From patchwork Fri Apr 15 05:59:11 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?b?UmV4LUJDIENoZW4gKOmZs+afj+i+sCk=?= X-Patchwork-Id: 562121 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0784C433F5 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 05:59:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350332AbiDOGCO (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2022 02:02:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49028 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1350245AbiDOGCB (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2022 02:02:01 -0400 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com (unknown [60.244.123.138]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7092CDF84; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 22:59:33 -0700 (PDT) X-UUID: eb914e28235f4adbb5a03a3a90c346b4-20220415 X-CID-P-RULE: Release_Ham X-CID-O-INFO: VERSION:1.1.4, REQID:e9653cc0-ba4b-4caa-8bcb-304770843bd2, OB:0, LO B:70,IP:0,URL:0,TC:0,Content:0,EDM:0,RT:0,SF:100,FILE:0,RULE:Release_Ham,A CTION:release,TS:100 X-CID-INFO: VERSION:1.1.4, REQID:e9653cc0-ba4b-4caa-8bcb-304770843bd2, OB:0, LOB: 70,IP:0,URL:0,TC:0,Content:0,EDM:0,RT:0,SF:100,FILE:0,RULE:Spam_GS981B3D,A CTION:quarantine,TS:100 X-CID-META: VersionHash:faefae9, CLOUDID:2b143aa9-d103-4e36-82b9-b0e86991b3df, C OID:FAIL,Recheck:0,SF:13|15|28|17|19|48,TC:nil,Content:0,EDM:-3,File:nil,Q S:0,BEC:nil X-UUID: eb914e28235f4adbb5a03a3a90c346b4-20220415 Received: from mtkcas10.mediatek.inc [(172.21.101.39)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (Generic MTA with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 1787711330; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:59:21 +0800 Received: from mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.40) by mtkmbs07n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:59:19 +0800 Received: from mtksdccf07.mediatek.inc (172.21.84.99) by mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:59:19 +0800 From: Rex-BC Chen To: , , , , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , Rex-BC Chen Subject: [PATCH V3 10/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Add counter to prevent infinite loop when tracking voltage Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:59:11 +0800 Message-ID: <20220415055916.28350-11-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0 In-Reply-To: <20220415055916.28350-1-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com> References: <20220415055916.28350-1-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To prevent infinite loop when tracking voltage, we calculate the maximum value for each platform data. We assume min voltage is 0 and tracking target voltage using min_volt_shift for each iteration. The retry_max is 3 times of expeted iteration count. Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen --- drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c index cc44a7a9427a..d4c00237e862 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c @@ -86,6 +86,16 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, struct regulator *proc_reg = info->proc_reg; struct regulator *sram_reg = info->sram_reg; int pre_vproc, pre_vsram, new_vsram, vsram, vproc, ret; + int retry_max; + + /* + * We assume min voltage is 0 and tracking target voltage using + * min_volt_shift for each iteration. + * The retry_max is 3 times of expeted iteration count. + */ + retry_max = 3 * DIV_ROUND_UP(max(info->soc_data->sram_max_volt, + info->soc_data->proc_max_volt), + info->soc_data->min_volt_shift); pre_vproc = regulator_get_voltage(proc_reg); if (pre_vproc < 0) { @@ -151,6 +161,12 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, pre_vproc = vproc; pre_vsram = vsram; + + if (--retry_max < 0) { + dev_err(info->cpu_dev, + "over loop count, failed to set voltage\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } } while (vproc != new_vproc || vsram != new_vsram); return 0;