Message ID | 20210202135611.13920-14-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | None | expand |
On 2/2/21 11:25 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com> > > Now that most users of v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev have been converted, > let's fix the documentation so it's more clear how the v4l2-async API > should be used. > > Document functions that drivers should use, and their purpose. > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com> > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com> Thanks for working on this :) Regards, Helen > --- > since v5: > > - Fix function names after which notifier needs to be cleaned up or > initialised before; v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev -> > __v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev. > > .../driver-api/media/v4l2-subdev.rst | 48 +++++++++++++++---- > include/media/v4l2-async.h | 15 ++++-- > 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-subdev.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-subdev.rst > index 0e82c77cf3e2..8b53da2f9c74 100644 > --- a/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-subdev.rst > +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-subdev.rst > @@ -197,15 +197,45 @@ unregister the notifier the driver has to call > takes two arguments: a pointer to struct :c:type:`v4l2_device` and a > pointer to struct :c:type:`v4l2_async_notifier`. > > -Before registering the notifier, bridge drivers must do two things: > -first, the notifier must be initialized using the > -:c:func:`v4l2_async_notifier_init`. Second, bridge drivers can then > -begin to form a list of subdevice descriptors that the bridge device > -needs for its operation. Subdevice descriptors are added to the notifier > -using the :c:func:`v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev` call. This function > -takes two arguments: a pointer to struct :c:type:`v4l2_async_notifier`, > -and a pointer to the subdevice descripter, which is of type struct > -:c:type:`v4l2_async_subdev`. > +Before registering the notifier, bridge drivers must do two things: first, the > +notifier must be initialized using the :c:func:`v4l2_async_notifier_init`. > +Second, bridge drivers can then begin to form a list of subdevice descriptors > +that the bridge device needs for its operation. Several functions are available > +to add subdevice descriptors to a notifier, depending on the type of device and > +the needs of the driver. > + > +:c:func:`v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev` and > +:c:func:`v4l2_async_notifier_add_i2c_subdev` are for bridge and ISP drivers for > +registering their async sub-devices with the notifier. > + > +:c:func:`v4l2_async_register_subdev_sensor_common` is a helper function for > +sensor drivers registering their own async sub-device, but it also registers a > +notifier and further registers async sub-devices for lens and flash devices > +found in firmware. The notifier for the sub-device is unregistered with the > +async sub-device. > + > +These functions allocate an async sub-device descriptor which is of type struct > +:c:type:`v4l2_async_subdev` embedded in a driver-specific struct. The &struct > +:c:type:`v4l2_async_subdev` shall be the first member of this struct: > + > +.. code-block:: c > + > + struct my_async_subdev { > + struct v4l2_async_subdev asd; > + ... > + }; > + > + struct my_async_subdev *my_asd; > + struct fwnode_handle *ep; > + > + ... > + > + my_asd = v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev(¬ifier, ep, > + struct my_async_subdev); > + fwnode_handle_put(ep); > + > + if (IS_ERR(asd)) > + return PTR_ERR(asd); > > The V4L2 core will then use these descriptors to match asynchronously > registered subdevices to them. If a match is detected the ``.bound()`` > diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-async.h b/include/media/v4l2-async.h > index 192a11bdc4ad..6f22daa6f067 100644 > --- a/include/media/v4l2-async.h > +++ b/include/media/v4l2-async.h > @@ -128,7 +128,12 @@ void v4l2_async_debug_init(struct dentry *debugfs_dir); > * @notifier: pointer to &struct v4l2_async_notifier > * > * This function initializes the notifier @asd_list. It must be called > - * before the first call to @v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev. > + * before adding a subdevice to a notifier, using one of: > + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev, > + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_subdev, > + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_i2c_subdev, > + * @__v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev or > + * @v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints. > */ > void v4l2_async_notifier_init(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier); > > @@ -262,9 +267,11 @@ void v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier); > * sub-devices allocated for the purposes of the notifier but not the notifier > * itself. The user is responsible for calling this function to clean up the > * notifier after calling > - * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev, > - * @v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints or > - * @v4l2_fwnode_reference_parse_sensor_common. > + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev, > + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_subdev, > + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_i2c_subdev, > + * @__v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev or > + * @v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints. > * > * There is no harm from calling v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup in other > * cases as long as its memory has been zeroed after it has been >
On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 12:23:52PM -0300, Helen Koike wrote: > > > On 2/2/21 11:25 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com> > > > > Now that most users of v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev have been converted, > > let's fix the documentation so it's more clear how the v4l2-async API > > should be used. > > > > Document functions that drivers should use, and their purpose. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com> > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> > > Reviewed-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com> > > Thanks for working on this :) And thank you for the reviews! :-)
