From patchwork Sat Jun 24 10:30:46 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Thomas_Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= X-Patchwork-Id: 696078 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF41C001B0 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 10:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232999AbjFXKbI (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jun 2023 06:31:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37694 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232879AbjFXKbG (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jun 2023 06:31:06 -0400 Received: from todd.t-8ch.de (todd.t-8ch.de [159.69.126.157]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BAE710F5; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 03:31:05 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?q?Thomas_Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=weissschuh.net; s=mail; t=1687602663; bh=hzizDE0ofd3T5vSSD4XlksVV4PJv55T5z7/2M1lRIzg=; h=From:Date:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=s736ziZIOYjSRE+ah/C5l268BQPA45kdL1qrax+pxBfF+O7My/Q6C+a14kXoky8vd YD0T5fapsmdqU7/11Y2mxLLX8GEhHfH0afuNV9akfrNn7cs69o9wmwfopXqDBOuSmm 5N0JpQv4GcnWJyxfOmMl/njB2v8Q++EXPaz9O8XA= Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 12:30:46 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] selftests/nolibc: drop test chmod_net MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20230624-proc-net-setattr-v1-1-73176812adee@weissschuh.net> References: <20230624-proc-net-setattr-v1-0-73176812adee@weissschuh.net> In-Reply-To: <20230624-proc-net-setattr-v1-0-73176812adee@weissschuh.net> To: Willy Tarreau , Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Zhangjin Wu , Arnd Bergmann , =?utf-8?q?Thomas_Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= X-Mailer: b4 0.12.2 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; t=1687602663; l=1385; i=linux@weissschuh.net; s=20221212; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=hzizDE0ofd3T5vSSD4XlksVV4PJv55T5z7/2M1lRIzg=; b=DF/vX9Kb4oDrP3HJyxHWbLrQCz+jWOTPWYigChKBgenfVT0teCpk23ZpjtVERScZTkb2ojuco R0JddflQm3cANkMb6S0BW1K7oDY/9Vp863E3rP4pbXqXGkRt2TgfmL1 X-Developer-Key: i=linux@weissschuh.net; a=ed25519; pk=KcycQgFPX2wGR5azS7RhpBqedglOZVgRPfdFSPB1LNw= Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org The test relies on /proc/$PID/net to allow chmod() operations. It is the only file or directory in /proc/$PID/ to allow this and a bug. That bug will be fixed in the next patch in the series and therefore the test would start failing. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/d0d111ef-edae-4760-83fb-36db84278da1@t-8ch.de/ Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh --- tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c index 21bacc928bf7..7e649814a241 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c @@ -512,7 +512,6 @@ int run_syscall(int min, int max) CASE_TEST(chdir_root); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, chdir("/")); break; CASE_TEST(chdir_dot); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, chdir(".")); break; CASE_TEST(chdir_blah); EXPECT_SYSER(1, chdir("/blah"), -1, ENOENT); break; - CASE_TEST(chmod_net); EXPECT_SYSZR(proc, chmod("/proc/self/net", 0555)); break; CASE_TEST(chmod_self); EXPECT_SYSER(proc, chmod("/proc/self", 0555), -1, EPERM); break; CASE_TEST(chown_self); EXPECT_SYSER(proc, chown("/proc/self", 0, 0), -1, EPERM); break; CASE_TEST(chroot_root); EXPECT_SYSZR(euid0, chroot("/")); break;