Message ID | 20241022054810.23369-1-manali.shukla@amd.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add support for the Idle HLT intercept feature | expand |
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 05:48:07AM +0000, Manali Shukla wrote: > From: Manali Shukla <Manali.Shukla@amd.com> > > The Idle HLT Intercept feature allows for the HLT instruction > execution by a vCPU to be intercepted by the hypervisor only if there > are no pending events (V_INTR and V_NMI) for the vCPU. When the vCPU > is expected to service the pending events (V_INTR and V_NMI), the Idle > HLT intercept won’t trigger. The feature allows the hypervisor to > determine if the vCPU is idle and reduces wasteful VMEXITs. > > In addition to the aforementioned use case, the Idle HLT intercept > feature is also used for enlightened guests who aim to securely manage > events without the hypervisor’s awareness. If a HLT occurs while > a virtual event is pending and the hypervisor is unaware of this > pending event (as could be the case with enlightened guests), the > absence of the Idle HLT intercept feature could result in a vCPU being > suspended indefinitely. > > Presence of Idle HLT intercept feature for guests is indicated via CPUID > function 0x8000000A_EDX[30]. > > Signed-off-by: Manali Shukla <Manali.Shukla@amd.com> > Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h > index dd4682857c12..7461a49e1045 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h > @@ -382,6 +382,7 @@ > #define X86_FEATURE_V_SPEC_CTRL (15*32+20) /* "v_spec_ctrl" Virtual SPEC_CTRL */ > #define X86_FEATURE_VNMI (15*32+25) /* "vnmi" Virtual NMI */ > #define X86_FEATURE_SVME_ADDR_CHK (15*32+28) /* SVME addr check */ > +#define X86_FEATURE_IDLE_HLT (15*32+30) /* "" IDLE HLT intercept */ Whoever commits this, you can remove the "" in the comment now as they're not needed anymore. Thx.
On 11/28/2024 8:39 PM, Manali Shukla wrote: > On 10/22/2024 11:18 AM, Manali Shukla wrote: >> The upcoming new Idle HLT Intercept feature allows for the HLT >> instruction execution by a vCPU to be intercepted by the hypervisor >> only if there are no pending V_INTR and V_NMI events for the vCPU. >> When the vCPU is expected to service the pending V_INTR and V_NMI >> events, the Idle HLT intercept won’t trigger. The feature allows the >> hypervisor to determine if the vCPU is actually idle and reduces >> wasteful VMEXITs. >> >> The idle HLT intercept feature is used for enlightened guests who wish >> to securely handle the events. When an enlightened guest does a HLT >> while an interrupt is pending, hypervisor will not have a way to >> figure out whether the guest needs to be re-entered or not. The Idle >> HLT intercept feature allows the HLT execution only if there are no >> pending V_INTR and V_NMI events. >> >> Presence of the Idle HLT Intercept feature is indicated via CPUID >> function Fn8000_000A_EDX[30]. >> >> Document for the Idle HLT intercept feature is available at [1]. >> >> This series is based on kvm-next/next (64dbb3a771a1) + [2]. >> >> Experiments done: >> ---------------- >> >> kvm_amd.avic is set to '0' for this experiment. >> >> The below numbers represent the average of 10 runs. >> >> Normal guest (L1) >> The below netperf command was run on the guest with smp = 1 (pinned). >> >> netperf -H <host ip> -t TCP_RR -l 60 >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> |with Idle HLT(transactions/Sec)|w/o Idle HLT(transactions/Sec)| >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> | 25645.7136 | 25773.2796 | >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Number of transactions/sec with and without idle HLT intercept feature >> are almost same. >> >> Nested guest (L2) >> The below netperf command was run on L2 guest with smp = 1 (pinned). >> >> netperf -H <host ip> -t TCP_RR -l 60 >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> |with Idle HLT(transactions/Sec)|w/o Idle HLT(transactions/Sec)| >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> | 5655.4468 | 5755.2189 | >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Number of transactions/sec with and without idle HLT intercept feature >> are almost same. >> >> Testing Done: >> - Tested the functionality for the Idle HLT intercept feature >> using selftest svm_idle_hlt_test. >> - Tested SEV and SEV-ES guest for the Idle HLT intercept functionality. >> - Tested the Idle HLT intercept functionality on nested guest. >> >> v3 -> v4 >> - Drop the patches to add vcpu_get_stat() into a new series [2]. >> - Added nested Idle HLT intercept support. >> >> v2 -> v3 >> - Incorporated Andrew's suggestion to structure vcpu_stat_types in >> a way that each architecture can share the generic types and also >> provide its own. >> >> v1 -> v2 >> - Done changes in svm_idle_hlt_test based on the review comments from Sean. >> - Added an enum based approach to get binary stats in vcpu_get_stat() which >> doesn't use string to get stat data based on the comments from Sean. >> - Added self_halt() and cli() helpers based on the comments from Sean. >> >> [1]: AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Pub. 24593, April 2024, >> Vol 2, 15.9 Instruction Intercepts (Table 15-7: IDLE_HLT). >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306250 >> >> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20241021062226.108657-1-manali.shukla@amd.com/T/#t >> >> Manali Shukla (4): >> x86/cpufeatures: Add CPUID feature bit for Idle HLT intercept >> KVM: SVM: Add Idle HLT intercept support >> KVM: nSVM: implement the nested idle halt intercept >> KVM: selftests: KVM: SVM: Add Idle HLT intercept test >> >> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 + >> arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h | 1 + >> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h | 2 + >> arch/x86/kvm/governed_features.h | 1 + >> arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 7 ++ >> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 15 +++- >> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 + >> .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h | 1 + >> .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_idle_hlt_test.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 9 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_idle_hlt_test.c >> >> >> base-commit: c8d430db8eec7d4fd13a6bea27b7086a54eda6da >> prerequisite-patch-id: ca912571db5c004f77b70843b8dd35517ff1267f >> prerequisite-patch-id: 164ea3b4346f9e04bc69819278d20f5e1b5df5ed >> prerequisite-patch-id: 90d870f426ebc2cec43c0dd89b701ee998385455 >> prerequisite-patch-id: 45812b799c517a4521782a1fdbcda881237e1eda > > A gentle reminder. > > -Manali A Gentle reminder. -Manali
On 12/12/2024 10:07 PM, Manali Shukla wrote: > On 11/28/2024 8:39 PM, Manali Shukla wrote: >> On 10/22/2024 11:18 AM, Manali Shukla wrote: >>> The upcoming new Idle HLT Intercept feature allows for the HLT >>> instruction execution by a vCPU to be intercepted by the hypervisor >>> only if there are no pending V_INTR and V_NMI events for the vCPU. >>> When the vCPU is expected to service the pending V_INTR and V_NMI >>> events, the Idle HLT intercept won’t trigger. The feature allows the >>> hypervisor to determine if the vCPU is actually idle and reduces >>> wasteful VMEXITs. >>> >>> The idle HLT intercept feature is used for enlightened guests who wish >>> to securely handle the events. When an enlightened guest does a HLT >>> while an interrupt is pending, hypervisor will not have a way to >>> figure out whether the guest needs to be re-entered or not. The Idle >>> HLT intercept feature allows the HLT execution only if there are no >>> pending V_INTR and V_NMI events. >>> >>> Presence of the Idle HLT Intercept feature is indicated via CPUID >>> function Fn8000_000A_EDX[30]. >>> >>> Document for the Idle HLT intercept feature is available at [1]. >>> >>> This series is based on kvm-next/next (64dbb3a771a1) + [2]. >>> >>> Experiments done: >>> ---------------- >>> >>> kvm_amd.avic is set to '0' for this experiment. >>> >>> The below numbers represent the average of 10 runs. >>> >>> Normal guest (L1) >>> The below netperf command was run on the guest with smp = 1 (pinned). >>> >>> netperf -H <host ip> -t TCP_RR -l 60 >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> |with Idle HLT(transactions/Sec)|w/o Idle HLT(transactions/Sec)| >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> | 25645.7136 | 25773.2796 | >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Number of transactions/sec