mbox series

[0/3] x86: Don't support kernel-mode FPU with hardirqs disabled

Message ID 20250516231858.27899-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Headers show
Series x86: Don't support kernel-mode FPU with hardirqs disabled | expand

Message

Eric Biggers May 16, 2025, 11:18 p.m. UTC 
This series returns to my earlier suggestion to make x86 not support
kernel-mode FPU when hardirqs are disabled, aligning it with arm64
(https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250220051325.340691-2-ebiggers@kernel.org).
To make this possible despite the use of the kernel-mode FPU functions
by __save_processor_state() (which I mentioned at
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250228035924.GC5588@sol.localdomain), I've
changed __save_processor_state() to use a new function instead of
(mis)using the kernel-mode FPU functions.

This slightly reduces the overhead of kernel-mode FPU (since the result
is fewer checks), and it fixes the issue reported at
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250516112217.GBaCcf6Yoc6LkIIryP@fat_crate.local/
where irq_fpu_usable() incorrectly returned false during CPU
initialization, causing a crash in the SHA-256 library code.

Eric Biggers (3):
  x86/fpu: Add fpu_save_state() for __save_processor_state()
  x86/pm: Use fpu_save_state() in __save_processor_state()
  x86/fpu: Don't support kernel-mode FPU when irqs_disabled()

 arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h |  1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c     | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 arch/x86/power/cpu.c           | 18 +++----
 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)


base-commit: 8566fc3b96539e3235909d6bdda198e1282beaed