Message ID | cover.1618859059.git.drv@mailo.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | staging: media: atomisp: code cleanup fixes | expand |
Hi, On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:45:57AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote: > Mixed case variable names are discouraged and they result in checkpatch > script "Avoid CamelCase" warnings. Replace such CamelCase variable names > by lower case strings according to the coding style guidelines. > > Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com> > --- > .../media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-mt9m114.c | 62 +++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-mt9m114.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-mt9m114.c > index 160bb58ce708..e63906a69e30 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-mt9m114.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-mt9m114.c > @@ -999,10 +999,10 @@ static long mt9m114_s_exposure(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, > struct mt9m114_device *dev = to_mt9m114_sensor(sd); > int ret = 0; > unsigned int coarse_integration = 0; > - unsigned int FLines = 0; > - unsigned int FrameLengthLines = 0; /* ExposureTime.FrameLengthLines; */ > - unsigned int AnalogGain, DigitalGain; > - u32 AnalogGainToWrite = 0; > + unsigned int f_lines = 0; > + unsigned int frame_len_lines = 0; /* ExposureTime.FrameLengthLines; */ > + unsigned int analog_gain, digital_gain; > + u32 analog_gain_to_write = 0; > this patch is made of multiple logical changes, i.e. more than one variable at a time are renamed. Maybe this should be split in one patch per variable name. thank you, fabio
On 19/04/2021 21:12, Deepak R Varma wrote: > Improve multi-line function argument alignment according to the code style > guidelines. Resolves checkpatch feedback: "Alignment should match > open parenthesis". > > Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com> WARNING: From:/Signed-off-by: email address mismatch: 'From: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com>' != 'Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>' Which email should I use? Ideally you should post from the same email as the Signed-off-by. Regards, Hans > --- > drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c | 4 ++-- > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c > index 2b71de722ec3..6be3ee1d93a5 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c > @@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ static int __gc0310_buf_reg_array(struct i2c_client *client, > } > > static int __gc0310_write_reg_is_consecutive(struct i2c_client *client, > - struct gc0310_write_ctrl *ctrl, > - const struct gc0310_reg *next) > + struct gc0310_write_ctrl *ctrl, > + const struct gc0310_reg *next) > { > if (ctrl->index == 0) > return 1; > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c > index 78147ffb6099..6ba4a8adff7c 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c > @@ -171,8 +171,8 @@ static int __gc2235_buf_reg_array(struct i2c_client *client, > } > > static int __gc2235_write_reg_is_consecutive(struct i2c_client *client, > - struct gc2235_write_ctrl *ctrl, > - const struct gc2235_reg *next) > + struct gc2235_write_ctrl *ctrl, > + const struct gc2235_reg *next) > { > if (ctrl->index == 0) > return 1; > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c > index eecefcd734d0..aec7392fd1de 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c > @@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ static int __ov2722_buf_reg_array(struct i2c_client *client, > } > > static int __ov2722_write_reg_is_consecutive(struct i2c_client *client, > - struct ov2722_write_ctrl *ctrl, > - const struct ov2722_reg *next) > + struct ov2722_write_ctrl *ctrl, > + const struct ov2722_reg *next) > { > if (ctrl->index == 0) > return 1; >
On 20/04/2021 10:39, Fabio Aiuto wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:45:57AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote: >> Mixed case variable names are discouraged and they result in checkpatch >> script "Avoid CamelCase" warnings. Replace such CamelCase variable names >> by lower case strings according to the coding style guidelines. >> >> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com> >> --- >> .../media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-mt9m114.c | 62 +++++++++---------- >> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-mt9m114.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-mt9m114.c >> index 160bb58ce708..e63906a69e30 100644 >> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-mt9m114.c >> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-mt9m114.c >> @@ -999,10 +999,10 @@ static long mt9m114_s_exposure(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, >> struct mt9m114_device *dev = to_mt9m114_sensor(sd); >> int ret = 0; >> unsigned int coarse_integration = 0; >> - unsigned int FLines = 0; >> - unsigned int FrameLengthLines = 0; /* ExposureTime.FrameLengthLines; */ >> - unsigned int AnalogGain, DigitalGain; >> - u32 AnalogGainToWrite = 0; >> + unsigned int f_lines = 0; >> + unsigned int frame_len_lines = 0; /* ExposureTime.FrameLengthLines; */ >> + unsigned int analog_gain, digital_gain; >> + u32 analog_gain_to_write = 0; >> > > this patch is made of multiple logical changes, i.e. more than one > variable at a time are renamed. Maybe this should be split in > one patch per variable name. I'm OK with this, it's pretty readable and obvious what is going on. Regards, Hans