Em Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:56:11 +0200 Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> escreveu: > From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com> > > Now that most users of v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev have been converted, > let's fix the documentation so it's more clear how the v4l2-async API > should be used. > > Document functions that drivers should use, and their purpose. > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com> > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> > --- > .../driver-api/media/v4l2-subdev.rst | 48 +++++++++++++++---- > include/media/v4l2-async.h | 15 ++++-- > 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-subdev.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-subdev.rst > index 0e82c77cf3e2..8b53da2f9c74 100644 > --- a/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-subdev.rst > +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-subdev.rst > @@ -197,15 +197,45 @@ unregister the notifier the driver has to call > takes two arguments: a pointer to struct :c:type:`v4l2_device` and a > pointer to struct :c:type:`v4l2_async_notifier`. > > -Before registering the notifier, bridge drivers must do two things: > -first, the notifier must be initialized using the > -:c:func:`v4l2_async_notifier_init`. Second, bridge drivers can then > -begin to form a list of subdevice descriptors that the bridge device > -needs for its operation. Subdevice descriptors are added to the notifier > -using the :c:func:`v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev` call. This function > -takes two arguments: a pointer to struct :c:type:`v4l2_async_notifier`, > -and a pointer to the subdevice descripter, which is of type struct > -:c:type:`v4l2_async_subdev`. > +Before registering the notifier, bridge drivers must do two things: first, the > +notifier must be initialized using the :c:func:`v4l2_async_notifier_init`. > +Second, bridge drivers can then begin to form a list of subdevice descriptors > +that the bridge device needs for its operation. Several functions are available > +to add subdevice descriptors to a notifier, depending on the type of device and > +the needs of the driver. > + > +:c:func:`v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev` and > +:c:func:`v4l2_async_notifier_add_i2c_subdev` are for bridge and ISP drivers for > +registering their async sub-devices with the notifier. > + > +:c:func:`v4l2_async_register_subdev_sensor_common` is a helper function for > +sensor drivers registering their own async sub-device, but it also registers a > +notifier and further registers async sub-devices for lens and flash devices > +found in firmware. The notifier for the sub-device is unregistered with the > +async sub-device. > + > +These functions allocate an async sub-device descriptor which is of type struct > +:c:type:`v4l2_async_subdev` embedded in a driver-specific struct. The &struct > +:c:type:`v4l2_async_subdev` shall be the first member of this struct: There's absolutely no need anymore to use: struct :c:type:`v4l2_async_subdev` or :c:func:`v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev` In a matter of fact, this can even cause troubles with newer versions of Sphinx, as, after version 3.0, structs should be declared as: :c:struct:`foo` Our building system has gained a few years ago a Sphinx extension that will automatically use the right markup, if all structs are declared as: struct foo and all functions as: bar() So, the last two paragraphs could be simply: v4l2_async_register_subdev_sensor_common() is a helper function for sensor drivers registering their own async sub-device, but it also registers a notifier and further registers async sub-devices for lens and flash devices found in firmware. The notifier for the sub-device is unregistered with the async sub-device. These functions allocate an async sub-device descriptor which is of type struct v4l2_async_subdev embedded in a driver-specific struct. The struct v4l2_async_subdev shall be the first member of this struct: PS.: I guess the automarkup.py would accept having something like: very big line here with lots of words... struct foo IMHO, for people reading the text files, it is a lot easier to keep "struct foo" at the same line, like: very big line here with lots of words... struct foo > + > +.. code-block:: c > + > + struct my_async_subdev { > + struct v4l2_async_subdev asd; > + ... > + }; > + > + struct my_async_subdev *my_asd; > + struct fwnode_handle *ep; > + > + ... > + > + my_asd = v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev(¬ifier, ep, > + struct my_async_subdev); > + fwnode_handle_put(ep); > + > + if (IS_ERR(asd)) > + return PTR_ERR(asd); > > The V4L2 core will then use these descriptors to match asynchronously > registered subdevices to them. If a match is detected the ``.bound()`` > diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-async.h b/include/media/v4l2-async.h > index 192a11bdc4ad..6dac6cb6290f 100644 > --- a/include/media/v4l2-async.h > +++ b/include/media/v4l2-async.h > @@ -128,7 +128,12 @@ void v4l2_async_debug_init(struct dentry *debugfs_dir); > * @notifier: pointer to &struct v4l2_async_notifier > * > * This function initializes the notifier @asd_list. It must be called > - * before the first call to @v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev. > + * before adding a subdevice to a notifier, using one of: > + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev, > + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_subdev, > + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_i2c_subdev, > + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev or > + * @v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints. The markups here are wrong: '@foo' is to be used for literal blocks. It won't produce any cross-references. The right way to describe functions is to write it as: foo() > */ > void v4l2_async_notifier_init(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier); > > @@ -262,9 +267,11 @@ void v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier); > * sub-devices allocated for the purposes of the notifier but not the notifier > * itself. The user is responsible for calling this function to clean up the > * notifier after calling > - * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev, > - * @v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints or > - * @v4l2_fwnode_reference_parse_sensor_common. > + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev, > + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_subdev, > + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_i2c_subdev, > + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev or > + * @v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints. > * > * There is no harm from calling v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup in other > * cases as long as its memory has been zeroed after it has been Please send a followup patch. Thanks, Mauro
Hi Mauro,
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 09:29:54AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Please send a followup patch.
