From patchwork Sat Sep 23 01:31:44 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suren Baghdasaryan X-Patchwork-Id: 725961 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694F3CE7A88 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 01:32:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231164AbjIWBcK (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2023 21:32:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35174 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231132AbjIWBcB (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2023 21:32:01 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-x114a.google.com (mail-yw1-x114a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::114a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54D48E8 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 18:31:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-x114a.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-5924b2aac52so48079007b3.2 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 18:31:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1695432714; x=1696037514; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CmlRLzvRmqHtTQ7XfVaULJQdpUmF9g0LEd2VGVtMlKs=; b=G8owUdPznKVfLY45n4FQwwFNCPmcO1hv0oASRh5iwzDGrKQUSW0/GCJ665iIBhlwKK D8lQHxHOLRlGSHKaQgVPxw1U+crg7KdZ4UhMJR5n8G9zTuPet62f3XnykrnpPZe3wIj+ aD077xa/f0N1AxbxBY00jXiOB6mADwPkCBaF1csm95Gi9eeLwQSg5k7oRN8ujBSy7IWP TAYyeMwI1Xw20t9oXEJ7zm1y5PpVNwknrcepH+ZZpWtrUn0IQWNzjc+y50vheI/imNtn zqe1waeQAanWmFpFCkZrOplL65HipkM8KgGrRkOZKyAxE/hUFVyuQmtCP1LV5fQSwkCN O88A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1695432714; x=1696037514; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CmlRLzvRmqHtTQ7XfVaULJQdpUmF9g0LEd2VGVtMlKs=; b=Sj1dzlBTbnCPPiogehCqH8YRdTzzAxcwkZQHNS9SBjU/GcaxsCiaIcaKqup+CXFVlL W7Nb4TsS+MbT6hMmB4/Vh9GFpml0Hzdr/BhE5atbfeDyBUqDF+izzzzmuCcoMuivi7L5 nRm5ug0TzmLer9ZROTiEOu4cForSJbI7vqFogkVDZzdgWXII6dGRzcco5Y5mCsvlhCoc neSXs3nAsXwrafOHZTCSfCebnSn0suWxjVdJH55K2ulVdUBLBfDcczKN/kbQcdaQf4gu +gkmuv5xOpL3x5Wx8lZsZyAjchQNKm9kzQtqYleCVhwKn7KP4havsZXSthJwJ8XbvbmV z6RA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw5GYdwZX1hJfJn1p/0yrq3M6HcNwzgAwA09DA8xwT+bM8sZWft Tf6ivWuyrp/+drXOO9SCIEXDZmCaDHo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHrox59qxxuPIk8Ga14hkjCpjYszzofG63cVT9NaC90L+xjL83ej6dG0sFL+ZY5m2NWMQmGlw9XCjA= X-Received: from surenb-desktop.mtv.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:211:201:3398:6644:ed7f:bec9]) (user=surenb job=sendgmr) by 2002:a25:cb0f:0:b0:d7f:2cb6:7d8c with SMTP id b15-20020a25cb0f000000b00d7f2cb67d8cmr11540ybg.13.1695432714541; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 18:31:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 18:31:44 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20230923013148.1390521-1-surenb@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20230923013148.1390521-1-surenb@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0.515.g380fc7ccd1-goog Message-ID: <20230923013148.1390521-2-surenb@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] userfaultfd: UFFDIO_REMAP: rmap preparation From: Suren Baghdasaryan To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, aarcange@redhat.com, lokeshgidra@google.com, peterx@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, hughd@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, axelrasmussen@google.com, rppt@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, jannh@google.com, zhangpeng362@huawei.com, bgeffon@google.com, kaleshsingh@google.com, ngeoffray@google.com, jdduke@google.com, surenb@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org From: Andrea Arcangeli As far as the rmap code is concerned, UFFDIO_REMAP only alters the page->mapping and page->index. It does it while holding the page lock. However folio_referenced() is doing rmap walks without taking the folio lock first, so folio_lock_anon_vma_read() must be updated to re-check that the folio->mapping didn't change after we obtained the anon_vma read lock. UFFDIO_REMAP takes the anon_vma lock for writing before altering the folio->mapping, so if the folio->mapping is still the same after obtaining the anon_vma read lock (without the folio lock), the rmap walks can go ahead safely (and UFFDIO_REMAP will wait the rmap walk to complete before proceeding). UFFDIO_REMAP serializes against itself with the folio lock. All other places taking the anon_vma lock while holding the mmap_lock for writing, don't need to check if the folio->mapping has changed after taking the anon_vma lock, regardless of the folio lock, because UFFDIO_REMAP holds the mmap_lock for reading. There's one constraint enforced to allow this simplification: the source pages passed to UFFDIO_REMAP must be mapped only in one vma, but this constraint is an acceptable tradeoff for UFFDIO_REMAP users. The source addresses passed to UFFDIO_REMAP can be set as VM_DONTCOPY with MADV_DONTFORK to avoid any risk of the mapcount of the pages increasing if some thread of the process forks() before UFFDIO_REMAP run. Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan --- mm/rmap.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c index ec7f8e6c9e48..c1ebbd23fa61 100644 --- a/mm/rmap.c +++ b/mm/rmap.c @@ -542,6 +542,7 @@ struct anon_vma *folio_lock_anon_vma_read(struct folio *folio, struct anon_vma *root_anon_vma; unsigned long anon_mapping; +repeat: rcu_read_lock(); anon_mapping = (unsigned long)READ_ONCE(folio->mapping); if ((anon_mapping & PAGE_MAPPING_FLAGS) != PAGE_MAPPING_ANON) @@ -586,6 +587,18 @@ struct anon_vma *folio_lock_anon_vma_read(struct folio *folio, rcu_read_unlock(); anon_vma_lock_read(anon_vma); + /* + * Check if UFFDIO_REMAP changed the anon_vma. This is needed + * because we don't assume the folio was locked. + */ + if (unlikely((unsigned long) READ_ONCE(folio->mapping) != + anon_mapping)) { + anon_vma_unlock_read(anon_vma); + put_anon_vma(anon_vma); + anon_vma = NULL; + goto repeat; + } + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&anon_vma->refcount)) { /* * Oops, we held the last refcount, release the lock