Evan Green X-Patchwork-Id: 609945 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA45AC6FA82 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:51:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232053AbiI0Qvu (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 12:51:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50470 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232792AbiI0Qun (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 12:50:43 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com (mail-pl1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8606613CC8 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:50:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id d11so9598662pll.8 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:50:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=p+EwdeqCoE27EgkHyCYpqbbvZj82cYcu+QCeLhfwJXs=; b=aUL0i1ZYy8YBSietWoW55lkWRiA6ms2vaAGiwhHLSHfFYLJGBYVuEu1KknbIzTmLIu 3tdKkYnE/QPVoN9ri1hM7KskuvlVA8EFWSdvnEJuUCSz3dmDugvG5op0xEABb8KrIkhb Jj0ZosfPt3fXaPg0Dyoir6cAAJqLTfyGzA5vY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=p+EwdeqCoE27EgkHyCYpqbbvZj82cYcu+QCeLhfwJXs=; b=nA5XTGPjqrFYLXltmEE7EY2ddiqKNDKNTegVuVoeSMrB8VXKhaZKe5+G5opQbU7+mK XveMKYOCF86nfozjnJnLynx6SwZwxlZF/4M7GHj8KkGaVRopNknZnv9Mn6Fc6/zc6qsq 8v43PZT+AdHpN73smbpPBuktRvbRFP6b7GJ83n4FkGAgMPRwmV4T7JlCG/xKjIP5bEoV UbGDfHBe6e3i8P7LSljvYJB2xjrTq7OylolfJV72KVuSApf5UMDJ1kIQCEBuOp898xjJ hHFkHAC9Sc5iabo3qpw/LSk7MzYbtNF9WyrF1T7Y27NmYHWgSzfFxUVVrkIaXqGEfZ1o qidg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2G2MzEWtgPv3qtxw2MtkxxZr0lUnaNVabZb7m/441HCf/2XIhY L0NtSRB1lr0NUcLaVoOr5XaE2g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7agmtrs6Ny/a0L+p0JUaTQ87FYX8wWIlXIJvozMPPix5xwPGbzifp0Pm/ltBxODYj5CxqiHA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:4607:b0:202:e22d:489c with SMTP id w7-20020a17090a460700b00202e22d489cmr5620580pjg.80.1664297428055; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:50:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from evgreen-glaptop.lan ([73.231.74.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p13-20020a63950d000000b00434272fe870sm1753509pgd.88.2022.09.27.09.50.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:50:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Evan Green To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, apronin@chromium.org, dlunev@google.com, jarkko@kernel.org, Pavel Machek , Ben Boeckel , rjw@rjwysocki.net, corbet@lwn.net, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.ibm.com, Kees Cook , Eric Biggers , jejb@linux.ibm.com, gwendal@chromium.org, Matthew Garrett , Evan Green , Matthew Garrett , Len Brown , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: [PATCH v3 10/11] PM: hibernate: Verify the digest encryption key Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:49:21 -0700 Message-Id: <20220927094559.v3.10.I504d456c7a94ef1aaa7a2c63775ce9690c3ad7ab@changeid> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.0 In-Reply-To: <20220927164922.3383711-1-evgreen@chromium.org> References: <20220927164922.3383711-1-evgreen@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org We want to ensure that the key used to encrypt the digest was created by the kernel during hibernation. To do this we request that the TPM include information about the value of PCR 23 at the time of key creation in the sealed blob. On resume, we can make sure that the PCR information in the creation data blob (already certified by the TPM to be accurate) corresponds to the expected value. Since only the kernel can touch PCR 23, if an attacker generates a key themselves the value of PCR 23 will have been different, allowing us to reject the key and boot normally instead of resuming. Co-developed-by: Matthew Garrett Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett Signed-off-by: Evan Green --- Matthew's original version of this patch is here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/patch/20210220013255.1083202-9-matthewgarrett@google.com/ I moved the TPM2_CC_CERTIFYCREATION code into a separate change in the trusted key code because the blob_handle was being flushed and was no longer valid for use in CC_CERTIFYCREATION after the key was loaded. As an added benefit of moving the certification into the trusted keys code, we can drop the other patch from the original series that squirrelled the blob_handle away. Changes in v3: - Changed funky tag to Co-developed-by (Kees). Matthew, holler if you want something different. Changes in v2: - Fixed some sparse warnings - Use CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 to get rid of sha256_data() (Eric) - Adjusted offsets due to new ASN.1 format, and added a creation data length check. kernel/power/snapenc.