Message ID | 20210614185815.15136-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add allowed CPU capacity knowledge to EAS | expand |
Hi Peter, On 6/14/21 7:58 PM, Lukasz Luba wrote: > Hi all, > > The patch set v4 aims to add knowledge about reduced CPU capacity > into the Energy Model (EM) and Energy Aware Scheduler (EAS). Currently the > issue is that SchedUtil CPU frequency and EM frequency are not aligned, > when there is a CPU thermal capping. This causes an estimation error. > This patch set provides the information about allowed CPU capacity > into the EM (thanks to thermal pressure information). This improves the > energy estimation. More info about this mechanism can be found in the > patches description. > > Changelog: > v4: > - removed local variable and improved description in patch 2/3 > - added Reviewed-by from Vincent for patch 2/3 > - added Acked-by from Viresh for patch 1/3 > v3 [3]: > - switched to 'raw' per-cpu thermal pressure instead of thermal pressure > geometric series signal, since it more suited for purpose of > this use case: predicting SchedUtil frequency (Vincent, Dietmar) > - added more comment in the patch 2/3 header for use case when thermal > capping might be applied even the CPUs are not over-utilized > (Dietmar) > - added ACK tag from Rafael for SchedUtil part > - added a fix patch for offline CPUs in cpufreq_cooling and per-cpu > thermal_pressure missing update > v2 [2]: > - clamp the returned value from effective_cpu_util() and avoid irq > util scaling issues (Quentin) > v1 is available at [1] > > Regards, > Lukasz > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20210602135609.10867-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210604080954.13915-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com/ > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210610150324.22919-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com/ > > Lukasz Luba (3): > thermal: cpufreq_cooling: Update also offline CPUs per-cpu > thermal_pressure > sched/fair: Take thermal pressure into account while estimating energy > sched/cpufreq: Consider reduced CPU capacity in energy calculation > > drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c | 2 +- > include/linux/energy_model.h | 16 +++++++++++++--- > include/linux/sched/cpufreq.h | 2 +- > kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 1 + > kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 +++++++++---- > 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > Could you take these 3 patches via your tree, please? I'm asking you because the fair.c has most changes (apart from energy_model.h) and the patches got ACKs from Rafael and Viresh. The patch which touches fair.c got Reviewed-by Vincent Guittot. I have address all the comment, thus, IMHO it could fly now. Please let me know if you like me to re-base on top of some of your branches. Regards, Lukasz