From patchwork Wed Aug 7 21:51:39 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Thomas_Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= X-Patchwork-Id: 817514 Received: from todd.t-8ch.de (todd.t-8ch.de [159.69.126.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D3F7156646; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 21:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=159.69.126.157 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723067526; cv=none; b=EztrcYX68IPgMFoZkVmcfBZcNudxjpyJBhssE3URbuNKlKvMda/DINI1ndi2Zi3EwJeAzNidnMoBJ1iYwoquQtluK73/InNSfNPrdCSWK69tYsgwG4er+eBt055CwPnIlt4ajbujsKqcLesReWAxQOH93qO6398Zc6kuotm8sn0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723067526; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1QhxkVf3uYyMNNfNQNnEZrKfY/yCzs9TKeRStDwW9/c=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=iVfV7dvV3PnR6ImgW0oMMSjLFSNSx/OZv/2ctSJZaa1ge91u7qyyKSbk9eWduGSaTkkTwGTV7bWhtjFlFLTbcv0clGr/VkQ4dC2HIkonWyGR208clBv7R6oeKC+PMHXTRzhreB/B9VL6d/hj7qUEtzouUBxGfEf/IUW3VOl4QDg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=weissschuh.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=weissschuh.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=weissschuh.net header.i=@weissschuh.net header.b=brLJN4tG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=159.69.126.157 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=weissschuh.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=weissschuh.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=weissschuh.net header.i=@weissschuh.net header.b="brLJN4tG" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=weissschuh.net; s=mail; t=1723067510; bh=1QhxkVf3uYyMNNfNQNnEZrKfY/yCzs9TKeRStDwW9/c=; h=From:Date:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=brLJN4tG7nuJcRo7F6gHXUxQxiQjfvO+AXjk9ztVT2xnZvcH60ussVRaEqWbVRR8U 0W6hGqD2vPLqDhkbcIokK71hmWxQbH5OYe3fCy364dPOMNqukQoyRQWPa+Sqqw1Q7I G4AMtforlH8o4cg3abz82e2mUuBZ1xNes1yrpowg= From: =?utf-8?q?Thomas_Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 23:51:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 03/15] tools/nolibc: powerpc: limit stack-protector workaround to GCC Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20240807-nolibc-llvm-v2-3-c20f2f5fc7c2@weissschuh.net> References: <20240807-nolibc-llvm-v2-0-c20f2f5fc7c2@weissschuh.net> In-Reply-To: <20240807-nolibc-llvm-v2-0-c20f2f5fc7c2@weissschuh.net> To: Willy Tarreau , Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?q?Thomas_Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= X-Mailer: b4 0.14.1 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; t=1723067509; l=1020; i=linux@weissschuh.net; s=20221212; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=1QhxkVf3uYyMNNfNQNnEZrKfY/yCzs9TKeRStDwW9/c=; b=jcxH1PjB1MjV0zoFCKqh0tGskIv4ZpblDDUXgw2mm1q0vOUwYSW+Uf9IkpmOnZO0cJUpt3VFo MFPki47281iDp1sEkACyBLB+Pq4ctoBVzGMddUz3YOkgVpKSyWZiW5n X-Developer-Key: i=linux@weissschuh.net; a=ed25519; pk=KcycQgFPX2wGR5azS7RhpBqedglOZVgRPfdFSPB1LNw= As mentioned in the comment, the workaround for __attribute__((no_stack_protector)) is only necessary on GCC. Avoid applying the workaround on clang, as clang does not recognize __attribute__((__optimize__)) and would fail. Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh --- tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h index ac212e6185b2..41ebd394b90c 100644 --- a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ _ret; \ }) -#ifndef __powerpc64__ +#if !defined(__powerpc64__) && !defined(__clang__) /* FIXME: For 32-bit PowerPC, with newer gcc compilers (e.g. gcc 13.1.0), * "omit-frame-pointer" fails with __attribute__((no_stack_protector)) but * works with __attribute__((__optimize__("-fno-stack-protector")))