From patchwork Tue Oct 1 16:06:24 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Deepak Gupta X-Patchwork-Id: 832123 Received: from mail-pg1-f177.google.com (mail-pg1-f177.google.com [209.85.215.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCBD31CBEBE for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 16:07:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.177 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727798873; cv=none; b=StSLgXeuKyk/UysIxbrjDSZP5oVNNdbq3xcyxJHHdFyNJClZpgRxc1uB9gfmk38nbHuOa/NyW2nGWUBSm0oU7FfFSZO3SbVcymQtRPsKc0YRpOque1SXVBFiN1+VaUAXySvHB9EJAvlq0lb/4moXO+EJpBRA4SduUFxNmXG5Auo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727798873; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/3LtN18AmUsV30cQax3vK8avkDzEHRJjBGsWQ+1XtvM=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=scAHYuMxU+NlCv5nYDzZ6JBdJ37gjDaKze5PWgIzZrxT/DNUFbo9Ea4mmSeqFg05cgn+kSKP2suoRhaKVlhDHW1haMv6D1ziXMuudNiMvPMy9KcXxk+mVgSBe2R78sc4OMhNtjqJZmEGU/t4IeunKs3symETltDdwWwOQwWELsM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=erbH4v4M; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.177 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="erbH4v4M" Received: by mail-pg1-f177.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-7db233cef22so4741518a12.0 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2024 09:07:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1727798871; x=1728403671; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=NXAvbRYD1Q1ho1rLmqewAH55Q8KmYmnFeXkf6c6XC6M=; b=erbH4v4MzuAXARs1BAvaMnBIr8NdrZOCJ+G19y7KSwRHJ+lWNahJq5R0DKKyELCUbD kpB4Iz1gi0LEC+RE7e9n60br1xreQZgSJhnaGpgSZHHLmsNQLwrWKLNLPDP0XvabbVMg G2Qq6dtK7idcJDHDdFRBrHezWQUrJwK1b2R9H6FDMto2TMrybuS58/CFFPEKZ33zvxMd dWjI15rr8GfaTD38F+9HMpaVqqtuidgCLuuZHWlv1eWGPKcZcuP1sM54UqFq03nqW4id waPHiYeiHLoyRZMHNEXdSo7Kxum6Siavc+CO1+WtMBWPS84nvBCAQ7OAkBWbAnSZW6rt EPiQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1727798871; x=1728403671; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NXAvbRYD1Q1ho1rLmqewAH55Q8KmYmnFeXkf6c6XC6M=; b=AgN2SvVQdeutf2IFNFsvrQY5zzO7YGfPtReYHCLBPcgyuW2fG7HE4XBn0P8TxkLpve thGybcLHMfdqkE79TvysR4b7lS1Le046pMqKJkQMTQrCf6ZSmrc8zqjKc2/6tvPqYmcd gqhN9L2+ngNU52Pf/fhHOXN1Tlax7oolf+V59qw7BiQZxGF5lI+Q7vmzEoTOh7CgMCc7 U3KDfgOHgm3Tnwtg1N4U9LBpJ18F+jMTfdkvT4DAQWZSLOC0wQUDw4Q81hrdaDq1m5p9 R9soJMX5dhyWxrwhcdioCjStR19YD/6q/yvQnMvutSUYK1rM/iVLBbJAoBvFKNzoSc0X CGww== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXeWHpD1Dx8sou1dL7qQyXvrLRWw+3EoisN0KbJ3ta8wDaC5SnbO3r7KGvEB2A6HP0I92F6Y65+rSC8QuBKYmo=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy4qX0B2+TiOQf+B6Q1YZ3rbQUyGllgjggeUmbTM5vrgwLQo2iG r9+boQhltD+A0HRnPa4bzvkENuX5j6oruHf6dE57wKYdZorIGflYITZZKwjTqjE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEdFiTPZh83JuVojwJkJAxLnQhFX7Kjf5puPeQo/q6uacYSkkP+0Jjd72vQ2I4kXed1EqwuJg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:224c:b0:2d8:8808:5154 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e1849eca9amr165298a91.40.1727798871001; Tue, 01 Oct 2024 09:07:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debug.ba.rivosinc.com ([64.71.180.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e06e1d7d47sm13843973a91.28.2024.10.01.09.07.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 01 Oct 2024 09:07:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Deepak Gupta Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 09:06:24 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 19/33] riscv: Implements arch agnostic shadow stack prctls Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20241001-v5_user_cfi_series-v1-19-3ba65b6e550f@rivosinc.com> References: <20241001-v5_user_cfi_series-v1-0-3ba65b6e550f@rivosinc.com> In-Reply-To: <20241001-v5_user_cfi_series-v1-0-3ba65b6e550f@rivosinc.com> To: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , "Liam R. Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Lorenzo Stoakes , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Conor Dooley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Arnd Bergmann , Christian Brauner , Peter Zijlstra , Oleg Nesterov , Eric Biederman , Kees Cook , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, alistair.francis@wdc.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, jim.shu@sifive.com, andybnac@gmail.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com, charlie@rivosinc.com, atishp@rivosinc.com, evan@rivosinc.com, cleger@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com, samitolvanen@google.com, broonie@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, Deepak Gupta X-Mailer: b4 0.14.0 Implement architecture agnostic prctls() interface for setting and getting shadow stack status. prctls implemented are PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS and PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS. As part of PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS/PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, only PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE is implemented because RISCV allows each mode to write to their own shadow stack using `sspush` or `ssamoswap`. PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS locks current configuration of shadow stack enabling. Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta --- arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h | 18 ++++++- arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 8 +++ arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h index 719e28e043c8..52850a2c79cf 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ #include +#include struct task_struct; struct kernel_clone_args; @@ -14,7 +15,8 @@ struct kernel_clone_args; #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI struct cfi_status { unsigned long ubcfi_en : 1; /* Enable for backward cfi. */ - unsigned long rsvd : ((sizeof(unsigned long)*8) - 1); + unsigned long ubcfi_locked : 1; + unsigned long rsvd : ((sizeof(unsigned long)*8) - 2); unsigned long user_shdw_stk; /* Current user shadow stack pointer */ unsigned long shdw_stk_base; /* Base address of shadow stack */ unsigned long shdw_stk_size; /* size of shadow stack */ @@ -27,6 +29,12 @@ void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, unsigned unsigned long get_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *size); void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr); bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task); +bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task); +bool is_shstk_allocated(struct task_struct *task); +void set_shstk_lock(struct task_struct *task); +void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable); + +#define PR_SHADOW_STACK_SUPPORTED_STATUS_MASK (PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE) #else @@ -42,6 +50,14 @@ bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task); #define is_shstk_enabled(task) false +#define is_shstk_locked(task) false + +#define is_shstk_allocated(task) false + +#define set_shstk_lock(task) + +#define set_shstk_status(task, enable) + #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI */ #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c index f6f58b1ed905..f7dec532657f 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c @@ -152,6 +152,14 @@ void start_thread(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long pc, regs->epc = pc; regs->sp = sp; + /* + * clear shadow stack state on exec. + * libc will set it later via prctl. + */ + set_shstk_status(current, false); + set_shstk_base(current, 0, 0); + set_active_shstk(current, 0); + #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT regs->status &= ~SR_UXL; diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c index 7a7f0b57b2d4..c77abe552c88 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c @@ -24,6 +24,16 @@ bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task) return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_en ? true : false; } +bool is_shstk_allocated(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_base ? true : false; +} + +bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_locked ? true : false; +} + void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, unsigned long size) { task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_base = shstk_addr; @@ -42,6 +52,23 @@ void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr) task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.user_shdw_stk = shstk_addr; } +void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable) +{ + task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_en = enable ? 1 : 0; + + if (enable) + task->thread_info.envcfg |= ENVCFG_SSE; + else + task->thread_info.envcfg &= ~ENVCFG_SSE; + + csr_write(CSR_ENVCFG, task->thread_info.envcfg); +} + +void set_shstk_lock(struct task_struct *task) +{ + task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_locked = 1; +} + /* * If size is 0, then to be compatible with regular stack we want it to be as big as * regular stack. Else PAGE_ALIGN it and return back @@ -264,3 +291,83 @@ void shstk_release(struct task_struct *tsk) vm_munmap(base, size); set_shstk_base(tsk, 0, 0); } + +int arch_get_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long __user *status) +{ + unsigned long bcfi_status = 0; + + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack()) + return -EINVAL; + + /* this means shadow stack is enabled on the task */ + bcfi_status |= (is_shstk_enabled(t) ? PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE : 0); + + return copy_to_user(status, &bcfi_status, sizeof(bcfi_status)) ? -EFAULT : 0; +} + +int arch_set_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status) +{ + unsigned long size = 0, addr = 0; + bool enable_shstk = false; + + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack()) + return -EINVAL; + + /* Reject unknown flags */ + if (status & ~PR_SHADOW_STACK_SUPPORTED_STATUS_MASK) + return -EINVAL; + + /* bcfi status is locked and further can't be modified by user */ + if (is_shstk_locked(t)) + return -EINVAL; + + enable_shstk = status & PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE; + /* Request is to enable shadow stack and shadow stack is not enabled already */ + if (enable_shstk && !is_shstk_enabled(t)) { + /* shadow stack was allocated and enable request again + * no need to support such usecase and return EINVAL. + */ + if (is_shstk_allocated(t)) + return -EINVAL; + + size = calc_shstk_size(0); + addr = allocate_shadow_stack(0, size, 0, false); + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr)) + return -ENOMEM; + set_shstk_base(t, addr, size); + set_active_shstk(t, addr + size); + } + + /* + * If a request to disable shadow stack happens, let's go ahead and release it + * Although, if CLONE_VFORKed child did this, then in that case we will end up + * not releasing the shadow stack (because it might be needed in parent). Although + * we will disable it for VFORKed child. And if VFORKed child tries to enable again + * then in that case, it'll get entirely new shadow stack because following condition + * are true + * - shadow stack was not enabled for vforked child + * - shadow stack base was anyways pointing to 0 + * This shouldn't be a big issue because we want parent to have availability of shadow + * stack whenever VFORKed child releases resources via exit or exec but at the same + * time we want VFORKed child to break away and establish new shadow stack if it desires + * + */ + if (!enable_shstk) + shstk_release(t); + + set_shstk_status(t, enable_shstk); + return 0; +} + +int arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *task, + unsigned long arg) +{ + /* If shtstk not supported or not enabled on task, nothing to lock here */ + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack() || + !is_shstk_enabled(task)) + return -EINVAL; + + set_shstk_lock(task); + + return 0; +}