Message ID | 20230208173343.37582-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | gpiolib cleanups | expand |
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 6:34 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > These are some older patches Arnd did last year, rebased to > linux-next-20230208. On top there are Andy's patches regarding > similar topic. The series starts with Linus Walleij's patches. > > The main goal is to remove some of the legacy bits of the gpiolib > interfaces, where the corner cases are easily avoided or replaced > with gpio descriptor based interfaces. > > The idea is to get an immutable branch and route the whole series > via GPIO tree. > Andy, looks like this series has all the acks it needs but I decided to not send it in the upcoming merge window, I'd prefer it gets some time in next so I'll let it sit until the next release cycle. Bart
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 04:52:29PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 6:34 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > These are some older patches Arnd did last year, rebased to > > linux-next-20230208. On top there are Andy's patches regarding > > similar topic. The series starts with Linus Walleij's patches. > > > > The main goal is to remove some of the legacy bits of the gpiolib > > interfaces, where the corner cases are easily avoided or replaced > > with gpio descriptor based interfaces. > > > > The idea is to get an immutable branch and route the whole series > > via GPIO tree. > > Andy, > > looks like this series has all the acks it needs but I decided to not > send it in the upcoming merge window, I'd prefer it gets some time in > next so I'll let it sit until the next release cycle. Ah, I forgot to mention that this is for the next cycle (v6.4). Hence it's fine. (Moreover it's based on Linux Next, so it will fail compilation in any certain tree except that one.) I will create an immutable branch after v6.3-rc1 is out.