Message ID | 20220130191225.303115-1-terry.bowman@amd.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Watchdog: sp5100_tco: Replace cd6h/cd7h port I/O accesses with MMIO accesses | expand |
Hi Terry, On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 13:12:21 -0600, Terry Bowman wrote: > Please confirm to leave your reviewed-by and tested-by. Confirmed. I reviewed the 4 patches of this version of the series and I'm fine with them. I also tested the result successfully on my laptop. Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> Tested-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> Thanks for your work.
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 14:03:08 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Confirmed. I reviewed the 4 patches of this version of the series and > > I'm fine with them. I also tested the result successfully on my laptop. > > > > Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> > > Tested-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> > > Does that mean you are happy with the i2c-piix4 changes as well? I'm still reviewing these, sorry. I only picked the first patch of the series so that the sp5100_tco patches would build so I could test them. I hope to be done by the end of the day.
> I'm still reviewing these, sorry. I only picked the first patch of the > series so that the sp5100_tco patches would build so I could test them. Ah, I see. I thought more than the first patch was needed for testing. > I hope to be done by the end of the day. Awesome, thank you!
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 11:00:31 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > I'm still reviewing these, sorry. I only picked the first patch of the > > series so that the sp5100_tco patches would build so I could test them. > > Ah, I see. I thought more than the first patch was needed for testing. You need the full series to be on the safe side, otherwise there's a risk that the two drivers will access the same registers using different methods (legacy I/O vs MMIO) so there's no synchronization and they could step on each other's toes. However as I knew about this limitation, I was careful to not use the SMBus driver while I was testing the watchdog driver :-)