with and without idle HLT intercept feature >>> are almost same. >>> >>> Nested guest (L2) >>> The below netperf command was run on L2 guest with smp = 1 (pinned). >>> >>> netperf -H <host ip> -t TCP_RR -l 60 >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> |with Idle HLT(transactions/Sec)|w/o Idle HLT(transactions/Sec)| >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> | 5655.4468 | 5755.2189 | >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Number of transactions/sec with and without idle HLT intercept feature >>> are almost same. >>> >>> Testing Done: >>> - Tested the functionality for the Idle HLT intercept feature >>> using selftest svm_idle_hlt_test. >>> - Tested SEV and SEV-ES guest for the Idle HLT intercept functionality. >>> - Tested the Idle HLT intercept functionality on nested guest. >>> >>> v3 -> v4 >>> - Drop the patches to add vcpu_get_stat() into a new series [2]. >>> - Added nested Idle HLT intercept support. >>> >>> v2 -> v3 >>> - Incorporated Andrew's suggestion to structure vcpu_stat_types in >>> a way that each architecture can share the generic types and also >>> provide its own. >>> >>> v1 -> v2 >>> - Done changes in svm_idle_hlt_test based on the review comments from Sean. >>> - Added an enum based approach to get binary stats in vcpu_get_stat() which >>> doesn't use string to get stat data based on the comments from Sean. >>> - Added self_halt() and cli() helpers based on the comments from Sean. >>> >>> [1]: AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Pub. 24593, April 2024, >>> Vol 2, 15.9 Instruction Intercepts (Table 15-7: IDLE_HLT). >>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306250 >>> >>> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20241021062226.108657-1-manali.shukla@amd.com/T/#t >>> >>> Manali Shukla (4): >>> x86/cpufeatures: Add CPUID feature bit for Idle HLT intercept >>> KVM: SVM: Add Idle HLT intercept support >>> KVM: nSVM: implement the nested idle halt intercept >>> KVM: selftests: KVM: SVM: Add Idle HLT intercept test >>> >>> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 + >>> arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h | 1 + >>> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h | 2 + >>> arch/x86/kvm/governed_features.h | 1 + >>> arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 7 ++ >>> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 15 +++- >>> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 + >>> .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h | 1 + >>> .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_idle_hlt_test.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> 9 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_idle_hlt_test.c >>> >>> >>> base-commit: c8d430db8eec7d4fd13a6bea27b7086a54eda6da >>> prerequisite-patch-id: ca912571db5c004f77b70843b8dd35517ff1267f >>> prerequisite-patch-id: 164ea3b4346f9e04bc69819278d20f5e1b5df5ed >>> prerequisite-patch-id: 90d870f426ebc2cec43c0dd89b701ee998385455 >>> prerequisite-patch-id: 45812b799c517a4521782a1fdbcda881237e1eda >> >> A gentle reminder. >> >> -Manali > > A Gentle reminder. > > -Manali > A Gentle reminder. -Manali
On 12/23/2024 2:43 PM, Manali Shukla wrote: > On 12/12/2024 10:07 PM, Manali Shukla wrote: >> On 11/28/2024 8:39 PM, Manali Shukla wrote: >>> On 10/22/2024 11:18 AM, Manali Shukla wrote: >>>> The upcoming new Idle HLT Intercept feature allows for the HLT >>>> instruction execution by a vCPU to be intercepted by the hypervisor >>>> only if there are no pending V_INTR and V_NMI events for the vCPU. >>>> When the vCPU is expected to service the pending V_INTR and V_NMI >>>> events, the Idle HLT intercept won’t trigger. The feature allows the >>>> hypervisor to determine if the vCPU is actually idle and reduces >>>> wasteful VMEXITs. >>>> >>>> The idle HLT intercept feature is used for enlightened guests who wish >>>> to securely handle the events. When an enlightened guest does a HLT >>>> while an interrupt is pending, hypervisor will not have a way to >>>> figure out whether the guest needs to be re-entered or not. The Idle >>>> HLT intercept feature allows the HLT execution only if there are no >>>> pending V_INTR and V_NMI events. >>>> >>>> Presence of the Idle HLT