From patchwork Tue Aug 25 07:20:37 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jean Delvare X-Patchwork-Id: 254894 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD2CC433E1 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 07:20:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F6B20578 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 07:20:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729245AbgHYHUj (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 03:20:39 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51812 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729209AbgHYHUj (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 03:20:39 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3DCB1AE; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 07:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:20:37 +0200 From: Jean Delvare To: Linux I2C Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: [PATCH v2] eeprom: at24: Tidy at24_read() Message-ID: <20200825092037.7ded996d@endymion> Organization: SUSE Linux X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org The elegant code in at24_read() has the drawback that we now need to make a copy of all parameters to pass them to the post-processing callback function if there is one. Rewrite the loop in such a way that the parameters are not modified, so saving them is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- This has the drawback of creating an asymetry with at24_write(), so I'm not 100% if we want to apply this. If anyone has a better idea, please let me know. Changes since v1: * Turn the "while" loop into a "for" loop to make the code neater. Suggested by Bartosz. drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 14 ++++---------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) --- linux-5.7.orig/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c 2020-08-24 19:25:52.967519228 +0200 +++ linux-5.7/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c 2020-08-25 08:25:23.033990857 +0200 @@ -422,10 +422,7 @@ static int at24_read(void *priv, unsigne struct at24_data *at24; struct device *dev; char *buf = val; - int ret; - unsigned int orig_off = off; - char *orig_buf = buf; - size_t orig_count = count; + int i, ret; at24 = priv; dev = at24_base_client_dev(at24); @@ -448,16 +445,13 @@ static int at24_read(void *priv, unsigne */ mutex_lock(&at24->lock); - while (count) { - ret = at24_regmap_read(at24, buf, off, count); + for (i = 0; count; i += ret, count -= ret) { + ret = at24_regmap_read(at24, buf + i, off + i, count); if (ret < 0) { mutex_unlock(&at24->lock); pm_runtime_put(dev); return ret; } - buf += ret; - off += ret; - count -= ret; } mutex_unlock(&at24->lock); @@ -465,7 +459,7 @@ static int at24_read(void *priv, unsigne pm_runtime_put(dev); if (unlikely(at24->read_post)) - at24->read_post(orig_off, orig_buf, orig_count); + at24->read_post(off, buf, i); return 0; }