mbox series

[v10,0/2] SPDX: add copyleft-next-0.3.1

Message ID 20220914060147.1934064-1-mcgrof@kernel.org
Headers show
Series SPDX: add copyleft-next-0.3.1 | expand

Message

Luis Chamberlain Sept. 14, 2022, 6:01 a.m. UTC 
As suggested by Thomas Gleixner, I'm following up to move on with
the SPDX tag needed for copyleft-next-0.3.1. I've split this out
from the test_sysfs selftest so to separate review from that.

Changes on this v10:

  o embraced paragraph from Thomas Gleixner which helps explain why             
    the OR operator in the SPDX license name
  o dropped the GPL-2.0 and GPL-2.0+ tags as suggested by Thomas Gleixner
    as these are outdated (still valid) in the SPDX spec
  o trimmed the Cc list to remove the test_sysfs / block layer / fs folks as
    the test_sysfs stuff is now dropped from consideration in this series

The last series was at v9 but it also had the test_sysfs and its
changes, its history can be found here:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211029184500.2821444-1-mcgrof@kernel.org/

Luis Chamberlain (2):
  LICENSES: Add the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license
  testing: use the copyleft-next-0.3.1 SPDX tag

 LICENSES/dual/copyleft-next-0.3.1        | 236 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 lib/test_kmod.c                          |  12 +-
 lib/test_sysctl.c                        |  12 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh     |  13 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh |  12 +-
 5 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 LICENSES/dual/copyleft-next-0.3.1

Comments

Luis Chamberlain Sept. 30, 2022, 8:06 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:01:45PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> As suggested by Thomas Gleixner, I'm following up to move on with
> the SPDX tag needed for copyleft-next-0.3.1. I've split this out
> from the test_sysfs selftest so to separate review from that.
> 
> Changes on this v10:
> 
>   o embraced paragraph from Thomas Gleixner which helps explain why             
>     the OR operator in the SPDX license name
>   o dropped the GPL-2.0 and GPL-2.0+ tags as suggested by Thomas Gleixner
>     as these are outdated (still valid) in the SPDX spec
>   o trimmed the Cc list to remove the test_sysfs / block layer / fs folks as
>     the test_sysfs stuff is now dropped from consideration in this series
> 
> The last series was at v9 but it also had the test_sysfs and its
> changes, its history can be found here:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211029184500.2821444-1-mcgrof@kernel.org/
> 
> Luis Chamberlain (2):
>   LICENSES: Add the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license
>   testing: use the copyleft-next-0.3.1 SPDX tag

*poke*

  Luis
Greg Kroah-Hartman Oct. 1, 2022, 7:09 a.m. UTC | #2 
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 01:06:50PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:01:45PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > As suggested by Thomas Gleixner, I'm following up to move on with
> > the SPDX tag needed for copyleft-next-0.3.1. I've split this out
> > from the test_sysfs selftest so to separate review from that.
> > 
> > Changes on this v10:
> > 
> >   o embraced paragraph from Thomas Gleixner which helps explain why             
> >     the OR operator in the SPDX license name
> >   o dropped the GPL-2.0 and GPL-2.0+ tags as suggested by Thomas Gleixner
> >     as these are outdated (still valid) in the SPDX spec
> >   o trimmed the Cc list to remove the test_sysfs / block layer / fs folks as
> >     the test_sysfs stuff is now dropped from consideration in this series
> > 
> > The last series was at v9 but it also had the test_sysfs and its
> > changes, its history can be found here:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211029184500.2821444-1-mcgrof@kernel.org/
> > 
> > Luis Chamberlain (2):
> >   LICENSES: Add the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license
> >   testing: use the copyleft-next-0.3.1 SPDX tag
> 
> *poke*

I was waiting for someone else to review this before considering it...