From patchwork Sat Nov 5 21:11:42 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Michael Zaidman X-Patchwork-Id: 622775 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13042C433FE for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2022 21:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229971AbiKEVNJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Nov 2022 17:13:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55738 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230131AbiKEVMx (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Nov 2022 17:12:53 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com (mail-ej1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E81E1183C; Sat, 5 Nov 2022 14:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id d26so21297671eje.10; Sat, 05 Nov 2022 14:12:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ALhJBetIf5X/SyaoXHlGdZsad0OG/1yQx1wQzt9ePhk=; b=JVD+DIUGz7tcYWKpKFUiLGHd5GsgisugyiOu3/TQj1m/kih6cjyY4I0AFK75u5QDaY mKMAKa3VVEsRUfLaZVFTPw5vQWDO0TgeJsitgfg+7OAYO2Sj09b9SXHs50VfVg8RhGVG HKOhfdnqqaobWogzBQJ99RhU+nbvyiGgUP/yU8e+5drKbyqCCVgGrDApxvKlA2XHBntk lgczeCa7myP3Iy4H+Z7RBtF6Kdq1YYTCygJow+QgwTsBjGJOrk1qscSjX6Vue6TQZ3kf nIDzayF6yra+TnewrrwaO06KVROTk2ryXa/I5bhp2tVheLHW7xFHXe4WoRahgVp+2dlB P2jg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ALhJBetIf5X/SyaoXHlGdZsad0OG/1yQx1wQzt9ePhk=; b=wKKlTDYtN0sjyqhmN1aPzOsbp34ellDQJw2aJ7tml/uqC1GzmNsLPtJnsqa9o/oh8U K5sd3sQpzFN6ssnMCRXjC7QChNrzdmhPHBPdOWVVR2OQ7cEeB4VHbKBON4kRDHMGM9n2 TXBLaiwzFsSNgqCo7GxzLaKukf4DK71VCkIoHR1XlhOHvfc25DZv7fs2nqAnGI/GqGhJ ejliuqSt/YiYwfePoNTZ61kG6hB5AZB7IlA3MJX7f85QsTFgcdskx+ZymdGN1BPtEIjF Nst9M6LvPE8Jxqw9rrzm5G+BNi0JTtgPNy9mlAwEDOTT/LuW6iTMSJrnq6/zD1piF4q4 yNOg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1Ks20zsTzXXuE7GAh93SRy7loF1mIX6JMgHKLZYwdGrI1b6LON alc/FQD0GqTl9AgIxuI9bQA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4U3Oh2dbtyCVr8QUm0v7UkS75SXqRhWWHc+KQIG8z3FPgVlI/GVoayUxuttyDq+oZB2VEQUg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:728c:b0:78e:2856:7fed with SMTP id dt12-20020a170907728c00b0078e28567fedmr41268521ejc.2.1667682769440; Sat, 05 Nov 2022 14:12:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michael-VirtualBox.. (89-138-220-136.bb.netvision.net.il. [89.138.220.136]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ta19-20020a1709078c1300b0073d796a1043sm1323502ejc.123.2022.11.05.14.12.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 05 Nov 2022 14:12:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Zaidman To: jikos@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Enrik.Berkhan@inka.de, Michael Zaidman , Guillaume Champagne Subject: [PATCH v4 04/13] HID: ft260: support i2c reads greater than HID report size Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 23:11:42 +0200 Message-Id: <20221105211151.7094-5-michael.zaidman@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20221105211151.7094-1-michael.zaidman@gmail.com> References: <20221105211151.7094-1-michael.zaidman@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org A random i2c read operation in EEPROM devices is implemented as a dummy write operation, followed by a current address read operation. The dummy write operation is used to load the target byte or word address (a.k.a offset) into the offset counter, from which the subsequent read operation then reads. To support longer than one HID report size random read, the ft260 driver issues multiple pairs of i2c write offset + read data transactions of HID report size so that the EEPROM device sees many i2c random read requests from different offsets. Two issues with the current implementation: - This approach suffers from extra overhead caused by writing offset requests. - Necessity to handle offset per HID report in big-endian representation as EEPROM devices expect. The current implementation does not do it and correctly handles the reads up to 60 bytes only. This patch