| Message ID | 20241010122957.85164-1-andreas@kemnade.info |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | ARM: dts: omap: omap4-epson-embt2ws: misc gpio definitions | expand |
Am Thu, 10 Oct 2024 09:30:09 -0500 schrieb "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>: > On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:29:53 +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > Bring the system into a more defined state and do not rely > > on things being initialized by bootloader. > > > > Changes in V2: > > - better comment strange GPIOs > > - proper names for regulator nodes > > > > Andreas Kemnade (4): > > ARM: dts: omap: omap4-epson-embt2ws: define GPIO regulators > > ARM: dts: omap: omap4-epson-embt2ws: wire up regulators > > ARM: dts: omap: omap4-epson-embt2ws: add unknown gpio outputs > > ARM: dts: omap: omap4-epson-embt2ws: add GPIO expander > > > > .../boot/dts/ti/omap/omap4-epson-embt2ws.dts | 183 > > +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 179 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.39.5 > > > > > > > > > My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in > this series. > > Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the > warnings are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the > platform maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No > need to reply unless the platform maintainer has comments. > > If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then > make sure dt-schema is up to date: > > pip3 install dtschema --upgrade > > > New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y > ti/omap/omap4-epson-embt2ws.dtb' for > 20241010122957.85164-1-andreas@kemnade.info: > > arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/omap4-epson-embt2ws.dtb: serial@0: > {'compatible': ['ti,omap4-uart'], 'reg': [[0, 256]], 'interrupts': > [[0, 74, 4]], 'clock-frequency': 48000000, 'pinctrl-names': > ['default'], 'pinctrl-0': [[115]], 'interrupts-extended': [[1, 0, 74, > 4], [116, 260]], '$nodename': ['serial@0']} is valid under each of > {'required': ['interrupts-extended']}, {'required': ['interrupts']} > from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/8250_omap.yaml# > arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/omap4-epson-embt2ws.dtb: serial@0: > {'compatible': ['ti,omap4-uart'], 'reg': [[0, 256]], 'interrupts': > [[0, 73, 4]], 'clock-frequency': 48000000, 'pinctrl-names': > ['default'], 'pinctrl-0': [[118, 119]], 'interrupts-extended': [[1, > 0, 73, 4], [116, 220]], 'bluetooth-gnss': {'compatible': > ['ti,wl1283-st'], 'enable-gpios': [[120, 25, 0]], 'clocks': [[121, > 1]], 'clock-names': ['ext_clock']}, '$nodename': ['serial@0']} is > valid under each of {'required': ['interrupts-extended']}, > {'required': ['interrupts']} from schema $id: > http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/8250_omap.yaml# > To make sure I am getting this right: According to wdiff, the difference is: 'pinctrl-0': [-[[116, 117]],-] {+[[118, 119]],+} 'interrupts-extended': [[1, 0, 73, 4], [-[114,-] {+[116,+} 220]] So my understanding is that phandle numbers are reordered and one of the reordered numbers pops up in a warning message and cannot easily be filtered away. Are there any tools or procedures in general to filter out phandle reenumeration noise? Also when reordering things expecting no functional change and diffing dtbs that would be helpful. Regards, Andreas
"Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org> writes: > On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:29:53 +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote: >> Bring the system into a more defined state and do not rely >> on things being initialized by bootloader. >> >> Changes in V2: >> - better comment strange GPIOs >> - proper names for regulator nodes >> >> Andreas Kemnade (4): >> ARM: dts: omap: omap4-epson-embt2ws: define GPIO regulators >> ARM: dts: omap: omap4-epson-embt2ws: wire up regulators >> ARM: dts: omap: omap4-epson-embt2ws: add unknown gpio outputs >> ARM: dts: omap: omap4-epson-embt2ws: add GPIO expander >> >> .../boot/dts/ti/omap/omap4-epson-embt2ws.dts | 183 +++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 179 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.39.5 >> >> >> > > > My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this > series. > > Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings > are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform > maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply > unless the platform maintainer has comments. This seems like not a new warning, but instead a reoccurance of an existing warning due to a phandle rename, so I'm planning to pull this as is. Kevin
On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:29:53 +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > Bring the system into a more defined state and do not rely > on things being initialized by bootloader. > > Changes in V2: > - better comment strange GPIOs > - proper names for regulator nodes > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/4] ARM: dts: omap: omap4-epson-embt2ws: define GPIO regulators commit: c14655b6dffd9ca93276f630d2c9a5973711d33b [2/4] ARM: dts: omap: omap4-epson-embt2ws: wire up regulators commit: e84bc0f34f708f3c58e5268cb53f451af97fe1d3 [3/4] ARM: dts: omap: omap4-epson-embt2ws: add unknown gpio outputs commit: b5a041ea0bfb2eb8ab5e19f61e2772faa8110a2d [4/4] ARM: dts: omap: omap4-epson-embt2ws: add GPIO expander commit: 0b96b3f1d01486e836d01d18c2f8e3f01b046cb5 Best regards,