From patchwork Fri Sep 2 13:29:16 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Benjamin Tissoires X-Patchwork-Id: 602294 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07849ECAAD5 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 14:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238773AbiIBOFQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2022 10:05:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54550 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238774AbiIBOEb (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2022 10:04:31 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 613E7148D1D for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 06:33:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1662125583; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=46mxyRINAwXH1hQbHvRS6x0ECDUnr04nQdzD2pI2obU=; b=DDWmtWoUOVK9SI2CSz0sM9VObU83xODnmcbA0QOn33YwNXuyI/phPvX2H60B0ztKQzG3Os Ep80DNP/rm+7Umo53IamHH2ukRRWEWR6lgip5lfRBnt0OYyRzEuKQlen5O8jwKMl7YXies mp7RHkCvV+nFpLnwBUhLdh2SxRs/l1g= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-199-DAMr-CBTN7ePSwB02vo_dQ-1; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 09:29:49 -0400 X-MC-Unique: DAMr-CBTN7ePSwB02vo_dQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CABF18A64EB; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 13:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plouf.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.193.218]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3486D492C3B; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 13:29:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Benjamin Tissoires To: Greg KH , Jiri Kosina , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Shuah Khan , Dave Marchevsky , Joe Stringer , Jonathan Corbet Cc: Tero Kristo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Tissoires Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v10 01/23] selftests/bpf: regroup and declare similar kfuncs selftests in an array Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 15:29:16 +0200 Message-Id: <20220902132938.2409206-2-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20220902132938.2409206-1-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> References: <20220902132938.2409206-1-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.9 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-input@vger.kernel.org Similar to tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c: we declare an array of tests that we run one by one in a for loop. Followup patches will add more similar-ish tests, so avoid a lot of copy paste by grouping the declaration in an array. To be able to call bpf_object__find_program_by_name(), we need to use plain libbpf calls, and not light skeletons. So also change the Makefile to not generate light skeletons. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires --- new in v10 --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 2 +- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 56 +++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile index eecad99f1735..b19b0b35aec8 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ LINKED_SKELS := test_static_linked.skel.h linked_funcs.skel.h \ test_subskeleton.skel.h test_subskeleton_lib.skel.h \ test_usdt.skel.h -LSKELS := kfunc_call_test.c fentry_test.c fexit_test.c fexit_sleep.c \ +LSKELS := fentry_test.c fexit_test.c fexit_sleep.c \ test_ringbuf.c atomics.c trace_printk.c trace_vprintk.c \ map_ptr_kern.c core_kern.c core_kern_overflow.c # Generate both light skeleton and libbpf skeleton for these diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c index eede7c304f86..21e347f46c93 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c @@ -2,16 +2,28 @@ /* Copyright (c) 2021 Facebook */ #include #include -#include "kfunc_call_test.lskel.h" +#include "kfunc_call_test.skel.h" #include "kfunc_call_test_subprog.skel.h" #include "kfunc_call_test_subprog.lskel.h" #include "kfunc_call_destructive.skel.h" #include "cap_helpers.h" -static void test_main(void) +struct kfunc_test_params { + const char *prog_name; + int retval; +}; + +static struct kfunc_test_params kfunc_tests[] = { + {"kfunc_call_test1", 12}, + {"kfunc_call_test2", 3}, + {"kfunc_call_test_ref_btf_id", 0}, +}; + +static void verify_success(struct kfunc_test_params *param) { - struct kfunc_call_test_lskel *skel; + struct kfunc_call_test *skel; + struct bpf_program *prog; int prog_fd, err; LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts, .data_in = &pkt_v4, @@ -19,26 +31,35 @@ static void test_main(void) .repeat = 1, ); - skel = kfunc_call_test_lskel__open_and_load(); + skel = kfunc_call_test__open_and_load(); if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel")) return; - prog_fd = skel->progs.kfunc_call_test1.prog_fd; - err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts); - ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run(test1)"); - ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 12, "test1-retval"); + prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(skel->obj, param->prog_name); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "bpf_object__find_program_by_name")) + goto cleanup; - prog_fd = skel->progs.kfunc_call_test2.prog_fd; + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog); err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts); - ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run(test2)"); - ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 3, "test2-retval"); + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, param->prog_name)) + goto cleanup; - prog_fd = skel->progs.kfunc_call_test_ref_btf_id.prog_fd; - err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts); - ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run(test_ref_btf_id)"); - ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "test_ref_btf_id-retval"); + ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, param->retval, "retval"); + +cleanup: + kfunc_call_test__destroy(skel); +} + +static void test_main(void) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kfunc_tests); i++) { + if (!test__start_subtest(kfunc_tests[i].prog_name)) + continue; - kfunc_call_test_lskel__destroy(skel); + verify_success(&kfunc_tests[i]); + } } static void test_subprog(void) @@ -121,8 +142,7 @@ static void test_destructive(void) void test_kfunc_call(void) { - if (test__start_subtest("main")) - test_main(); + test_main(); if (test__start_subtest("subprog")) test_subprog();