From patchwork Wed Sep 27 09:03:47 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 727500 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8040DE810A8 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 09:04:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230271AbjI0JEx (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2023 05:04:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38454 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229531AbjI0JEw (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2023 05:04:52 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 313CFA3 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 02:04:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4RwVwq4bCJzrT2y; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 17:02:03 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.90.53.73) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 17:04:18 +0800 From: Jinjie Ruan To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] kunit: Fix missed memory release in kunit_free_suite_set() Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 17:03:47 +0800 Message-ID: <20230927090350.1220972-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20230927090350.1220972-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20230927090350.1220972-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.90.53.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org modprobe cpumask_kunit and rmmod cpumask_kunit, kmemleak detect a suspected memory leak as below. If kunit_filter_suites() in kunit_module_init() succeeds, the suite_set.start will not be NULL and the kunit_free_suite_set() in kunit_module_exit() should free all the memory which has not been freed. However the test_cases in suites is left out. unreferenced object 0xffff54ac47e83200 (size 512): comm "modprobe", pid 592, jiffies 4294913238 (age 1367.612s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 84 13 1a f0 d3 b6 ff ff 30 68 1a f0 d3 b6 ff ff ........0h...... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<000000008dec63a2>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368 [<00000000ec280d8e>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290 [<00000000896c7740>] __kmalloc+0x60/0x2c0 [<000000007a50fa06>] kunit_filter_suites+0x254/0x5b8 [<0000000078cc98e2>] kunit_module_notify+0xf4/0x240 [<0000000033cea952>] notifier_call_chain+0x98/0x17c [<00000000973d05cc>] notifier_call_chain_robust+0x4c/0xa4 [<000000005f95895f>] blocking_notifier_call_chain_robust+0x4c/0x74 [<0000000048e36fa7>] load_module+0x1a2c/0x1c40 [<0000000004eb8a91>] init_module_from_file+0x94/0xcc [<0000000037dbba28>] idempotent_init_module+0x184/0x278 [<00000000161b75cb>] __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x68/0xa8 [<000000006dc1669b>] invoke_syscall+0x44/0x100 [<00000000fa87e304>] el0_svc_common.constprop.1+0x68/0xe0 [<000000009d8ad866>] do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 [<000000005b83c607>] el0_svc+0x3c/0xc4 Fixes: a127b154a8f2 ("kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Rae Moar Reviewed-by: David Gow --- v4: - Correct the fix tag. - Add Reviewed-by. v2: - Add Reviewed-by. --- lib/kunit/executor.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index a6348489d45f..a037a46fae5e 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -137,8 +137,10 @@ void kunit_free_suite_set(struct kunit_suite_set suite_set) { struct kunit_suite * const *suites; - for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++) + for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++) { + kfree((*suites)->test_cases); kfree(*suites); + } kfree(suite_set.start); }