Sure.
--
Sakari Ailus
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-subdev.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-subdev.rst index 0e82c77cf3e2..8b53da2f9c74 100644 --- a/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-subdev.rst +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-subdev.rst @@ -197,15 +197,45 @@ unregister the notifier the driver has to call takes two arguments: a pointer to struct :c:type:`v4l2_device` and a pointer to struct :c:type:`v4l2_async_notifier`. -Before registering the notifier, bridge drivers must do two things: -first, the notifier must be initialized using the -:c:func:`v4l2_async_notifier_init`. Second, bridge drivers can then -begin to form a list of subdevice descriptors that the bridge device -needs for its operation. Subdevice descriptors are added to the notifier -using the :c:func:`v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev` call. This function -takes two arguments: a pointer to struct :c:type:`v4l2_async_notifier`, -and a pointer to the subdevice descripter, which is of type struct -:c:type:`v4l2_async_subdev`. +Before registering the notifier, bridge drivers must do two things: first, the +notifier must be initialized using the :c:func:`v4l2_async_notifier_init`. +Second, bridge drivers can then begin to form a list of subdevice descriptors +that the bridge device needs for its operation. Several functions are available +to add subdevice descriptors to a notifier, depending on the type of device and +the needs of the driver. + +:c:func:`v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev` and +:c:func:`v4l2_async_notifier_add_i2c_subdev` are for bridge and ISP drivers for +registering their async sub-devices with the notifier. + +:c:func:`v4l2_async_register_subdev_sensor_common` is a helper function for +sensor drivers registering their own async sub-device, but it also registers a +notifier and further registers async sub-devices for lens and flash devices +found in firmware. The notifier for the sub-device is unregistered with the +async sub-device. + +These functions allocate an async sub-device descriptor which is of type struct +:c:type:`v4l2_async_subdev` embedded in a driver-specific struct. The &struct +:c:type:`v4l2_async_subdev` shall be the first member of this struct: + +.. code-block:: c + + struct my_async_subdev { + struct v4l2_async_subdev asd; + ... + }; + + struct my_async_subdev *my_asd; + struct fwnode_handle *ep; + + ... + + my_asd = v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev(¬ifier, ep, + struct my_async_subdev); + fwnode_handle_put(ep); + + if (IS_ERR(asd)) + return PTR_ERR(asd); The V4L2 core will then use these descriptors to match asynchronously registered subdevices to them. If a match is detected the ``.bound()`` diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-async.h b/include/media/v4l2-async.h index 192a11bdc4ad..6dac6cb6290f 100644 --- a/include/media/v4l2-async.h +++ b/include/media/v4l2-async.h @@ -128,7 +128,12 @@ void v4l2_async_debug_init(struct dentry *debugfs_dir); * @notifier: pointer to &struct v4l2_async_notifier * * This function initializes the notifier @asd_list. It must be called - * before the first call to @v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev. + * before adding a subdevice to a notifier, using one of: + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev, + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_subdev, + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_i2c_subdev, + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev or + * @v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints. */ void v4l2_async_notifier_init(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier); @@ -262,9 +267,11 @@ void v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier); * sub-devices allocated for the purposes of the notifier but not the notifier * itself. The user is responsible for calling this function to clean up the * notifier after calling - * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev, - * @v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints or - * @v4l2_fwnode_reference_parse_sensor_common. + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev, + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_subdev, + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_i2c_subdev, + * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev or + * @v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints. * * There is no harm from calling v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup in other * cases as long as its memory has been zeroed after it has been