addresses both issues by implementing more efficient approach. It issues a single i2c read request of up to the EEPROM page size and then waits for the data to arrive in multiple HID reports. For example, to read the 256 bytes from a 24LC512 chip, which has 128 bytes page size, the old method performs six ft260_i2c_write_read transactions while the new - two only. Before: $ sudo ./i2cperf -d 2 -o 2 -s 128 -r 0-0xff 13 0x51 -S Read block via i2ctransfer by chunks ------------------------------------------------------------------- data rate(bps) efficiency(%) data size(B) total IOs IO size(B) ------------------------------------------------------------------- 40803 85 256 2 128 Kernel log of a single 128 bytes read request: [ +2.376308] ft260_i2c_write_read: read_off 0x0 left_len 128 len 60 [ +0.000002] ft260_i2c_write: rep 0xd0 addr 0x51 off 0 len 2 wlen 2 flag 0x2 d[0] 0x0 [ +0.000707] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x41, clock 100 [ +0.000173] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x40, clock 100 [ +0.000001] ft260_i2c_read: rep 0xc2 addr 0x51 len 60 [ +0.008660] ft260_raw_event: i2c resp: rep 0xde len 60 [ +0.000156] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x20, clock 100 [ +0.000001] ft260_i2c_write_read: read_off 0x3c left_len 68 len 60 [ +0.000001] ft260_i2c_write: rep 0xd0 addr 0x51 off 0 len 2 wlen 2 flag 0x2 d[0] 0x3c [ +0.001034] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x41, clock 100 [ +0.000191] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x40, clock 100 [ +0.000001] ft260_i2c_read: rep 0xc2 addr 0x51 len 60 [ +0.008614] ft260_raw_event: i2c resp: rep 0xde len 60 [ +0.000203] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x20, clock 100 [ +0.000001] ft260_i2c_write_read: read_off 0x78 left_len 8 len 8 [ +0.000001] ft260_i2c_write: rep 0xd0 addr 0x51 off 0 len 2 wlen 2 flag 0x2 d[0] 0x78 [ +0.000987] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x41, clock 100 [ +0.000192] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x40, clock 100 [ +0.000001] ft260_i2c_read: rep 0xc2 addr 0x51 len 8 [ +0.002614] ft260_raw_event: i2c resp: rep 0xd1 len 8 [ +0.000200] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x20, clock 100 After: $ sudo ./i2cperf -d 2 -o 2 -s 128 -r 0-0xff 13 0x51 -S Read block via i2ctransfer by chunks ------------------------------------------------------------------- data rate(bps) efficiency(%) data size(B) total IOs IO size(B) ------------------------------------------------------------------- 43990 85 256 2 128 Kernel log of a single 128 bytes read request: [ +1.464346] ft260_i2c_write_read: off 0x0 rlen 128 wlen 2 [ +0.000002] ft260_i2c_write: rep 0xd0 addr 0x51 off 0 len 2 wlen 2 flag 0x2 d[0] 0x0 [ +0.001653] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x41, clock 100 [ +0.000188] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x40, clock 100 [ +0.000002] ft260_i2c_read: rep 0xc2 addr 0x51 len 128 rlen 60 flag 0x3 [ +0.008609] ft260_raw_event: i2c resp: rep 0xde len 60 [ +0.000157] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x40, clock 100 [ +0.000002] ft260_i2c_read: rep 0xc2 addr 0x51 len 68 rlen 60 flag 0x0 [ +0.008840] ft260_raw_event: i2c resp: rep 0xde len 60 [ +0.000203] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x40, clock 100 [ +0.000002] ft260_i2c_read: rep 0xc2 addr 0x51 len 8 rlen 8 flag 0x4 [ +0.002794] ft260_raw_event: i2c resp: rep 0xd1 len 8 [ +0.000201] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x20, clock 100 Signed-off-by: Michael Zaidman Tested-by: Guillaume Champagne --- drivers/hid/hid-ft260.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-ft260.c b/drivers/hid/hid-ft260.c index cec83f69ebdc..a354089bb747 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-ft260.