Message ID | 1485357143-23280-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | mmc: core: Enable mmc hosts to specify support for eMMC DDR 3.3V | expand |
On 2017/1/25 23:12, Ulf Hansson wrote: > It's been reported that some mmc hosts don't support a VCCQ (signal voltage) of > 1.8V for eMMC DDR mode, but instead only 3.3V. According to the JEDEC spec, an > eMMC card must support both if any, which makes the mmc host being the > potential limitation. Therefore, let's invent a new mmc cap, MMC_CAP_3_3V_DDR, > and a new corresponding DT binding, which tells whether 3.3V is supported for > the VCCQ. > > In the context of these changes, I took the opportunity to make some clean-ups > of some related code. > This patchset looks good. Just a nit, maybe we could take this chance to improve the patch 3 as we touch it now:) s/mmc_set_signal_voltage(host, MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180) == 0/ !mmc_set_signal_voltage(host, MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180), and so on:) Anyway, Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> > Ulf Hansson (6): > mmc: core: Remove redundant code in mmc_set_signal_voltage() > mmc: core: Clarify usage of mmc_set_signal_voltage() > mmc: core: Rename __mmc_set_signal_voltage() to > mmc_set_signal_voltage() > mmc: core: Invent MMC_CAP_3_3V_DDR > mmc: dt: Document binding for eMMC DDR 3.3V I/O voltage support > mmc: core: Extend mmc_of_parse() to check for mmc-ddr-3_3v > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt | 1 + > drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 19 ++++++------------- > drivers/mmc/core/core.h | 4 ++-- > drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 2 ++ > drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------ > drivers/mmc/core/sd.c | 3 +-- > drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c | 3 +-- > include/linux/mmc/host.h | 21 ++++++++++----------- > 8 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > -- Best Regards Shawn Lin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 27 January 2017 at 03:27, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: > On 2017/1/25 23:12, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> >> It's been reported that some mmc hosts don't support a VCCQ (signal >> voltage) of >> 1.8V for eMMC DDR mode, but instead only 3.3V. According to the JEDEC >> spec, an >> eMMC card must support both if any, which makes the mmc host being the >> potential limitation. Therefore, let's invent a new mmc cap, >> MMC_CAP_3_3V_DDR, >> and a new corresponding DT binding, which tells whether 3.3V is supported >> for >> the VCCQ. >> >> In the context of these changes, I took the opportunity to make some >> clean-ups >> of some related code. >> > > This patchset looks good. Just a nit, maybe we could take this chance > to improve the patch 3 as we touch it now:) > > s/mmc_set_signal_voltage(host, MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180) == 0/ > !mmc_set_signal_voltage(host, MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180), and so on:) Good idea! I found three places in mmc_power_up() which I fixed up. I postpone to send a new version, to wait for further comments. If none, I will just amend the change in patch3/6. > > Anyway, > Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> Thanks for reviewing! [...] Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 04:12:17PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > It's been reported that some mmc hosts don't support a VCCQ (signal voltage) of > 1.8V for eMMC DDR mode, but instead only 3.3V. According to the JEDEC spec, an > eMMC card must support both if any, which makes the mmc host being the > potential limitation. Therefore, let's invent a new mmc cap, MMC_CAP_3_3V_DDR, > and a new corresponding DT binding, which tells whether 3.3V is supported for > the VCCQ. > > In the context of these changes, I took the opportunity to make some clean-ups > of some related code. Works fine with the new Cavium driver (enables DDR mode for the eMMC). Tested-by: Jan Glauber <jglauber@cavium.com> > Ulf Hansson (6): > mmc: core: Remove redundant code in mmc_set_signal_voltage() > mmc: core: Clarify usage of mmc_set_signal_voltage() > mmc: core: Rename __mmc_set_signal_voltage() to > mmc_set_signal_voltage() > mmc: core: Invent MMC_CAP_3_3V_DDR > mmc: dt: Document binding for eMMC DDR 3.3V I/O voltage support > mmc: core: Extend mmc_of_parse() to check for mmc-ddr-3_3v > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt | 1 + > drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 19 ++++++------------- > drivers/mmc/core/core.h | 4 ++-- > drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 2 ++ > drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------ > drivers/mmc/core/sd.c | 3 +-- > drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c | 3 +-- > include/linux/mmc/host.h | 21 ++++++++++----------- > 8 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 25 January 2017 at 16:12, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote: > It's been reported that some mmc hosts don't support a VCCQ (signal voltage) of > 1.8V for eMMC DDR mode, but instead only 3.3V. According to the JEDEC spec, an > eMMC card must support both if any, which makes the mmc host being the > potential limitation. Therefore, let's invent a new mmc cap, MMC_CAP_3_3V_DDR, > and a new corresponding DT binding, which tells whether 3.3V is supported for > the VCCQ. > > In the context of these changes, I took the opportunity to make some clean-ups > of some related code. > > Ulf Hansson (6): > mmc: core: Remove redundant code in mmc_set_signal_voltage() > mmc: core: Clarify usage of mmc_set_signal_voltage() > mmc: core: Rename __mmc_set_signal_voltage() to > mmc_set_signal_voltage() > mmc: core: Invent MMC_CAP_3_3V_DDR > mmc: dt: Document binding for eMMC DDR 3.3V I/O voltage support > mmc: core: Extend mmc_of_parse() to check for mmc-ddr-3_3v > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt | 1 + > drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 19 ++++++------------- > drivers/mmc/core/core.h | 4 ++-- > drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 2 ++ > drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------ > drivers/mmc/core/sd.c | 3 +-- > drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c | 3 +-- > include/linux/mmc/host.h | 21 ++++++++++----------- > 8 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.9.1 > Applied for next, amended patch 3/6 according to suggestions by Shawn. Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Am 25.01.2017 um 16:12 schrieb Ulf Hansson: > It's been reported that some mmc hosts don't support a VCCQ (signal voltage) of > 1.8V for eMMC DDR mode, but instead only 3.3V. According to the JEDEC spec, an > eMMC card must support both if any, which makes the mmc host being the > potential limitation. Therefore, let's invent a new mmc cap, MMC_CAP_3_3V_DDR, > and a new corresponding DT binding, which tells whether 3.3V is supported for > the VCCQ. > > In the context of these changes, I took the opportunity to make some clean-ups > of some related code. I know this series has already been merged, but i want to mention that it works fine with mxs-mmc on a i.MX28. Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 30 January 2017 at 10:13, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> wrote: > Am 25.01.2017 um 16:12 schrieb Ulf Hansson: >> It's been reported that some mmc hosts don't support a VCCQ (signal voltage) of >> 1.8V for eMMC DDR mode, but instead only 3.3V. According to the JEDEC spec, an >> eMMC card must support both if any, which makes the mmc host being the >> potential limitation. Therefore, let's invent a new mmc cap, MMC_CAP_3_3V_DDR, >> and a new corresponding DT binding, which tells whether 3.3V is supported for >> the VCCQ. >> >> In the context of these changes, I took the opportunity to make some clean-ups >> of some related code. > > I know this series has already been merged, but i want to mention that > it works fine with mxs-mmc on a i.MX28. Thanks! I have added your tested by tag. Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html