From patchwork Thu Jan 25 06:21:50 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Deepak Gupta X-Patchwork-Id: 767854 Received: from mail-pg1-f176.google.com (mail-pg1-f176.google.com [209.85.215.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDB0D1C68C for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 06:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.176 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706164231; cv=none; b=jsC6yHmpd5ZnVGfa5MtmSlLxxTIZuNqO0ISGx/QPmN7AOR2KYhYWwdecdxo1WQRuFQNMioH3spNz0VE8q78emDEnOVNMLKctH9kVPbErfrgowwAKydUFw0GQ589R5YgNFg/4MHAvpifeWeaTLtPptrnm9wUQsW4EDu84XA2quDk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706164231; c=relaxed/simple; bh=stTxMEJ1J+zrWQ2VZ2iGvhywhLMwvXxQb6zN5ykRo7k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=twZaq+uWnZOLcbFA3c5QV9kT1NVijHqcg0M4NVUmgc3txOuV2q+fLXo7fhH+zlPi5yfHwcLtNqUu6WCUifk0cBxc9L/N3mcUVMN9wwwB39nsB1bWAJQQtgvmmJqMExnVQjRj2SbTjPjl1ztfcKvz4Avbv5AoDox6Z44j7223lGU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=Mxo8QNtg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.176 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="Mxo8QNtg" Received: by mail-pg1-f176.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5d46a378f74so1521186a12.0 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:30:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1706164229; x=1706769029; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ScAq7kzOpFXx9iuEbGscFFsYaARnx8WzTHX43jvaj1I=; b=Mxo8QNtgkurK8OLbhOe+bwBNqHiG6EDkf8Gh2893NH4eWY/XU1hnjOzZB1sKPIfviu Za0qWSBlTEuD6ZlkULIuc/wK1UUtbxSHQ/CeV8ucUNHCTiem1uM0lQpXGDCACIj+E/fY zcBIdjmNRkL+5LUeF4UW7wjX83m+jJlj/nbZSgSG65PWUt6yELW4RM7GzKVqTsJf2s1y EThTQ5++7Lbg1GBwXXIM4Vn5XEj0MSYzPh50MjmcOf/9iR1Q9n27IxHO6yU5YU+mg/39 Ug7ZxnUf4ySlzPZ7YkyMb8xpg3RWVfW5wrl4jzBPQdNX63fwdDDXfOOiFWlY+bkgyD8A Ukhg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706164229; x=1706769029; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ScAq7kzOpFXx9iuEbGscFFsYaARnx8WzTHX43jvaj1I=; b=Ert7WSJ6N+KGZNDSDZAygrQXbicVOgGQdunbYgzQpM5F/oDkB47UrdyltdRfv09YEA /XdcVj+36r5OsFo3cm6fQOY2xsGDUDhdxa50s5NXGShz3FFjMSd7GPunZgIDvyglUY8J etYi+MPwQ1BbuDlYikXa3Qh/qbdwTyUqiO8BEjaF/QQm8xiSPvN3bglsP65bcAfkuxmq fIz1U534JhZoA3K9XCpyneMxG4AgQTWd35v0KxzZlXzJ2KE2/cgQbSdlZGDDbYDpxgk5 dJsZKQNk0UX4vfqgt7adbeTZ43kMeR6ERZx8zCypX9qfeO79F/A/oWDa7IT3ZpKI4iJF y6mg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxu2ouBoat1GSqBsq031PMd5F7rknw76HFrEbNMlftfJJAeNIBD s9NDOCgEqW34arPZP0ic05THF3UffDay0zx6ibtqNXyRM7lwNnYfiJWvzKlsnjA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGFMu/zk3uZuVL2rgIJ/WYlNuRPVsnV3i1mgW4b48YxV5/AYlDfd6d0RfRSciWq754HxSr5pQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:a716:b0:19b:e727:800c with SMTP id by22-20020a056a20a71600b0019be727800cmr543022pzb.109.1706164228936; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:30:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from debug.ba.rivosinc.com ([64.71.180.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t19-20020a056a00139300b006dd870b51b8sm3201139pfg.126.2024.01.24.22.30.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:30:28 -0800 (PST) From: debug@rivosinc.com To: rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, broonie@kernel.org, Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com, keescook@chromium.org, ajones@ventanamicro.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, conor.dooley@microchip.com, cleger@rivosinc.com, atishp@atishpatra.org, alex@ghiti.fr, bjorn@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com Cc: corbet@lwn.net, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, oleg@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, ebiederm@xmission.com, shuah@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, debug@rivosinc.com, guoren@kernel.org, samitolvanen@google.com, evan@rivosinc.com, xiao.w.wang@intel.com, apatel@ventanamicro.com, mchitale@ventanamicro.com, waylingii@gmail.com, greentime.hu@sifive.com, heiko@sntech.de, jszhang@kernel.org, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, david@redhat.com, charlie@rivosinc.com, panqinglin2020@iscas.ac.cn, willy@infradead.org, vincent.chen@sifive.com, andy.chiu@sifive.com, gerg@kernel.org, jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com, mason.huo@starfivetech.com, ancientmodern4@gmail.com, mathis.salmen@matsal.de, cuiyunhui@bytedance.com, bhe@redhat.com, chenjiahao16@huawei.com, ruscur@russell.cc, bgray@linux.ibm.com, alx@kernel.org, baruch@tkos.co.il, zhangqing@loongson.cn, catalin.marinas@arm.com, revest@chromium.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, shr@devkernel.io, omosnace@redhat.com, ojeda@kernel.org, jhubbard@nvidia.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 25/28] riscv/ptrace: riscv cfi status and state via ptrace and in core files Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:21:50 -0800 Message-ID: <20240125062739.1339782-26-debug@rivosinc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20240125062739.1339782-1-debug@rivosinc.com> References: <20240125062739.1339782-1-debug@rivosinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Deepak Gupta Expose a new register type NT_RISCV_USER_CFI for risc-v cfi status and state. Intentionally both landing pad and shadow stack status and state are rolled into cfi state. Creating two different NT_RISCV_USER_XXX would not be useful and wastage of a note type. Enabling or disabling of feature is not allowed via ptrace set interface. However setting `elp` state or setting shadow stack pointer are allowed via ptrace set interface. It is expected `gdb` might have use to fixup `elp` state or `shadow stack` pointer. Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta --- arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 18 ++++++ arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/uapi/linux/elf.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h index a38268b19c3d..512be06a8661 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h @@ -127,6 +127,24 @@ struct __riscv_v_regset_state { */ #define RISCV_MAX_VLENB (8192) +struct __cfi_status { + /* indirect branch tracking state */ + __u64 lp_en : 1; + __u64 lp_lock : 1; + __u64 elp_state : 1; + + /* shadow stack status */ + __u64 shstk_en : 1; + __u64 shstk_lock : 1; + + __u64 rsvd : sizeof(__u64) - 5; +}; + +struct user_cfi_state { + struct __cfi_status cfi_status; + __u64 shstk_ptr; +}; + #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_RISCV_PTRACE_H */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c index 2afe460de16a..8ddd529bef0b 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include enum riscv_regset { REGSET_X, @@ -28,6 +29,9 @@ enum riscv_regset { #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V REGSET_V, #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI + REGSET_CFI, +#endif }; static int riscv_gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, @@ -149,6 +153,75 @@ static int riscv_vr_set(struct task_struct *target, } #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI +static int riscv_cfi_get(struct task_struct *target, + const struct user_regset *regset, + struct membuf to) +{ + struct user_cfi_state user_cfi; + struct pt_regs *regs; + + regs = task_pt_regs(target); + + user_cfi.cfi_status.lp_en = is_indir_lp_enabled(target); + user_cfi.cfi_status.lp_lock = is_indir_lp_locked(target); + user_cfi.cfi_status.elp_state = (regs->status & SR_ELP); + + user_cfi.cfi_status.shstk_en = is_shstk_enabled(target); + user_cfi.cfi_status.shstk_lock = is_shstk_locked(target); + user_cfi.shstk_ptr = get_active_shstk(target); + + return membuf_write(&to, &user_cfi, sizeof(user_cfi)); +} + +/* + * Does it make sense to allowing enable / disable of cfi via ptrace? + * Not allowing enable / disable / locking control via ptrace for now. + * Setting shadow stack pointer is allowed. GDB might use it to unwind or + * some other fixup. Similarly gdb might want to suppress elp and may want + * to reset elp state. + */ +static int riscv_cfi_set(struct task_struct *target, + const struct user_regset *regset, + unsigned int pos, unsigned int count, + const void *kbuf, const void __user *ubuf) +{ + int ret; + struct user_cfi_state user_cfi; + struct pt_regs *regs; + + regs = task_pt_regs(target); + + ret = user_regset_copyin(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf, &user_cfi, 0, -1); + if (ret) + return ret; + + /* + * Not allowing enabling or locking shadow stack or landing pad + * There is no disabling of shadow stack or landing pad via ptrace + * rsvd field should be set to zero so that if those fields are needed in future + */ + if (user_cfi.cfi_status.lp_en || user_cfi.cfi_status.lp_lock || + user_cfi.cfi_status.shstk_en || user_cfi.cfi_status.shstk_lock || + !user_cfi.cfi_status.rsvd) + return -EINVAL; + + /* If lpad is enabled on target and ptrace requests to set / clear elp, do that */ + if (is_indir_lp_enabled(target)) { + if (user_cfi.cfi_status.elp_state) /* set elp state */ + regs->status |= SR_ELP; + else + regs->status &= ~SR_ELP; /* clear elp state */ + } + + /* If shadow stack enabled on target, set new shadow stack pointer */ + if (is_shstk_enabled(target)) + set_active_shstk(target, user_cfi.shstk_ptr); + + return 0; +} +#endif + static const struct user_regset riscv_user_regset[] = { [REGSET_X] = { .core_note_type = NT_PRSTATUS, @@ -179,6 +252,16 @@ static const struct user_regset riscv_user_regset[] = { .set = riscv_vr_set, }, #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI + [REGSET_CFI] = { + .core_note_type = NT_RISCV_USER_CFI, + .align = sizeof(__u64), + .n = sizeof(struct user_cfi_state) / sizeof(__u64), + .size = sizeof(__u64), + .regset_get = riscv_cfi_get, + .set = riscv_cfi_set, + } +#endif }; static const struct user_regset_view riscv_user_native_view = { diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/elf.h b/include/uapi/linux/elf.h index 9417309b7230..f60b2de66b1c 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/elf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/elf.h @@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ typedef struct elf64_shdr { #define NT_MIPS_MSA 0x802 /* MIPS SIMD registers */ #define NT_RISCV_CSR 0x900 /* RISC-V Control and Status Registers */ #define NT_RISCV_VECTOR 0x901 /* RISC-V vector registers */ +#define NT_RISCV_USER_CFI 0x902 /* RISC-V shadow stack state */ #define NT_LOONGARCH_CPUCFG 0xa00 /* LoongArch CPU config registers */ #define NT_LOONGARCH_CSR 0xa01 /* LoongArch control and status registers */ #define NT_LOONGARCH_LSX 0xa02 /* LoongArch Loongson SIMD Extension registers */