@@ -79,16 +79,12 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_get_dev_status(struct device *dev,
/*
* EMC_COUNT returns number of memory events, that number is lower
- * than the number of clocks. Conversion ratio of 1/8 results in a
- * bit higher bandwidth than actually needed, it is good enough for
- * the time being because drivers don't support requesting minimum
- * needed memory bandwidth yet.
- *
- * TODO: adjust the ratio value once relevant drivers will support
- * memory bandwidth management.
+ * than the number of total EMC clocks over the sampling period.
+ * The clocks number is converted to maximum possible number of
+ * memory events using the ratio of 1/4.
*/
stat->busy_time = readl_relaxed(tegra->regs + MC_STAT_EMC_COUNT);
- stat->total_time = readl_relaxed(tegra->regs + MC_STAT_EMC_CLOCKS) / 8;
+ stat->total_time = readl_relaxed(tegra->regs + MC_STAT_EMC_CLOCKS) / 4;
stat->current_frequency = clk_get_rate(tegra->emc_clock);
writel_relaxed(EMC_GATHER_CLEAR, tegra->regs + MC_STAT_CONTROL);
@@ -98,7 +94,7 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_get_dev_status(struct device *dev,
}
static struct devfreq_dev_profile tegra_devfreq_profile = {
- .polling_ms = 500,
+ .polling_ms = 30,
.target = tegra_devfreq_target,
.get_dev_status = tegra_devfreq_get_dev_status,
};
The current conversion ratio results in a higher frequency than needed, that is not very actual now since the Display Controller driver got support for memory bandwidth management and hence memory frequency can go lower now without bad consequences. Since memory freq now goes to a lower rates, the responsiveness of interactive applications become worse due to a quite high polling interval value that is currently set to 500ms. Changing polling interval to 30ms results in a good responsiveness of the system. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> --- drivers/devfreq/tegra20-devfreq.c | 14 +++++--------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)