Intercept feature is indicated via CPUID >>>> function Fn8000_000A_EDX[30]. >>>> >>>> Document for the Idle HLT intercept feature is available at [1]. >>>> >>>> This series is based on kvm-next/next (64dbb3a771a1) + [2]. >>>> >>>> Experiments done: >>>> ---------------- >>>> >>>> kvm_amd.avic is set to '0' for this experiment. >>>> >>>> The below numbers represent the average of 10 runs. >>>> >>>> Normal guest (L1) >>>> The below netperf command was run on the guest with smp = 1 (pinned). >>>> >>>> netperf -H <host ip> -t TCP_RR -l 60 >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> |with Idle HLT(transactions/Sec)|w/o Idle HLT(transactions/Sec)| >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> | 25645.7136 | 25773.2796 | >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Number of transactions/sec with and without idle HLT intercept feature >>>> are almost same. >>>> >>>> Nested guest (L2) >>>> The below netperf command was run on L2 guest with smp = 1 (pinned). >>>> >>>> netperf -H <host ip> -t TCP_RR -l 60 >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> |with Idle HLT(transactions/Sec)|w/o Idle HLT(transactions/Sec)| >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> | 5655.4468 | 5755.2189 | >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Number of transactions/sec with and without idle HLT intercept feature >>>> are almost same. >>>> >>>> Testing Done: >>>> - Tested the functionality for the Idle HLT intercept feature >>>> using selftest svm_idle_hlt_test. >>>> - Tested SEV and SEV-ES guest for the Idle HLT intercept functionality. >>>> - Tested the Idle HLT intercept functionality on nested guest. >>>> >>>> v3 -> v4 >>>> - Drop the patches to add vcpu_get_stat() into a new series [2]. >>>> - Added nested Idle HLT intercept support. >>>> >>>> v2 -> v3 >>>> - Incorporated Andrew's suggestion to structure vcpu_stat_types in >>>> a way that each architecture can share the generic types and also >>>> provide its own. >>>> >>>> v1 -> v2 >>>> - Done changes in svm_idle_hlt_test based on the review comments from Sean. >>>> - Added an enum based approach to get binary stats in vcpu_get_stat() which >>>> doesn't use string to get stat data based on the comments from Sean. >>>> - Added self_halt() and cli() helpers based on the comments from Sean. >>>> >>>> [1]: AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Pub. 24593, April 2024, >>>> Vol 2, 15.9 Instruction Intercepts (Table 15-7: IDLE_HLT). >>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306250 >>>> >>>> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20241021062226.108657-1-manali.shukla@amd.com/T/#t >>>> >>>> Manali Shukla (4): >>>> x86/cpufeatures: Add CPUID feature bit for Idle HLT intercept >>>> KVM: SVM: Add Idle HLT intercept support >>>> KVM: nSVM: implement the nested idle halt intercept >>>> KVM: selftests: KVM: SVM: Add Idle HLT intercept test >>>> >>>> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 + >>>> arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h | 1 + >>>> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h | 2 + >>>> arch/x86/kvm/governed_features.h | 1 + >>>> arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 7 ++ >>>> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 15 +++- >>>> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 + >>>> .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h | 1 + >>>> .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_idle_hlt_test.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 9 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_idle_hlt_test.c >>>> >>>> >>>> base-commit: c8d430db8eec7d4fd13a6bea27b7086a54eda6da >>>> prerequisite-patch-id: ca912571db5c004f77b70843b8dd35517ff1267f >>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 164ea3b4346f9e04bc69819278d20f5e1b5df5ed >>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 90d870f426ebc2cec43c0dd89b701ee998385455 >>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 45812b799c517a4521782a1fdbcda881237e1eda >>> >>> A gentle reminder. >>> >>> -Manali >> >> A Gentle reminder. >> >> -Manali >> > > A Gentle reminder. > > -Manali Sorry. I just realized that you have already reviewed the patches. Please ignore the reminder. - Manali