From patchwork Fri Aug 23 13:05:04 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hariharan Mari X-Patchwork-Id: 822966 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C64D1865FC; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724418606; cv=none; b=glwfJfGiBbJuUztZqAuEI3QnMMplYaR1pvym1vvhuL3loFCswgRfrzRNk/Srd04xdpFWWXEpy+B+r8zguiMMbQwTtr4JbUfplG6jaTYgJ1oGQpQ5+YKjG7cWkDoSICJ3T4Ys2yPfSkArpRM6PX/Izox8rhrAM88IIfS7IapSF6E= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724418606; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HljRyvQOxyfutochBFODMTaI7c1jcXnV5+I+uAdhxMk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=gLymk4T4m8Ku0FNxYZ+n0BZPojMjuyCphrj0/eOvP1UacPp7LjnL6e0++Nm/BNicsyGYcy03CLU8xSDdYlAmPEyqqacj/JcH2OgZ/hJ0uAUdZX3L+cqCIlPjnK+IWhYac/3DSJuTNivMVSYdyFycBCq4uPA/y9tXiAMm+fv74yU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=NwMMxHcl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="NwMMxHcl" Received: from pps.filterd (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 47N7HD4p001304; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:09:59 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=9MrPagUgBBMMT xG1gT1QeKUZZdJU5HICAOQEwfD7wCk=; b=NwMMxHcl1Ge089YEuOlKsjB5zb9aY bYRWarQS63T3ONDPBTiHhC+dXJFyvMUfGlKdZjnP4LxLaAgsjrXIyvCKB5x6qajG xvWjIOBMrdfkSsXn49MQJ0jStIDBRs6O7nSB5uat6xQoXOJgmelGsWpe/pGNl90P g8C2oHYwldREntDqO5ukM4WD7sRwKYYLJj6MvUDvnq/M9zB1iU5+LIyuyqATlCJf ThZAYWBce4R6drYblsDjeh1m1kacGAcmg1m2U/W1OQfZxduuSzL/ELsXybUEdb8P PxMxyMT9hPkqDxJJcEPZJPii6Qc/GBQ4OVtRhUO3/d6CDlFmVCL/STnow== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 412mbgc0mp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:09:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0353725.ppops.net (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.0.8/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 47ND9wbp027911; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:09:58 GMT Received: from ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dd.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.221]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 412mbgc0mh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:09:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 47NCVNBl029237; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:09:57 GMT Received: from smtprelay02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.226]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4138dmsqr2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:09:57 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 47ND9qEL37159288 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:09:54 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6E12004E; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:09:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8E920049; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:09:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from a46lp38.lnxne.boe (unknown [9.152.108.100]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:09:51 +0000 (GMT) From: Hariharan Mari To: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, schlameuss@linux.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: s390: selftests: Add regression tests for SORTL and DFLTCC CPU subfunctions Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 15:05:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20240823130947.38323-2-hari55@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.2 In-Reply-To: <20240823130947.38323-1-hari55@linux.ibm.com> References: <20240823130947.38323-1-hari55@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: jaaAGmI-3tLzxfeprBXERAETIhYhIJ4n X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: UiHWL3P-R2uFOIvUxXkIx7vK6lR1WwKE X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.28.16 definitions=2024-08-23_10,2024-08-22_01,2024-05-17_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2407110000 definitions=main-2408230095 Introduce new regression tests to verify the ASM inline block in the SORTL and DFLTCC CPU subfunctions for the s390x architecture. These tests ensure that future changes to the ASM code are properly validated. The test procedure: 1. Create a VM and request the KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE_SUBFUNC attribute from the KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MODEL group for this VM. This SUBFUNC attribute contains the results of all CPU subfunction instructions. 2. For each tested subfunction (SORTL and DFLTCC), execute the corresponding ASM instruction and capture the result array. 3. Perform a memory comparison between the results stored in the SUBFUNC attribute (obtained in step 1) and the ASM instruction results (obtained in step 2) for each tested subfunction. This process ensures that the KVM implementation accurately reflects the behavior of the actual CPU instructions for the tested subfunctions. Suggested-by: Janosch Frank Signed-off-by: Hariharan Mari Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 2 + .../selftests/kvm/include/s390x/facility.h | 50 +++++++++ .../selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/facility.c | 14 +++ .../kvm/s390x/cpumodel_subfuncs_test.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 171 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/facility.h create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/facility.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/cpumodel_subfuncs_test.