diff mbox series

[v4,20/20] extcon: intel-cht-wc: Report RID_A for ACA adapters

Message ID 20220130204557.15662-21-hdegoede@redhat.com
State Accepted
Commit 21356ac14e054ee86a34008e2c59bd3f1b42d7bf
Headers show
Series power-suppy/i2c/extcon: Fix charger setup on Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 and Lenovo Yogabook | expand

Commit Message

Hans de Goede Jan. 30, 2022, 8:45 p.m. UTC 
Make cht_wc_extcon_get_id() report RID_A for ACA adapters, instead of
reporting ID_FLOAT.

According to the spec. we should read the USB-ID pin ADC value
to determine the resistance of the used pull-down resister and
then return RID_A / RID_B / RID_C based on this. But all "Accessory
Charger Adapter"s (ACAs) which users can actually buy always use
a combination of a charging port with one or more USB-A ports, so
they should always use a resistor indicating RID_A. But the spec
is hard to read / badly-worded so some of them actually indicate
they are a RID_B ACA even though they clearly are a RID_A ACA.

To workaround this simply always return INTEL_USB_RID_A, which
matches all the ACAs which users can actually buy.

Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/extcon/extcon-intel-cht-wc.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-intel-cht-wc.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-intel-cht-wc.c
index 144cb5d8cd47..2a8d41cbf41c 100644
--- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-intel-cht-wc.c
+++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-intel-cht-wc.c
@@ -121,13 +121,21 @@  static int cht_wc_extcon_get_id(struct cht_wc_extcon_data *ext, int pwrsrc_sts)
 		return INTEL_USB_ID_GND;
 	case CHT_WC_PWRSRC_RID_FLOAT:
 		return INTEL_USB_ID_FLOAT;
+	/*
+	 * According to the spec. we should read the USB-ID pin ADC value here
+	 * to determine the resistance of the used pull-down resister and then
+	 * return RID_A / RID_B / RID_C based on this. But all "Accessory
+	 * Charger Adapter"s (ACAs) which users can actually buy always use
+	 * a combination of a charging port with one or more USB-A ports, so
+	 * they should always use a resistor indicating RID_A. But the spec
+	 * is hard to read / badly-worded so some of them actually indicate
+	 * they are a RID_B ACA evnen though they clearly are a RID_A ACA.
+	 * To workaround this simply always return INTEL_USB_RID_A, which
+	 * matches all the ACAs which users can actually buy.
+	 */
 	case CHT_WC_PWRSRC_RID_ACA:
+		return INTEL_USB_RID_A;
 	default:
-		/*
-		 * Once we have IIO support for the GPADC we should read
-		 * the USBID GPADC channel here and determine ACA role
-		 * based on that.
-		 */
 		return INTEL_USB_ID_FLOAT;
 	}
 }