| Message ID | 20201106151411.321743-1-maxime@cerno.tech |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | sunxi: Remove the calls to dma_direct_set_offset | expand |
Hi Christoph, Chen-Yu, Hans, On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 05:07:37PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Thanks, > > this looks good to me: > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > > Can you include this patch at the end of your series to that it gets > picked up with the other patches? I guess the easiest to avoid bisection issues would be to merge all this through drm-misc, would that work for you? Maxime
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 10:43:03AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Christoph, Chen-Yu, Hans, > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 05:07:37PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Thanks, > > > > this looks good to me: > > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > > > > Can you include this patch at the end of your series to that it gets > > picked up with the other patches? > > I guess the easiest to avoid bisection issues would be to merge all this > through drm-misc, would that work for you? Fine with me!
On 06/11/2020 16:14, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > Here's an attempt to removing the dma_direct_set_offset calls we have in > numerous drivers and move all those quirks into a global notifier as suggested > by Robin. For patches 4-7: Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl> It's fine by me if this series is merged via the drm subsystem. Regards, Hans > > Let me know what you think, > Maxime > > Maxime Ripard (7): > drm/sun4i: backend: Fix probe failure with multiple backends > soc: sunxi: Deal with the MBUS DMA offsets in a central place > drm/sun4i: backend: Remove the MBUS quirks > media: sun4i: Remove the MBUS quirks > media: sun6i: Remove the MBUS quirks > media: cedrus: Remove the MBUS quirks > media: sun8i-di: Remove the call to of_dma_configure > > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c | 13 -- > .../platform/sunxi/sun4i-csi/sun4i_csi.c | 27 ---- > .../platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c | 17 --- > .../media/platform/sunxi/sun8i-di/sun8i-di.c | 4 - > drivers/soc/sunxi/Kconfig | 8 ++ > drivers/soc/sunxi/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_mbus.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus.c | 1 - > drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus.h | 3 - > .../staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_hw.c | 18 --- > 10 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_mbus.c >
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 10:43:03AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Christoph, Chen-Yu, Hans, > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 05:07:37PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Thanks, > > > > this looks good to me: > > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > > > > Can you include this patch at the end of your series to that it gets > > picked up with the other patches? > > I guess the easiest to avoid bisection issues would be to merge all this > through drm-misc, would that work for you? Is this going to get picked up in drm-misc? I don't see it in linux-next so far.
Hi Christoph, On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 08:59:59AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 10:43:03AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi Christoph, Chen-Yu, Hans, > > > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 05:07:37PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Thanks, > > > > > > this looks good to me: > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > > > > > > Can you include this patch at the end of your series to that it gets > > > picked up with the other patches? > > > > I guess the easiest to avoid bisection issues would be to merge all this > > through drm-misc, would that work for you? > > Is this going to get picked up in drm-misc? I don't see it in linux-next > so far. After some discussion with Arnd and Daniel, this will go through arm-soc, and I sent the PR here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20201118091303.wa5npxyop3cdsczb@gilmour.lan/ It hasn't been merged yet though Maxime