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 03:24:32PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 19/04/2021 21:12, Deepak R Varma wrote: > > Improve multi-line function argument alignment according to the code style > > guidelines. Resolves checkpatch feedback: "Alignment should match > > open parenthesis". > > > > Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com> > > WARNING: From:/Signed-off-by: email address mismatch: 'From: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com>' != 'Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma > <drv@mailo.com>' > > Which email should I use? Ideally you should post from the same email > as the Signed-off-by. I am really sorry for this. I was trying to set up mutt to handle both my accounts and guess that led to this issue. I will resubmit the patch set with the appropriate email match. Will that be okay? Thank you, deepak. > > Regards, > > Hans > > > --- > > drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c | 4 ++-- > > drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c | 4 ++-- > > drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c | 4 ++-- > > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c > > index 2b71de722ec3..6be3ee1d93a5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c > > @@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ static int __gc0310_buf_reg_array(struct i2c_client *client, > > } > > > > static int __gc0310_write_reg_is_consecutive(struct i2c_client *client, > > - struct gc0310_write_ctrl *ctrl, > > - const struct gc0310_reg *next) > > + struct gc0310_write_ctrl *ctrl, > > + const struct gc0310_reg *next) > > { > > if (ctrl->index == 0) > > return 1; > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c > > index 78147ffb6099..6ba4a8adff7c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c > > @@ -171,8 +171,8 @@ static int __gc2235_buf_reg_array(struct i2c_client *client, > > } > > > > static int __gc2235_write_reg_is_consecutive(struct i2c_client *client, > > - struct gc2235_write_ctrl *ctrl, > > - const struct gc2235_reg *next) > > + struct gc2235_write_ctrl *ctrl, > > + const struct gc2235_reg *next) > > { > > if (ctrl->index == 0) > > return 1; > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c > > index eecefcd734d0..aec7392fd1de 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c > > @@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ static int __ov2722_buf_reg_array(struct i2c_client *client, > > } > > > > static int __ov2722_write_reg_is_consecutive(struct i2c_client *client, > > - struct ov2722_write_ctrl *ctrl, > > - const struct ov2722_reg *next) > > + struct ov2722_write_ctrl *ctrl, > > + const struct ov2722_reg *next) > > { > > if (ctrl->index == 0) > > return 1; > > >
On 20/04/2021 19:19, Deepak R Varma wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 03:24:32PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> On 19/04/2021 21:12, Deepak R Varma wrote: >>> Improve multi-line function argument alignment according to the code style >>> guidelines. Resolves checkpatch feedback: "Alignment should match >>> open parenthesis". >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com> >> >> WARNING: From:/Signed-off-by: email address mismatch: 'From: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com>' != 'Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma >> <drv@mailo.com>' >> >> Which email should I use? Ideally you should post from the same email >> as the Signed-off-by. > > I am really sorry for this. I was trying to set up mutt to handle both > my accounts and guess that led to this issue. I will resubmit the patch > set with the appropriate email match. Will that be okay? It is sufficient to just let me know which email I should use. I can edit it so it shows the correct author email. Regards, Hans > > Thank you, > deepak. > >> >> Regards, >> >> Hans >> >>> --- >>> drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c | 4 ++-- >>> drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c | 4 ++-- >>> drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c | 4 ++-- >>> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c >>> index 2b71de722ec3..6be3ee1d93a5 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c >>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c >>> @@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ static int __gc0310_buf_reg_array(struct i2c_client *client, >>> } >>> >>> static int __gc0310_write_reg_is_consecutive(struct i2c_client *client, >>> - struct gc0310_write_ctrl *ctrl, >>> - const struct gc0310_reg *next) >>> + struct gc0310_write_ctrl *ctrl, >>> + const struct gc0310_reg *next) >>> { >>> if (ctrl->index == 0) >>> return 1; >>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c >>> index 78147ffb6099..6ba4a8adff7c 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c >>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c >>> @@ -171,8 +171,8 @@ static int __gc2235_buf_reg_array(struct i2c_client *client, >>> } >>> >>> static int __gc2235_write_reg_is_consecutive(struct i2c_client *client, >>> - struct gc2235_write_ctrl *ctrl, >>> - const struct gc2235_reg *next) >>> + struct gc2235_write_ctrl *ctrl, >>> + const struct gc2235_reg *next) >>> { >>> if (ctrl->index == 0) >>> return 1; >>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c >>> index eecefcd734d0..aec7392fd1de 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c >>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c >>> @@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ static int __ov2722_buf_reg_array(struct i2c_client *client, >>> } >>> >>> static int __ov2722_write_reg_is_consecutive(struct i2c_client *client, >>> - struct ov2722_write_ctrl *ctrl, >>> - const struct ov2722_reg *next) >>> + struct ov2722_write_ctrl *ctrl, >>> + const struct ov2722_reg *next) >>> { >>> if (ctrl->index == 0) >>> return 1; >>> >>
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:59:16PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 20/04/2021 19:19, Deepak R Varma wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 03:24:32PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > >> On 19/04/2021 21:12, Deepak R Varma wrote: > >>> Improve multi-line function argument alignment according to the code style > >>> guidelines. Resolves checkpatch feedback: "Alignment should match > >>> open parenthesis". > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com> > >> > >> WARNING: From:/Signed-off-by: email address mismatch: 'From: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com>' != 'Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma > >> <drv@mailo.com>' > >> > >> Which email should I use? Ideally you should post from the same email > >> as the Signed-off-by. > > > > I am really sorry for this. I was trying to set up mutt to handle both > > my accounts and guess that led to this issue. I will resubmit the patch > > set with the appropriate email match. Will that be okay? > > It is sufficient to just let me know which email I should use. I can edit > it so it shows the correct author email. Hello Hans, You can use drv@mailo.com as the signed off email id. I have received feedback on other patches of this set, so I am going to resubmit the patch set v1 from the correct email ID. Thank you, deepak. > > Regards, > > Hans > > > > > Thank you, > > deepak. > > > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Hans > >> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c | 4 ++-- > >>> drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c | 4 ++-- > >>> drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c | 4 ++-- > >>> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c > >>> index 2b71de722ec3..6be3ee1d93a5 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c > >>> @@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ static int __gc0310_buf_reg_array(struct i2c_client *client, > >>> } > >>> > >>> static int __gc0310_write_reg_is_consecutive(struct i2c_client *client, > >>> - struct gc0310_write_ctrl *ctrl, > >>> - const struct gc0310_reg *next) > >>> + struct gc0310_write_ctrl *ctrl, > >>> + const struct gc0310_reg *next) > >>> { > >>> if (ctrl->index == 0) > >>> return 1; > >>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c > >>> index 78147ffb6099..6ba4a8adff7c 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c > >>> @@ -171,8 +171,8 @@ static int __gc2235_buf_reg_array(struct i2c_client *client, > >>> } > >>> > >>> static int __gc2235_write_reg_is_consecutive(struct i2c_client *client, > >>> - struct gc2235_write_ctrl *ctrl, > >>> - const struct gc2235_reg *next) > >>> + struct gc2235_write_ctrl *ctrl, > >>> + const struct gc2235_reg *next) > >>> { > >>> if (ctrl->index == 0) > >>> return 1; > >>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c > >>> index eecefcd734d0..aec7392fd1de 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c > >>> @@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ static int __ov2722_buf_reg_array(struct i2c_client *client, > >>> } > >>> > >>> static int __ov2722_write_reg_is_consecutive(struct i2c_client *client, > >>> - struct ov2722_write_ctrl *ctrl, > >>> - const struct ov2722_reg *next) > >>> + struct ov2722_write_ctrl *ctrl, > >>> + const struct ov2722_reg *next) > >>> { > >>> if (ctrl->index == 0) > >>> return 1; > >>> > >> >