Message ID | 20200929221915.10979-1-digetx@gmail.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Improvements for Tegra I2C driver | expand |
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:18:43AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > Hello! > > This series performs refactoring of the Tegra I2C driver code and hardens > the atomic-transfer mode. Applied to for-next, thanks to everyone! Please send incremental patches from now on. Also, there is this unreviewed series: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=191802 Is it obsolete by now?
05.10.2020 23:52, Wolfram Sang пишет: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:18:43AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> Hello! >> >> This series performs refactoring of the Tegra I2C driver code and hardens >> the atomic-transfer mode. > > Applied to for-next, thanks to everyone! Please send incremental patches > from now on. Hello, Wolfram! Thank you! This series started with 10 small patches and then was growing with every new review round because more ideas were suggested and I needed to rebase/redo majority of the patches, hence it was a bit difficult to split it up into a smaller parts that could be applied incrementally. But I'll try to improve this in the future, thanks! > Also, there is this unreviewed series: > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=191802 > > Is it obsolete by now? > To be honest, I don't know. The author never answered, guess he may reappear sometime in the future with a v2. Those patches need to be corrected and rebased.
Hi Dmitry, > Hello, Wolfram! Thank you! This series started with 10 small patches and > then was growing with every new review round because more ideas were > suggested and I needed to rebase/redo majority of the patches, hence it > was a bit difficult to split it up into a smaller parts that could be > applied incrementally. But I'll try to improve this in the future, thanks! Ah, you got me wrong. What I meant was: If these patches still need changes or updates, don't send a new version of all the patches, but rather send incremental fixes on top of these patches. Sometimes it happens that you end up with 30+ patches, no worries. > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=191802 > > > > Is it obsolete by now? > > > > To be honest, I don't know. The author never answered, guess he may > reappear sometime in the future with a v2. Those patches need to be > corrected and rebased. Then, I will mark them as "Changes requested". Thanks for the heads up! Regards, Wolfram