From patchwork Tue Sep 3 09:51:11 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: liujing X-Patchwork-Id: 825095 Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta6.chinamobile.com [111.22.67.139]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8756D1A0BF2; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 09:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=111.22.67.139 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725357079; cv=none; b=MHdH1KT9+cLzFDh8tdborzwpbUGHBAZgLge17q/lPQ74oH3YPuVwSy3jI/LPYmmB9n1wBXXsvylz7AsnGO0Fp7go89zpJ2WmiMiV/shiLtL6Ah+ZlLQ+YE8FCzqebwB3pzea4ilCmOBkCVVcY0XPlnINiYfqU1VdlRCRZjTo2cQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725357079; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZEEb8Ts2Geg03O5VWO0y2Q6TSJ7QN5btw8o7LPflcCk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=qds9VYczCInwF5KzlkSOcUZXN7nh8tk2fn8ftXjnBpcWSFuGyHu/LV52fLqvv6n87XsIzNBv+QumOwKQ3N8QU/HhqRA6qn9maODDia87Z54ugmwEpgIj/F784nS5zkLIiTzc16UFpoeicR1YjLLj6mbuBiZjo7qzK6p033+ObvU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cmss.chinamobile.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cmss.chinamobile.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=111.22.67.139 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cmss.chinamobile.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cmss.chinamobile.com X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0 X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000 Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[10.188.0.87]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app01-12001 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee166d6dc12870-ac172; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 17:51:14 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee166d6dc12870-ac172 X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0 X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown[223.108.79.103]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr06-12006 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee666d6dc11f2a-e0df0; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 17:51:14 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee666d6dc11f2a-e0df0 From: Liu Jing To: davem@davemloft.net Cc: edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liu Jing Subject: [PATCH] selftests/net: do_setcpu function not need to have a return value Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 17:51:11 +0800 Message-Id: <20240903095111.7204-1-liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 in the do_setcpu, this function does not need to have a return value, which is meaningless Signed-off-by: Liu Jing --- tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c index bdc03a2097e8..0b54f2011449 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static uint16_t get_ip_csum(const uint16_t *start, int num_words) return ~sum; } -static int do_setcpu(int cpu) +static void do_setcpu(int cpu) { cpu_set_t mask; @@ -129,7 +129,6 @@ static int do_setcpu(int cpu) else if (cfg_verbose) fprintf(stderr, "cpu: %u\n", cpu); - return 0; } static void do_setsockopt(int fd, int level, int optname, int val)