Message ID | 20230619190503.4061-1-wyes.karny@amd.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | cpupower: Add various feature control support for amd_pstate | expand |
Hi, sorry for the late answer, I wanted to give this a test, but could not make it (yet). My 2 cents on this one: what Ray already mentioned is greatly appreciated: Find common APIs, not only AMD vs Intel, but general ones, outside of the driver specific sysfs dir, e.g.: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/... But not at all costs and if the epp part is (AMD) specific and varies to others in meaning or in values, it has to be a specific file/API. (Another Example/Request at the end) And...: It would be nice to see some documentation in form of manpage enhancements. At least for the newly introduced arguments. If not yet, there should be: possible value range, which machines (CPU flags, Zen 4, ...), if more complex technology, some kind of introduction or reference where to find things would be really great. I wonder whether it could be possible to connect this with: Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_pstate.rst Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst I guess there is a static web site address people could rely on where above kernel docs are hosted forever? Then it would make sense to link the cpupower manpage with it and keep the description short and avoid duplication? Thomas Another Example/Request at the end: One example I recently got asked for, the bug is private: "cpupower is not returning max turbo active cores information on latest Intel processors." Here are examples of 2 newer cpus that don't return the active core information like this: 3600 MHz max turbo 4 active cores 3600 MHz max turbo 3 active cores 3700 MHz max turbo 2 active cores 3800 MHz max turbo 1 active cores Not sure whether there finally is some kind of consolidation on turbo/boost/ dynamic/hw/bios interfaces in respect to turbo/boosting technology. But if anyhow possible and it makes sense, it would be really great to see one sysfs file exposed to userspace to read/enable/disable. Possible cpufreqs (including or only) boost freqs, maybe with active cores if this is a general technique optionally added if avail? Nothing which has to be implemented at all costs and right now, just an idea on how things could be consolidated at some point of time which might be wise to think about now already...
On 7/14/23 05:19, Thomas Renninger wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for the late answer, I wanted to give this a test, but could not > make it (yet). > > My 2 cents on this one: > > what Ray already mentioned is greatly appreciated: Find common APIs, not only > AMD vs Intel, but general ones, outside of the driver specific sysfs dir, e.g.: > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/... > > But not at all costs and if the epp part is (AMD) specific and varies to others > in meaning or in values, it has to be a specific file/API. > > (Another Example/Request at the end) > > And...: It would be nice to see some documentation in form of manpage > enhancements. At least for the newly introduced arguments. > If not yet, there should be: possible value range, which machines (CPU flags, > Zen 4, ...), if more complex technology, some kind of introduction or > reference where to find things would be really great. > > I wonder whether it could be possible to connect this with: > Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_pstate.rst > Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst > > I guess there is a static web site address people could rely on where above > kernel docs are hosted forever? > Then it would make sense to link the cpupower manpage with it and keep the > description short and avoid duplication? > > Thomas > > > Another Example/Request at the end: > > One example I recently got asked for, the bug is private: > "cpupower is not returning max turbo active cores information on latest Intel > processors." > > Here are examples of 2 newer cpus that don't return the active core > information like this: > 3600 MHz max turbo 4 active cores > 3600 MHz max turbo 3 active cores > 3700 MHz max turbo 2 active cores > 3800 MHz max turbo 1 active cores > > Not sure whether there finally is some kind of consolidation on turbo/boost/ > dynamic/hw/bios interfaces in respect to turbo/boosting technology. But if > anyhow possible and it makes sense, it would be really great to see one sysfs > file exposed to userspace to read/enable/disable. > > Possible cpufreqs (including or only) boost freqs, maybe with active cores if > this is a general technique optionally added if avail? > > Nothing which has to be implemented at all costs and right now, just an idea > on how things could be consolidated at some point of time which might be wise > to think about now already... > I applied these for Linux 6.6-rc1 - ran quick tests. Please act on feedback from Thomas and send me patches on top of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux.git/log/?h=cpupower thanks, -- Shuah