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile index ac280dcba996..e989195b5915 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ LIBKVM_aarch64 += lib/aarch64/vgic.c LIBKVM_s390x += lib/s390x/diag318_test_handler.c LIBKVM_s390x += lib/s390x/processor.c LIBKVM_s390x += lib/s390x/ucall.c +LIBKVM_s390x += lib/s390x/facility.c LIBKVM_riscv += lib/riscv/handlers.S LIBKVM_riscv += lib/riscv/processor.c @@ -183,6 +184,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += s390x/sync_regs_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += s390x/tprot TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += s390x/cmma_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += s390x/debug_test +TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += s390x/cpumodel_subfuncs_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += s390x/shared_zeropage_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += demand_paging_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += dirty_log_test diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/facility.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/facility.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..a960331d23ec --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/facility.h @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ +/* + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2024 + * + * Authors: + * Hariharan Mari + * + * Get the facility bits with the STFLE instruction + */ + +#ifndef SELFTEST_KVM_FACILITY_H +#define SELFTEST_KVM_FACILITY_H + +#include + +/* alt_stfle_fac_list[16] + stfle_fac_list[16] */ +#define NB_STFL_DOUBLEWORDS 32 + +extern uint64_t stfl_doublewords[NB_STFL_DOUBLEWORDS]; +extern bool stfle_flag; + +static inline bool test_bit_inv(unsigned long nr, const unsigned long *ptr) +{ + return test_bit(nr ^ (BITS_PER_LONG - 1), ptr); +} + +static inline void stfle(uint64_t *fac, unsigned int nb_doublewords) +{ + register unsigned long r0 asm("0") = nb_doublewords - 1; + + asm volatile(" .insn s,0xb2b00000,0(%1)\n" + : "+d" (r0) + : "a" (fac) + : "memory", "cc"); +} + +static inline void setup_facilities(void) +{ + stfle(stfl_doublewords, NB_STFL_DOUBLEWORDS); + stfle_flag = true; +} + +static inline bool test_facility(int nr) +{ + if (!stfle_flag) + setup_facilities(); + return test_bit_inv(nr, stfl_doublewords); +} + +#endif diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/facility.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/facility.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d540812d911a --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/facility.c @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2024 + * + * Authors: + * Hariharan Mari + * + * Contains the definition for the global variables to have the test facitlity feature. + */ + +#include "facility.h" + +uint64_t stfl_doublewords[NB_STFL_DOUBLEWORDS]; +bool stfle_flag; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/cpumodel_subfuncs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/cpumodel_subfuncs_test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ee525c841767 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/cpumodel_subfuncs_test.c @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2024 + * + * Authors: + * Hariharan Mari + * + * The tests compare the result of the KVM ioctl for obtaining CPU subfunction data with those + * from an ASM block performing the same CPU subfunction. Currently KVM doesn't mask instruction + * query data reported via the CPU Model, allowing us to directly compare it with the data + * acquired through executing the queries in the test. + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include "facility.h" + +#include "kvm_util.h" + +/* Query available CPU subfunctions */ +struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_subfunc cpu_subfunc; + +static void get_cpu_machine_subfuntions(struct kvm_vm *vm, + struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_subfunc *cpu_subfunc) +{ + int r; + + r = __kvm_device_attr_get(vm->fd, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MODEL, + KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE_SUBFUNC, cpu_subfunc); + + TEST_ASSERT(!r, "Get cpu subfunctions failed r=%d errno=%d", r, errno); +} + +/* Testing Sort Lists (SORTL) CPU subfunction's ASM block */ +static void test_sortl_asm_block(u8 (*query)[32]) +{ + asm volatile(" lghi 0,0\n" + " la 1,%[query]\n" + " .insn rre,0xb9380000,2,4\n" + : [query] "=R" (*query) + : + : "cc", "0", "1"); +} + +/* Testing Deflate Conversion Call (DFLTCC) CPU subfunction's ASM block */ +static void test_dfltcc_asm_block(u8 (*query)[32]) +{ + asm volatile(" lghi 0,0\n" + " la 1,%[query]\n" + " .insn rrf,0xb9390000,2,4,6,0\n" + : [query] "=R" (*query) + : + : "cc", "0", "1"); +} + +typedef void (*testfunc_t)(u8 (*array)[]); + +struct testdef { + const char *subfunc_name; + u8 *subfunc_array; + size_t array_size; + testfunc_t test; + int facility_bit; +} testlist[] = { + /* SORTL - Facility bit 150 */ + { "SORTL", cpu_subfunc.sortl, sizeof(cpu_subfunc.sortl), test_sortl_asm_block, 150 }, + /* DFLTCC - Facility bit 151 */ + { "DFLTCC", cpu_subfunc.dfltcc, sizeof(cpu_subfunc.dfltcc), test_dfltcc_asm_block, 151 }, +}; + +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) +{ + struct kvm_vm *vm; + int idx; + + ksft_print_header(); + + vm = vm_create(1); + + memset(&cpu_subfunc, 0, sizeof(cpu_subfunc)); + get_cpu_machine_subfuntions(vm, &cpu_subfunc); + + ksft_set_plan(ARRAY_SIZE(testlist)); + for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(testlist); idx++) { + if (test_facility(testlist[idx].facility_bit)) { + u8 *array = malloc(testlist[idx].array_size); + + testlist[idx].test((u8 (*)[testlist[idx].array_size])array); + + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(memcmp(testlist[idx].subfunc_array, + array, testlist[idx].array_size), 0); + + ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", testlist[idx].subfunc_name); + free(array); + } else { + ksft_test_result_skip("%s feature is not avaialable\n", + testlist[idx].subfunc_name); + } + } + + kvm_vm_free(vm); + ksft_finished(); +}