| Message ID | 20231110200830.1832556-3-davidgow@google.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | a08d4d6284393d44ef4e076288c31d04fc469a58 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/3] kunit: Add a macro to wrap a deferred action function | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock.c index 63ca46f4cb35..becb3dbaa548 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock.c @@ -153,12 +153,9 @@ static int __build_mock(struct kunit *test, struct drm_device *drm, return 0; } -static void kunit_action_drm_dev_unregister(void *ptr) -{ - struct drm_device *drm = ptr; - - drm_dev_unregister(drm); -} +KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER(kunit_action_drm_dev_unregister, + drm_dev_unregister, + struct drm_device *); static struct vc4_dev *__mock_device(struct kunit *test, bool is_vc5) {
In order to pass functions to kunit_add_action(), they need to be of the kunit_action_t type. While casting the function pointer can work, it will break control-flow integrity. vc4_mock already defines such a wrapper for drm_dev_unregister(), but it involves less boilerplate to use the new macro, so replace the manual implementation. Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> --- This patch should be a no-op, just moving to use a standard macro to implement these wrappers rather than hand-coding them. Let me know if you'd prefer to take these in separately via the drm trees, or if you're okay with having this whole series go via kselftest/kunit. Cheers, -- David --- drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)