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/power/snapenc.c b/kernel/power/snapenc.c index e0b902d2dcf13a..1f08942450775a 100644 --- a/kernel/power/snapenc.c +++ b/kernel/power/snapenc.c @@ -22,6 +22,12 @@ static struct tpm_digest known_digest = { .alg_id = TPM_ALG_SHA256, 0xf1, 0x22, 0x38, 0x6c, 0x33, 0xb1, 0x14, 0xb7, 0xec, 0x05, 0x5f, 0x49}}; +/* sha256(sha256(empty_pcr | known_digest)) */ +static const char expected_digest[] = {0x2f, 0x96, 0xf2, 0x1b, 0x70, 0xa9, 0xe8, + 0x42, 0x25, 0x8e, 0x66, 0x07, 0xbe, 0xbc, 0xe3, 0x1f, 0x2c, 0x84, 0x4a, + 0x3f, 0x85, 0x17, 0x31, 0x47, 0x9a, 0xa5, 0x53, 0xbb, 0x23, 0x0c, 0x32, + 0xf3}; + /* Derive a key from the kernel and user keys for data encryption. */ static int snapshot_use_user_key(struct snapshot_data *data) { @@ -486,7 +492,7 @@ static int snapshot_create_kernel_key(struct snapshot_data *data) struct key *key = NULL; int ret, i; /* Create a key sealed by the SRK. */ - char *keyinfo = "new\t32\tkeyhandle=0x81000000"; + char *keyinfo = "new\t32\tkeyhandle=0x81000000\tcreationpcrs=0x00800000"; chip = tpm_default_chip(); if (!chip) @@ -605,6 +611,7 @@ static int snapshot_load_kernel_key(struct snapshot_data *data, struct uswsusp_key_blob *blob) { + char certhash[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE]; const struct cred *cred = current_cred(); char *keytemplate = "load\t%s\tkeyhandle=0x81000000"; struct tpm_digest *digests = NULL; @@ -612,6 +619,7 @@ static int snapshot_load_kernel_key(struct snapshot_data *data, char *keyinfo = NULL; struct tpm_chip *chip; struct key *key = NULL; + struct trusted_key_payload *payload; int i, ret; chip = tpm_default_chip(); @@ -629,8 +637,10 @@ static int snapshot_load_kernel_key(struct snapshot_data *data, digests = kcalloc(chip->nr_allocated_banks, sizeof(struct tpm_digest), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!digests) + if (!digests) { + ret = -ENOMEM; goto out; + } for (i = 0; i <= chip->nr_allocated_banks; i++) { digests[i].alg_id = chip->allocated_banks[i].alg_id; @@ -670,6 +680,59 @@ static int snapshot_load_kernel_key(struct snapshot_data *data, if (ret != 0) goto out; + /* Verify the creation hash matches the creation data. */ + payload = key->payload.data[0]; + if (!payload->creation || !payload->creation_hash || + (payload->creation_len < 3) || + (payload->creation_hash_len < SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE)) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + + sha256(payload->creation + 2, payload->creation_len - 2, certhash); + if (memcmp(payload->creation_hash + 2, certhash, SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE) != 0) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + + /* We now know that the creation data is authentic - parse it */ + + /* TPML_PCR_SELECTION.count */ + if (be32_to_cpu(*(__be32 *)&payload->creation[2]) != 1) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + + if (be16_to_cpu(*(__be16 *)&payload->creation[6]) != TPM_ALG_SHA256) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + + if (*(char *)&payload->creation[8] != 3) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + + /* PCR 23 selected */ + if (be32_to_cpu(*(__be32 *)&payload->creation[8]) != 0x03000080) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + + if (be16_to_cpu(*(__be16 *)&payload->creation[12]) != + SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + + /* Verify PCR 23 contained the expected value when the key was created. */ + if (memcmp(&payload->creation[14], expected_digest, + SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE) != 0) { + + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + data->key = key; key = NULL;