[v2,1/8] media: allegro: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named
'timeout' to store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing
patterns like:

        timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
        if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the
code self explaining, also for the code path using 'tmo' as a variable.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---

Change since v1:
* fixed the 'tmo' variable as well

 .../media/platform/allegro-dvt/allegro-core.c | 24 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

On Mon, 05 Aug 2024 23:51:14 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named
> 'timeout' to store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing
> patterns like:
> 
>         timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
>         if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
> 
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the
> code self explaining, also for the code path using 'tmo' as a variable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Reviewed-by: Michael Tretter <m.tretter@pengutronix.de>

> ---
> 
> Change since v1:
> * fixed the 'tmo' variable as well
> 
>  .../media/platform/allegro-dvt/allegro-core.c | 24 +++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/allegro-dvt/allegro-core.c b/drivers/media/platform/allegro-dvt/allegro-core.c
> index da61f9beb6b4..0142ba175198 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/allegro-dvt/allegro-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/allegro-dvt/allegro-core.c
> @@ -1415,11 +1415,11 @@ static int allegro_mcu_send_encode_frame(struct allegro_dev *dev,
>  static int allegro_mcu_wait_for_init_timeout(struct allegro_dev *dev,
>  					     unsigned long timeout_ms)
>  {
> -	unsigned long tmo;
> +	unsigned long time_left;
>  
> -	tmo = wait_for_completion_timeout(&dev->init_complete,
> -					  msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms));
> -	if (tmo == 0)
> +	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&dev->init_complete,
> +						msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms));
> +	if (time_left == 0)
>  		return -ETIMEDOUT;
>  
>  	reinit_completion(&dev->init_complete);
> @@ -2481,14 +2481,14 @@ static void allegro_mcu_interrupt(struct allegro_dev *dev)
>  static void allegro_destroy_channel(struct allegro_channel *channel)
>  {
>  	struct allegro_dev *dev = channel->dev;
> -	unsigned long timeout;
> +	unsigned long time_left;
>  
>  	if (channel_exists(channel)) {
>  		reinit_completion(&channel->completion);
>  		allegro_mcu_send_destroy_channel(dev, channel);
> -		timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&channel->completion,
> -						      msecs_to_jiffies(5000));
> -		if (timeout == 0)
> +		time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&channel->completion,
> +							msecs_to_jiffies(5000));
> +		if (time_left == 0)
>  			v4l2_warn(&dev->v4l2_dev,
>  				  "channel %d: timeout while destroying\n",
>  				  channel->mcu_channel_id);
> @@ -2544,7 +2544,7 @@ static void allegro_destroy_channel(struct allegro_channel *channel)
>  static int allegro_create_channel(struct allegro_channel *channel)
>  {
>  	struct allegro_dev *dev = channel->dev;
> -	unsigned long timeout;
> +	unsigned long time_left;
>  
>  	if (channel_exists(channel)) {
>  		v4l2_warn(&dev->v4l2_dev,
> @@ -2595,9 +2595,9 @@ static int allegro_create_channel(struct allegro_channel *channel)
>  
>  	reinit_completion(&channel->completion);
>  	allegro_mcu_send_create_channel(dev, channel);
> -	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&channel->completion,
> -					      msecs_to_jiffies(5000));
> -	if (timeout == 0)
> +	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&channel->completion,
> +						msecs_to_jiffies(5000));
> +	if (time_left == 0)
>  		channel->error = -ETIMEDOUT;
>  	if (channel->error)
>  		goto err;
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
>