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-ft260.c @@ -456,49 +456,62 @@ static int ft260_smbus_write(struct ft260_device *dev, u8 addr, u8 cmd, static int ft260_i2c_read(struct ft260_device *dev, u8 addr, u8 *data, u16 len, u8 flag) { + u16 rd_len; + int timeout, ret; struct ft260_i2c_read_request_report rep; struct hid_device *hdev = dev->hdev; - int timeout; - int ret; - if (len > FT260_RD_DATA_MAX) { - hid_err(hdev, "%s: unsupported rd len: %d\n", __func__, len); - return -EINVAL; - } + if ((flag & FT260_FLAG_START_REPEATED) == FT260_FLAG_START_REPEATED) + flag = FT260_FLAG_START_REPEATED; + else + flag = FT260_FLAG_START; + do { + if (len <= FT260_RD_DATA_MAX) { + rd_len = len; + flag |= FT260_FLAG_STOP; + } else { + rd_len = FT260_RD_DATA_MAX; + } - dev->read_idx = 0; - dev->read_buf = data; - dev->read_len = len; + dev->read_idx = 0; + dev->read_buf = data; + dev->read_len = rd_len; - rep.report = FT260_I2C_READ_REQ; - rep.length = cpu_to_le16(len); - rep.address = addr; - rep.flag = flag; + rep.report = FT260_I2C_READ_REQ; + rep.length = cpu_to_le16(rd_len); + rep.address = addr; + rep.flag = flag; - ft260_dbg("rep %#02x addr %#02x len %d\n", rep.report, rep.address, - rep.length); + ft260_dbg("rep %#02x addr %#02x len %d rlen %d flag %#x\n", + rep.report, rep.address, len, rd_len, flag); - reinit_completion(&dev->wait); + reinit_completion(&dev->wait); - ret = ft260_hid_output_report(hdev, (u8 *)&rep, sizeof(rep)); - if (ret < 0) { - hid_err(hdev, "%s: failed to start transaction, ret %d\n", - __func__, ret); - return ret; - } + ret = ft260_hid_output_report(hdev, (u8 *)&rep, sizeof(rep)); + if (ret < 0) { + hid_err(hdev, "%s: failed with %d\n", __func__, ret); + return ret; + } - timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(5000); - if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&dev->wait, timeout)) { - ft260_i2c_reset(hdev); - return -ETIMEDOUT; - } + timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(5000); + if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&dev->wait, timeout)) { + ft260_i2c_reset(hdev); + return -ETIMEDOUT; + } - ret = ft260_xfer_status(dev); - if (ret == 0) - return 0; + ret = ft260_xfer_status(dev); + if (ret < 0) { + ft260_i2c_reset(hdev); + return -EIO; + } - ft260_i2c_reset(hdev); - return -EIO; + len -= rd_len; + data += rd_len; + flag = 0; + + } while (len > 0); + + return 0; } /* @@ -509,45 +522,37 @@ static int ft260_i2c_read(struct ft260_device *dev, u8 addr, u8 *data, */ static int ft260_i2c_write_read(struct ft260_device *dev, struct i2c_msg *msgs) { - int len, ret; - u16 left_len = msgs[1].len; - u8 *read_buf = msgs[1].buf; + int ret; + int wr_len = msgs[0].len; + int rd_len = msgs[1].len; + struct hid_device *hdev = dev->hdev; u8 addr = msgs[0].addr; u16 read_off = 0; - struct hid_device *hdev = dev->hdev; - if (msgs[0].len > 2) { - hid_err(hdev, "%s: unsupported wr len: %d\n", __func__, - msgs[0].len); + if (wr_len > 2) { + hid_err(hdev, "%s: invalid wr_len: %d\n", __func__, wr_len); return -EOPNOTSUPP; } - memcpy(&read_off, msgs[0].buf, msgs[0].len); - - do { - if (left_len <= FT260_RD_DATA_MAX) - len = left_len; + if (ft260_debug) { + if (wr_len == 2) + read_off = be16_to_cpu(*(u16 *)msgs[0].buf); else - len = FT260_RD_DATA_MAX; + read_off = *msgs[0].buf; - ft260_dbg("read_off %#x left_len %d len %d\n", read_off, - left_len, len); - - ret = ft260_i2c_write(dev, addr, (u8 *)&read_off, msgs[0].len, - FT260_FLAG_START); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; - - ret = ft260_i2c_read(dev, addr, read_buf, len, - FT260_FLAG_START_STOP); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; + pr_info("%s: off %#x rlen %d wlen %d\n", __func__, + read_off, rd_len, wr_len); + } - left_len -= len; - read_buf += len; - read_off += len; + ret = ft260_i2c_write(dev, addr, msgs[0].buf, wr_len, + FT260_FLAG_START); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; - } while (left_len > 0); + ret = ft260_i2c_read(dev, addr, msgs[1].buf, rd_len, + FT260_FLAG_START_STOP_REPEATED); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; return 0; }