| Message ID | 20220525154442.1438081-1-dlatypov@google.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | kunit: more assertion reworking | expand |
Hi Daniel, On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:44 PM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> wrote: > > Note: this does change the function signature of > kunit_do_failed_assertion, so we'd need to update the rust wrapper in https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/blob/rust/rust/kernel/kunit.rs > But otherwise, I don't think this series changes anything on the > rust-side. Thanks for the heads up! I can take care of that. Cheers, Miguel
This is a follow up to these three series: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220113165931.451305-1-dlatypov@google.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220118223506.1701553-1-dlatypov@google.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220125210011.3817742-1-dlatypov@google.com/ The two goals of those series were a) reduce the size of struct kunit_assert and friends. (struct kunit_assert went from 48 => 8 bytes on UML.) b) simplify the internal code, mostly by deleting macros This series goes further a) sizeof(struct kunit_assert) = 0 now b) e.g. we delete another class of macros (KUNIT_INIT_*_ASSERT_STRUCT) Note: this does change the function signature of kunit_do_failed_assertion, so we'd need to update the rust wrapper in https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/blob/rust/rust/kernel/kunit.rs But otherwise, I don't think this series changes anything on the rust-side. Daniel Latypov (4): rfc: kunit: remove format func from struct kunit_assert, get it to 0 bytes rfc: kunit: rename base KUNIT_ASSERTION macro to _KUNIT_FAILED rfc: kunit: eliminate KUNIT_INIT_*_ASSERT_STRUCT macros kunit: delcare kunit_assert structs as const include/kunit/assert.h | 74 ++----------------------- include/kunit/test.h | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- lib/kunit/test.c | 7 ++- 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-) base-commit: e7eaffce47b7db72b077630dbe836f0c4132496d